Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of density and neighbours on interactions between invasive plants of similar growth form

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive aquatic plants constitute a great problem in many freshwater systems. Although many studies have addressed the potential threats of invasion by exotic species in aquatic ecosystems, few studies have considered the interactions (competition, facilitation, coexistence) between exotic aquatic plants of similar growth form in invaded communities. Our aim was to investigate experimentally the effect of density in monocultures and the effect of neighbour identity and plant density on a focal species in mixed cultures. We used Elodea canadensis, Egeria densa and Lagarosiphon major as model species and conducted two experiments, one in a monoculture and another in a mixed culture following an additive design. Individuals were planted in pots with several treatments based on the identity and density of neighbour species. Our results demonstrated that the development of an invasive submerged plant could be influenced either positively (facilitation) or negatively (competition or inhibition) by the presence of more than one neighbour species of different densities. An increase in density significantly stimulated competition intensity, although the effect of density on the performance of the invader also depended on neighbour identity. A facilitative effect of E. canadensis on the apical growth of E. densa was established. However, despite these results, the competitive outcome also depended on other environmental factors (e.g. underwater radiation), not on plant density and neighbour identity alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguiar MR, Lauenroth WK, Peters DP (2001) Intensity of intra- and interspecific competition in coexisting shortgrass species. J Ecol 89:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain MH, Elger A (2004) Experiments on growth interactions between two invasive macrophytes species. J Veg Sci 15:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton J, Edwards T (2006) Aquatic plants as environmental indicators of ecological condition in New Zealand lakes. Hydrobiologia 570:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CDK, Urmi-König K (1984) A revision of the genus Egeria (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat Bot 19:73–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CDK, Urmi-könig K (1985) A revision of the genus Elodea (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat Bot 21:111–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC, Norton TA, Kain JM (1997) Intraspecific competition in Fucus serratus germlings: the interaction of light, nutrient and density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 212:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale TM, Clements D, Hunt TD, Butler KL (2012) Survival of a submerged aquatic weed (Egeria densa) during lake drawdown within mounds of stranded vegetation. Lake Reser Manag 28:153–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gérard J, Natacha B, Ludwig T (2014) Effect of water column phosphorus reduction on competitive outcome and traits of Ludwigia grandiflora and L. peploides, invasive species in Europe. Aquat Invas 9:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstra DE, Clayton J, Green JD, Auger M (1999) Competitive performance of Hydrilla verticillata in New Zealand. Aquat Bot 63:305–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Williams C, Clayton JS, Coffey BT, Johnstone IM (1987) Macrophyte invasions. In: Viner AB (ed) Inland waters of New Zealand DSIR bulletin, vol 241. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Science Information Publishing Centre, Wellington, pp 307–331

    Google Scholar 

  • James CS, Eaton JW, Hardwick K (1999) Competition between three submerged macrophytes, Elodea canadensis Michx, Elodea nuttallii (Planch) St John and Lagarosiphon major (Ridl) Moss. Hydrobiologia 415:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James CS, Eaton JW, Hardwick K (2006) Responses of three invasive aquatic macrophytes to nutrient enrichment do not explain their observed field displacements. Aquat Bot 84:347–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolada A, Kutyta S (2016) Elodea canadensis (Michx.) in Polish lakes: a non-aggressive addition to native flora. Biol Invasion 18:3251–3264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Les DH, Moody ML, Soros CL (2006) A reappraisal of phylogenetic relationships in the monocotyledon family Hydrocharitaceae (Alismatidae). Aliso 22:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham JH, Chanway CP (1996) Measuring plant neighbour effects. Funct Ecol 10:548–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GD, Coetzee JA (2014) Competition between two aquatic macrophytes, Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss (Hydrocharitaceae) and Myriophyllum spicatum Linnaeus (Haloragaceae) as influenced by substrate sediment and nutrients. Aquat Bot 114:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreary JN (1991) Competition as a mechanism of submersed macrophyte community structure. Aquat Bot 4:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckee D, Hatton K, Eaton JW, Moss B (2002) Effects of simulated climate warming on macrophytes in freshwater microcosm communities. Aquat Bot 74:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen RA, Cohen Y (1989) Growth and competition between Potamogeton pectinatus L. and Myriophyllum exalbescens Fern. in experimental ecosystems. Aquat Bot 33:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mony C, Koschnick TJ, Haller WT, Muller S (2007) Competition between two invasive Hydrocharitaceae (Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle and Egeria densa Planch) as influenced by sediment fertility and season. Aquat Bot 86:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ, Olden JD (2008) Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:521–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Redekop P, Hofstra D, Husser A (2016) Elodea canadensis shows a higher dispersal capacity via fragmentation than Egeria densa and Lagarasiphon major. Aquat Bot 130:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren MX, Zhang QG (2009) The relative generality of plant invasion mechanisms and predicting future invasive plants. Weed Res 49:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo C, Tison-Rosebery J, Buquet D, Jan G, Jamoneau A, Abril G, Anschutz P, Bertrin V (2018) Invasive aquatic plants as ecosystem engineers in an Oligo-Mesotrophic shallow lake. Front Plant Sci 9:1781

