Abstract
This work presents the fabrication and characterisation of a versatile lab-on-a-chip system that combines magnetic capture and electrochemical detection. The system comprises a silicon chip featuring a series of microband electrodes, a PDMS gasket that incorporates the microfluidic channels, and a polycarbonate base where permanent magnets are hosted; these parts are designed to fit so that wire bonding and encapsulation are avoided. This system can perform bioassays over the surface of magnetic beads and uses only 50 μL of bead suspension per assay. Following detection, captured beads are released simply by sliding a thin iron plate between the magnets and the chip. Particles are captured upstream from the detector and we demonstrate how to take further advantage of the system fluidics to determine enzyme activities or concentrations, as flow velocity can be adjusted to the rate of the reactions under study. We used magnetic particles containing β-galactosidase and monitored the enzyme activity amperometrically by the oxidation of 4-aminophenol, enzymatically produced from 4-aminophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside. The system is able to detect the presence of enzyme down to approximately 50 ng mL−1.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alden JA, Feldman MA, Hill E, Prieto F, Oyama M, Coles BA, Compton RG, Dobson PJ, Leigh PA (1998) Channel microband electrode arrays for mechanistic electrochemistry. Two-dimensional voltammetry: transport-limited currents. Anal Chem 70:1707–1720
Amatore C, Da Mota N, Sella C, Thouin L (2008) General concept of high-performance amperometric detector for microfluidic (bio)analytical chips. Anal Chem 80:4976–4985
Baldrich E, Muñoz FX (2008) Enzyme shadowing: using antibody-enzyme dually labeled magnetic particles for fast bacterial detection. Analyst 133:1009–1012
Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (2001) Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, Chichester
Choi JW, Oh KW, Thomas JH, Heineman WR, Halsall HB, Nevin JH, Helmicki AJ, Henderson HT, Ahn CH (2002) An integrated microfluidic biochemical detection system for protein analysis with magnetic bead-based sampling capabilities. Lab Chip 2:27–30
Compton RG, Banks CE (2007) Understanding voltammetry. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
Compton RG, Fisher AC, Wellington RG, Dobson PJ, Leigh PA (1993) Hydrodynamic voltammetry with microelectrodes. Channel microband electrodes: theory and experiment. J Phys Chem 97:10410–10415
Conant JB, Pratt MF (1926) The irreversible oxidation of organic compounds I. The oxidation of aminophenols by reagents of definite potential. JACS 48:3178–3192
Cooper JA, Compton RG (1998) Channel electrodes—a review. Electroanalysis 10:141–155
Do J, Ahn CH (2008) A polymer lab-on-a-chip for magnetic immunoassay with on-chip sampling and detection capabilities. Lab Chip 8:542–549
Duffy DC, Mcdonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984
Farrell S, Ronkainen-Matsuno NJ, Halsall HB, Heineman WR (2004) Bead-based immunoassays with microelectrode detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 379:358–367
Francis PS, Lewis SW, Lim KF, Carlsson K, Karlberg B (2002) Flow analysis based on a pulsed flow of the solution: theory, instrumentation and applications. Talanta 58:1029–1042
Gabig-Ciminska M, Holmgren A, Andresen H, Bundvig Barken K, Wümpelmann M, Albers J, Hintsche R, Breitenstein A, Neubauer P, Los M, Czyz A, Wegrzyn G, Silfversparre G, Jürgen B, Schweder T, Enfors SO (2004) Electric chips for rapid detection and quantification of nucleic acids. Biosens Bioelectron 19:537–546
Gijs MAM (2004) Magnetic bead handling on-chip: new opportunities for analytical applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:22–40
Goncalves D, Faria RC, Yonashiro M, Bulhoes LOS (2000) Electrochemical oxidation of o-aminophenol in aqueous acidic medium: formation of film and soluble products. J Electroanal Chem 487:90–99
Goral VN, Zaytseva NV, Baeumner AJ (2006) Electrochemical microfluidic biosensor for the detection of nucleic acid sequences. Lab Chip 6:414–421
