Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical properties and structure of Haliotis discus hannai Ino and Hemifusus tuba conch shells: a comparative study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Haliotis discus hannai Ino (abalone shell) and Hemifusus tuba conch shell have been studied for the purpose to comparatively investigate the mechanisms by which nature designs composites. It is shown that both shells are composed of aragonite and a small amount of proteins while the conch shell shows finer microstructure but lower strength than abalone shell. It is also shown that the fresh shells exhibits better property than those after heat-treatments. It is therefore supposed that the size of inorganic substance is not a dominant factor to improve strength, while both proteins in shells and the microstructure of inorganic matter also play important roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicolis G., Prigogine I.: Self-organization and Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics: from Dissipative Structures in Order Through Fluctuations. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ball P.: Life’s lessons in design. Nature 409(6818), 413–416 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vincent J.F.V.: Structural Biomaterials. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhn-Spearing L.T., Kessler H., Chateau E., Ballarin R., Heuer A.H., Spearing S.M.: Fracture mechanisms of the Strombus gigas conch shell: implications for the design of brittle laminates. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 6583–6594 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner S., Wagner H.D.: The material bone: structure mechanical function relations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 271–298 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiner S., Addadi L.: Design strategies in mineralized biological materials. J. Mater. Chem. 7, 689–702 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baer E., Hiltner A., Morgan R.J.: Biological and synthetic hierarchical composites. Phys. Today 45(10), 60–67 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lowenstam H.A., Weiner S.: On Biomineralisation. Oxford University Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Menig R., Meyers M.H., Meyers M.A., Vecchio K.S.: Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of strombus gigas (conch) shells. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 297, 203–211 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Song F., Zhou J.B., Xu X.H., Xu Y., Bai Y.L.: Effect of a negative poisson ratio in the tension of ceramics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 245502 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin Albert Y.M., Chen P.Y., Meyers M.A.: Biological materials: structure and mechanical. Prog. Mater Sci. 53, 1–206 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Chen, C., Liang, Y. et al. Mechanical properties and structure of Haliotis discus hannai Ino and Hemifusus tuba conch shells: a comparative study. Acta Mech Sin 26, 21–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-009-0308-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-009-0308-9

Keywords

Navigation