Abstract
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is a mature technique for biogas upgrading. However, it constitutes the most expensive step to obtain fuel-quality bio-methane, particularly in small-scale units. To reduce the cost of upgrading in small-scale plants, we have evaluated different PSA cycles with two and three columns (less than commercial units). An equalization tank was used to perform one asynchronous pressure equalization step and keep the process fed continuous even in the case of using two columns. The effect of the purge step was also evaluated. Carbon molecular sieve was used as adsorbent. The feed composition was 40% CO2/60% CH4 and pressure swinging between 5 and 0.1 bar in the adsorption and blowdown steps, respectively. Four performance indicators (methane purity and recovery, productivity and energy consumption) were used to evaluate the PSA cycles. The mathematical model could predict the experimental PSA performance. Bio-methane with purity higher than 97.5% (specification) and recovery higher than 90% was obtained experimentally using a PSA with two columns and an equalization tank. When a third column is used (implementing an additional pressure equalization), the recovery increases in approx. 4% showing the importance of pressure equalization to reduce the methane slip.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augelletti, R., Conti, M., Annesini, M.C.: Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. A new process configuration for the separation of biomethane and carbon dioxide. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 1390–1398 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.013
Bhadra, S.J., Farooq, S.: Separation of methane-nitrogen mixture by pressure swing adsorption for natural gas upgrading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 14030–14045 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie201237x
Bhatt, T.S., Storti, G., Denayer, J.F.M., Rota, R.: Optimal design of dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption units via equilibrium theory: process configurations employing heavy gas for pressure swing. Chem. Eng. J. 311, 385–406 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.111
Canevesi, R.L.S., Andreassen, K.A., Da Silva, E.A., Borba, C.E., Grande, C.A.: Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading with carbon molecular sieve. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 8057–8067 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00996
Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Removal of carbon dioxide from natural gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Energy Fuels 20, 2648–2659 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060119e
Chahbani, M.H., Talmoudi, R., Abdel Jaoued, A., Tondeur, D.: Modeling and simulation of pressure equalization step between a packed bed and an empty tank in pressure swing adsorption cycles. Open Chem. Eng. J. 11, 33–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874123101711010033
Da Silva, F.A., Silva, J.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: General package for the simulation of cyclic adsorption processes. Adsorption 5, 229–244 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008974908427
Delgado, J.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Analysis of the boundary conditions for the simulation of the pressure equalization step in PSA cycles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63, 4452–4463 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.06.016
Effendy, S., Xu, C., Farooq, S.: Optimization of a pressure swing adsorption process for nitrogen rejection from natural gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 5417–5431 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00513
Florides, G.A., Christodoulides, P.: Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Environ. Int. 35, 390–401 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.007
Grande, C.A., Blom, R.: Utilization of dual-PSA technology for natural gas upgrading and integrated CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 26, 2–14 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.004
Grande, C.A., Roussanaly, S., Anantharaman, R., Lindqvist, K., Singh, P., Kemper, J.: CO2 capture in natural gas production by adsorption processes. Energy Procedia 114, 2259–2264 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1363
Guérin de Montgareuil, P., Domine, D.: Process for separating a binary gaseous mixture by adsorption. US Patent 3,155,468, 3 Nov 1964
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang. Work. Gr. I Contrib. to IPCC Fifth Assess. Rep. (AR5)(Cambridge Univ Press. New York). 1535 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000115
Jiang, Y., Ling, J., Xiao, P., He, Y., Zhao, Q., Chu, Z., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Webley, P.A.: Simultaneous biogas purification and CO2 capture by vacuum swing adsorption using zeolite NaUSY. Chem. Eng. J. 334, 2593–2602 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.090
Khurana, M., Farooq, S.: Simulation and optimization of a 6-step dual-reflux VSA cycle for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. Sci. 152, 507–515 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.06.033
Krishnamurthy, R., Lerner, S.L., MacLean, D.L.: PSA Multicomponent separation utilizing tank equalization. US Patent 4,816,039, 28 Mar 1989
Labus, K., Machnikowski, J.: Separation of carbon dioxide from coal gasification-derived gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 2022–2029 (2014)