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Riis T, Olesen B, Clayton JS, Lambertini C, Brix H, Sorrell B (2012) Growth and morphology in relation to temperature and light availability during the establishment of three invasive aquatic plant species. Aquat Bot 102:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos MJ, Anderson LW, Ustin SL (2011) Effects of invasive species on plant communities: an example using submersed aquatic plants at the regional scale. Biol Invasion 13:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira MJ, Thiébaut G (2017) Impact of climate warming on plant growth varied according to the season. Limnologica 65:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira MJ, Chollet S, Thiébaut G, Thomaz SM (2018) Abiotic factors, not herbivorous pressure, are primarily responsible for the performance of an invasive aquatic plant. Ann Limnol Int J Lim 54:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WTZ, Thomaz SM, Murphy KJ (2010) Response of native Egeria najas Planch. and invasive Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle to altered hydroecological regime in a subtropical river. Aquat Bot 92:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Rejmanek M (1989) Propagule type influences competition between two submersed aquatic macrophytes. Oecologia 81:132–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Rejmanek M (2010) Competition between two submersed aquatic macrophytes, Potamogeton pectinatus and Potamogeton gramineus, across a light gradient. Aquat Bot 92:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiers I, Njambuya J, Triest L (2011) Competitive abilities of invasive Lagarasiphon major and native Ceratophyllum dermersum in monocultures and mixed cultures in relation to experimental sediment dredging. Aquat Bot 95:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz SM, Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Silveira MJ, Rejmánek M, Aslan CE, Chow E (2012) Using space-for-time substitution and time sequence approaches in invasion ecology. Fresh Biol 13:2401–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Nemergut DR, Pu Z, Jiang L (2011) Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. Ecol Lett 14:782–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JW, Yu D, Xiong W, Han YQ (2008) Above-and belowground competition between two submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 607:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. J Ecol 91:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weraduwage SM, Chen J, Anozie FC, Morales A, Weise SE, Sharkey TD (2015) The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 6:167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MV (2007) Measuring the components of competition along productivity gradients. J Ecol 95:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YH, An SQ, Wu BF, Wang WW (2006) Density-dependent root morphology and root distribution in the submerged plant Vallisneria natans. Environ Exp Bot 57:195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Shen N, Yu S, Yu D, Liu C (2018) Responses of the native species Sparganium angustifolium and the invasive species Egeria densa to warming and interspecific competition. PLoS ONE 13:e0199478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dra. Vanessa C. Harthman (Universidade Estadual de Maringá) for fruitful discussion, Msc. Dieson André for helping with quality of the figures and the two anonymous reviewers for suggestions that have improved our manuscript a lot. We also thank Bertrand Coupé and Marc Hervé for their help in the field and Nathalie Josselin-Le Bris for assistance with water analyses. M.J. Silveira is grateful to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), for providing a Post-Doctorate scholarship and Rennes Metropole.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Márcio José Silveira.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling Editor: Télesphore Sime-Ngando.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silveira, M.J., Thiébaut, G. Effect of density and neighbours on interactions between invasive plants of similar growth form. Aquat Ecol 54, 463–474 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09753-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09753-1

Keywords

Navigation