Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landowner interest in multifunctional agroforestry Riparian buffers

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adoption of temperate agroforestry practices generally remains limited despite considerable advances in basic science. This study builds on temperate agroforestry adoption research by empirically testing a statistical model of interest in native fruit and nut tree riparian buffers using technology and agroforestry adoption theory. Data were collected in three watersheds in Virginia’s ridge and valley region and used to test hypothesized predictors of interest in planting these buffers. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify independence of underlying latent measures. Multiple linear regression was used to model interest using the Universal Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). A second model that added agroforestry-specific predictors from Pattanayak et al. (Agrofor Syst 57:173–186, 2003) to UTAUT was tested and compared with the first. The first model was robust (Adj R 2 = 0.49) but was improved by adding agroforestry specific predictors (Adj R 2 = 0.57). Model generalizability was confirmed using double cross validation and normality indices. Social influence, risk expectancy, planting experience, performance expectancy, parcel size, and the interaction of gender and risk were significant in the final model. In addition, socioeconomic variables were used to characterize landowners according to their level of interest. Respondents with greater interest were newer owners that have higher incomes and are less active in farming. The result implies that future agroforesters may in large part consist of owners that have recently acquired land and manage their property more extensively with higher discretionary income and multiple objectives in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle JG, Valdivia C, Raedeke A, Green J, Rikoon JS (2009) Non-operator landowner interest in agroforestry practices in two Missouri watersheds. Agrofor Syst 75:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwell RC, Schulte LA, Westphal LM (2009) Linking resilience theory and diffusion of innovations theory to understand the potential for perennials in the US Corn Belt. Ecol Soc 14(1):30–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri C, Valdivia C (2010) Recreational multifunctionality and its implications for agroforestry diffusion. Agrofor Syst 79:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Leatherby EC (2004) Americas family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian F (1979) The innovator’s situation: upper-middle class conservatism in agricultural communities. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q 19(2):189–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper ER, Jacobson MG (2009) Establishing conservation easements on forested riparian buffers: opportunities for long-term streamside protection. Small-scale For 8:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 22(14):1111–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson DL, Ryan RL, De Young R (2002) Woodlots in the rural landscape: landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study. Lands Urban Plan 58:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone AM, Goodwin BK (1993) Factors influencing a farmer’s decision to invest in long-term conservation improvements. Land Econ 69(1):67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Boston Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S, Scherr S (eds) (2002) Trees on the farm: assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in Africa. CABI, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJA (2002) Survey nonresponse. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Xiang P, Keating XD (2004) Evaluating the replicability of sample results: a tutorial of double cross-validation methods. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 8:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan PT (1996) Evaluating determinants of participation in voluntary riparian buffer programs: a case study of Maryland’s buffer incentive program. Master’s thesis, University of Maryland

  • Jones SB, Luloff AE, Finley JC (1995) Another look at NIPFs: facing our myths. J For 93(9):41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra A, Hull RB (2005) Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. Soc Am For 51(2):142–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Konyar K, Osborn CT (1990) A national-level economic analysis of conservation reserve program participation: a discrete choice approach. J Agric Econ Res 42(2):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews S, Pease SM, Gordon AM, Williams PA (1993) Landowner perceptions and the adoption of agroforestry practices in southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 21:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty MM, Swisher ME, Alavalapati J (2008) Agroforestry adoption and maintenance: self-efficacy, attitudes, and socio-economic factors. Agrofor Syst 73:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer DE (2004) Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: a review. Agrofor Syst 204411:311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer DE, Miller RP (1998) Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: progress, prospects, and priorities. Agrofor Syst 38:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montambault JR, Alavalapati JRR (2005) Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: a decade in review. Agrofor Syst 65:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak SK, Mercer DE, Sills E, Yang J (2003) Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. Agrofor Syst 57:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raedeke AH, Green JJ, Hodge SS, Valdivia C (2003) Farmers, the practice of farming and the future of agroforestry: an application of Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus. Rural Sociol 68(1):64–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RL, Erickson DL, De Young R (2003) Farmers’ motivations for adoption conservation practices along riparian zones in a mid-western agricultural watershed. J Environ Plan Manag 46(1):19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon S, Farnsworth RL, Bullock DG, Yusuf R (1997) Family factors affecting adoption of sustainable farming systems. J Soil Water Conserv 52(2):265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S (2000) A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy 25:79–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong NA, Jacobson MG (2005) Assessing agroforestry adoption potential utilizing market segmentation: a case study in Pennsylvania. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy 4(2):215–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q 19(2):561–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM (1991) Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q 15(1):124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traore N, Landry R, Amara N (1998) On-farm adoption of conservation practices: the role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Econ 74(1):114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trozzo KE, Munsell JF, Chamberlain JL (2014) Potential adoption of agroforestry riparian buffers based on landowner and streamside characteristics. J of Soil and Water Qual 69(2):140–150. doi:10.2489/jswc.69.2.140

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA FSA (2012) Conservation reserve enhancement program. Farm Service Agency, United State Department of Agriculture. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=copr&topic=cep

  • Valdivia C, Poulos C (2009) Factors affecting farm operators’ interest in incorporating riparian buffers and forest farming practices in northeast and southeast Missouri. Agrofor Syst 75(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman SW, Bannister ME, Nair PKE (2003) Agroforestry potential in the southeastern United States: perceptions of landowners and extension professionals. Agrofor Syst 59(1):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the United States Department of Agriculture National Agroforestry Center for their support. Additional thanks goes to Fred Garst of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Beth Stein, Elizabeth Moore, Lukas Burgher, Yujuan Chen, and finally, the survey participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie E. Trozzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trozzo, K.E., Munsell, J.F. & Chamberlain, J.L. Landowner interest in multifunctional agroforestry Riparian buffers. Agroforest Syst 88, 619–629 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9678-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9678-5

Keywords

Navigation