Llopis X, Pumera M, Alegret S, Merkoçi A (2009) Lab-on-a-chip for ultrasensitive detection of carbofuran by enzymatic inhibition with replacement of enzyme using magnetic beads. Lab Chip 9:213–218
Lund-Olesen T, Bruus H, Hansen MF (2007) Quantitative characterization of magnetic separators: comparison of systems with and without integrated microfluidic mixers. Biomed Microdev 9:195–205
Másson M, Liu Z, Haruyama T, Kobatake E, Ikariyama Y, Aizawa M (1995) Immunosensing with amperometric detection, using galactosidase as label and p-aminophenyl-B-d-galactopyranoside as substrate. Anal Chim Acta 304:353–359
Mcdonald JC, Whitesides GM (2002) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc Chem Res 35:491–499
Mikkelsen C, Fougt Hansen M, Bruus H (2005) Theoretical comparison of magnetic and hydrodynamic interactions between magnetically tagged particles in microfluidic systems. J Magn Magn Mater 293:578–583
Morland PD, Compton RG (1999) Heterogeneous and homogeneous EC and ECE processes at channel electrodes: analytical wave shape theory. J Phys Chem B 103:8951–8959
Nicholson RS, Shain I (1964) Theory of stationary electrode polarography single scan and cyclic methods applied to reversible, irreversible, and kinetic systems. Anal Chem 36:706–723
Niwa O, Xu Y, Brian Halsall H, Heineman WR (1993) Small-volume voltammetric detection of 4-aminophenol with interdigitated array electrodes and its application to electrochemical enzyme immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 65:1559–1563
Plichon V, Faure G (1973) Thin-layer electrochemistry—applications to chemical-kinetics—example of para-aminophenol. J Electroanal Chem 44:275–290
Rees NV, Compton RG (2008) Hydrodynamic microelectrode voltammetry. Russ J Electrochem 44:368–389
Rossier JS, Girault HH (2001) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on a microchip with electrochemical detection. Lab Chip 1:153–157
Shinohara H, Mizuno J, Shoji S (2007) Low-temperature direct bonding of poly(methyl methacrylate) for polymer microchips. IEE J Trans Elect Electron Eng 2:301–306
Smistrup K, Bu M, Wolff A, Bruus H, Hansen MF (2008) Theoretical analysis of a new, efficient microfluidic magnetic bead separator based on magnetic structures on multiple length scales. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 4:565–573
Snakenborg D, Perozziello G, Klank H, Geschke O, Kutter JP (2006) Direct milling and casting of polymer-based optical waveguides for improved transparency in the visible range. J Micromech Microeng 16:375–381
Thomas JH, Kim SK, Hesketh PJ, Halsall HB, Heineman WR (2004) Microbead-based electrochemical immunoassay with interdigitated array electrodes. Anal Biochem 328:113–122
Tokuda K, Matsuda H (1974) Theory of stationary current–voltage curves of redox-electrode reactions in hydrodynamic voltammetry. IX. Double electrodes in channel flow. J Electroanal Chem 52:421–431
Tsao CW, Hromada L, Liu J, Kumar P, Devoe DL (2007) Low temperature bonding of PMMA and COC microfluidic substrates using UV/ozone surface treatment. Lab Chip 7:499–505
Verpoorte E (2003) Beads and chips: new recipes for analysis. Lab Chip 3:60N
Voet D, Voet JG (1995) Biochemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Wilke CR, Chang P (1955) A I Ch E J 1:264
Yamaguchi S, Mitsugi S (1997) Sensitive amperometry of 4-aminophenol (4AP) based on the catalytic current produced by the 4AP-diphorase-NADH system at a glassy carbon electrode and its application to enzyme assay. Effect of the inhibition of diaphorase by NADH. Anal Sci 13:307–309
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the Spanish ministry of Science and Innovation through the Microbactometer Project. NG was supported by CSIC’s JAE Program and JdC was supported by a Ramón y Cajal Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godino, N., Snakenborg, D., Kutter, J.P. et al. Construction and characterisation of a modular microfluidic system: coupling magnetic capture and electrochemical detection. Microfluid Nanofluid 8, 393–402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0468-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0468-8