Lashof, D., Ahuja, D.R.: Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344, 529–531 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/344529a0
Ling, J., Ntiamoah, A., Xiao, P., Webley, P.A., Zhai, Y.: Effects of feed gas concentration, temperature and process parameters on vacuum swing adsorption performance for CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 265, 47–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.121
Marx, D., Joss, L., Hefti, M., Gazzani, M., Mazzotti, M.: CO2 capture from a binary CO2/N2 and a ternary CO2/N2/H2 mixture by PSA: experiments and predictions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54, 6035–6045 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00943
Paolini, V., Petracchini, F., Segreto, M., Tomassetti, L., Naja, N., Cecinato, A.: Environmental impact of biogas: a short review of current knowledge. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A. 53, 899–906 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076
Pellegrini, L.A., De Guido, G., Langé, S.: Biogas to liquefied biomethane via cryogenic upgrading technologies. Renew. Energy 124, 75–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.007
Poeschl, M., Ward, S., Owende, P.: Environmental impacts of biogas deployment–Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. J. Clean. Prod. 24, 168–183 (2012a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.039
Poeschl, M., Ward, S., Owende, P.: Environmental impacts of biogas deployment–Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 24, 184–201 (2012b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030
Pöschl, M., Ward, S., Owende, P.: Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl. Energy 87, 3305–3321 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011
Ribeiro, A.M., Grande, C.A., Lopes, F.V.S., Loureiro, J.M., Rodrigues, A.E.: A parametric study of layered bed PSA for hydrogen purification. Chem. Eng. Sc. 63, 5258–5273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.07.017
Rocha, L.A.M., Andreassen, K.A., Grande, C.A.: Separation of CO2/CH4 using carbon molecular sieve (CMS) at low and high pressure. Chem. Eng. Sci. 164, 148–157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.071
Rutherford, S.W., Nguyen, C., Coons, J.E., Do, D.D.: Characterization of carbon molecular sieves using methane and carbon dioxide as adsorptive probes. Langmuir 19, 8335–8342 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/la034472d
Santos, M.P.S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. Effect of recycling streams in pressure swing adsorption design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 974–985 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100757u
Schell, J., Casas, N., Marx, D., Mazzotti, M.: Precombustion CO2 capture by pressure swing adsorption (PSA): comparison of laboratory PSA experiments and simulations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 8311–8322 (2013)
Siqueira, R.M., Freitas, G.R., Peixoto, H.R., Do Nascimento, J.F., Musse, A.P.S., Torres, A.E.B., Azevedo, D.C.S., Bastos-Neto, M.: Carbon dioxide capture by pressure swing adsorption. Energy Procedia 114, 2182–2192 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1355
Skarstrom, C.: Method and apparatus for fractionating gaseous mixtures by adsorption. US Patent 2,944,627, 12 Jul 1960
Stark, T.M.: Gas separation by adsorption process. US Patent 3,252,268, 24 May 1966
Webley, P.A., Qader, A., Ntiamoah, A., Ling, J., Xiao, P., Zhai, Y.: A new multi-bed vacuum swing adsorption cycle for CO2 capture from flue gas streams. Energy Procedia 114, 2467–2480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1398
Wu, B., Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Bao, D., Zhang, S.: Assessment of the energy consumption of the biogas upgrading process with pressure swing adsorption using novel adsorbents. J. Clean. Prod. 101, 251–261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.082
Xuan, J., Leung, M.K.H., Leung, D.Y.C., Ni, M.: A review of biomass-derived fuel processors for fuel cell systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 1301–1313 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.027
Yavary, M., Ebrahim, H.A., Falamaki, C.: The effect of number of pressure equalization steps on the performance of pressure swing adsorption process. Chem. Eng. Process. 87, 35–44 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2014.11.003
Zhang, J., Webley, P.A., Xiao, P.: Effect of process parameters on power requirements of vacuum swing adsorption technology for CO2 capture from flue gas. Energy Convers. Manag. 49, 346–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.06.007
Zhang, Y., Sunarso, J., Liu, S., Wang, R.: Current status and development of membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: a review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 12, 84–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.009
Acknowledgements
This work was partly funded by the Innovation Fund Denmark (IFD) under File No. 5157-00008B, HiGradeGas (http://www.higradegas.eu). R. L. S. C. thank to CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canevesi, R.L.S., Andreassen, K.A., Silva, E.A. et al. Evaluation of simplified pressure swing adsorption cycles for bio-methane production. Adsorption 25, 783–793 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-019-00049-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-019-00049-x