Skip to main content
Log in

Trace and evaluation systems for health services quality in rural and remote areas: a systematic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 30 January 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Aim

To provide a systematic review of the existing theory, framework, systems and instruments for tracing and evaluating quality in rural health services.

Subjects and methods

We searched six electronic databases up to March 2016. Observational studies of quality assessment of rural health services using theoretical models were included. Ekman’s scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.

Results

A total of 18 studies, published between 2001 and 2015, met the inclusion criteria. The corresponding authors for most of them (7, 44%) are from Chinese institutions and three (3, 17%) from Australian institutions. Five studies (28%) focused on township hospitals. Primary health care quality was reported in five studies (28%), followed by clinical service in four (22%). More than half of the studies (61%) were considered of high quality, and the remainder was of moderate quality. These studies applied 16 theoretical systems, including the model/pattern (4, 25%), method/tool (7, 44%) and framework of the theory (5, 31%). Most of the theoretical models (14, 88%) obtained positive observations. In addition, the conceptual model (6, 36%) and TOPSIS method (2, 13%) were more frequently reported.

Conclusion

Although most of the current studies were considered to have high-quality and positive results, there were limitations in the number of publications and research on theoretical systems. The lacks of unified standards and comprehensive evaluation are important issues that need to be pointed out and resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 30 January 2018

    The journal had been advised to revise the title so that Clarivate Analytics can try to count the citations more accurately. There’s been confusion due to the existence of another journal with the same name.

References

  • Aldana JM, Piechulek H, Al-Sabir A (2001) Client satisfaction and quality of health care in rural Bangladesh. Bull World Health Organ 79:512–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos A, Páez R, Carmona E, Rivas H (2013) A systems approach to modeling community-based environmental monitoring: a case of participatory water quality monitoring in rural Mexico. Environ Moniton Assess 185:10297–10316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3333-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y (2011) Study on the improvement of health service quality of township hospital in Huining County River. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Tang C, Zheng J (2011) Evaluation of primary health care service quality and its influencing factors. Chine Rural Health Serv Adm 31:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham S, Basnet I, Pathak LR, Mccall M (2004) The evolution of a quality of care approach for improving emergency obstetric care in rural hospitals in Nepal. Int J Gynecol Obstet 86:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.03.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambruoso L, Achadi E, Adisasmita A, Izati Y, Makowiecka K, Hussein J (2009) Assessing quality of care provided by Indonesian village midwives with a confidential enquiry. Midwifery 25:528–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman B (2004) Community-based health insurance in low-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy Plann 19:249–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czh031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Zhang H, Yang L, Jia J, Duan L, Rong N (2011) Analysis on the status quo of public health service in rural areas of China. Chin J Health Policy 4:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys JS, Solarsh G (2008) At risk populations: rural. In: Heggenhougen HK (ed) The International Encyclopaedia of Public Health. Elsevier, London, pp 242–253

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B, Dicks D, Macdonald L, Burge F (2012) Using quality indicators to evaluate the effect of implementing an enhanced collaborative care model among a community, primary healthcare practice population. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) 25:28–42. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2013.23057

  • Li N, Ke X (2011) Evaluation index and TOPSIS analysis of service quality of rural township health centers in Sichuan. Chin J Health Manag 28:776–778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2009) Study on the external evaluation of health service quality of township health centers in 47 centers in Shanxi Province. Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi

    Google Scholar 

  • Pembe AB, Carlstedt A, Urassa DP, Lindmark G, Nyström L, Darj E (2010) Quality of antenatal care in rural tanzania: counselling on pregnancy danger signs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puett C, Coates J, Alderman H, Sadler K (2013) Quality of care for severe acute malnutrition delivered by community health workers in southern Bangladesh. Matern Child Nutr 9:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00409.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve C, Humphreys J, Wakerman J (2015) A comprehensive health service evaluation and monitoring framework. Eval Program Plann 53:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt TC (2000) The world health report 2000-health systems: improving performance. Bull World Health Organ 78:1064

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh BT, Mobeen N, Azam SI, Rabbani F (2008) Using SERVQUAL for assessing and improving patient satisfaction at a rural health facility in Pakistan. East Mediterr Health J14:447–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao MH (2010) Study on rural public health service system in Heilongjiang. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma JK, Narang R (2011) Quality of healthcare services in rural India: the user perspective. Vikalpa J Decis Makers 36:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Jones JA (2006) Essential tips for measuring levels of consumer satisfaction with rural health service quality. Rural Remote Health 6:594–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L (2011) The influences of patient's trust in medical service and attitude towards health policy on patient's overall satisfaction with medical service and sub satisfaction in China. BMC Public Health 11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tham R, Humphreys J, Kinsman L, Buykx P, Asaid A, Tuohey K (2010) Evaluating the impact of sustainable comprehensive primary health care on rural health. Aust J Rural Health 18:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01145.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tham R, Humphreys JS, Kinsman L, Buykx P, Asaid A, Tuohey K (2011) Study protocol: evaluating the impact of a rural Australian primary health care service on rural health. BMC Health Serv Res 11:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C (2014) Evidence based medical classification system. Integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine evidence based medicine conference materials. CNKI Database

  • Wang J, Zhang L, Feng Z, Niu H, Zhang X (2007) Study on service quality evaluation system of rural township hospital. Chin J Hosp Manag 23:83–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang X, Liu X, Yang J, Peng Y (2014) Discussion on the fracture and bridge of rural health policy from the operation mechanism of village health room. Soft Sci Health 28:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Fang H, Bishwajit G, Xiang, Fu H, Fen Z (2015) Evaluation of rural primary health care in western China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:13843–13860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113843

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2008) The World Health Report 2008: primary health care-now more than ever. http://www.who.int/whr/2008/en. Accessed 20 Sept 2016

  • Xiong J (2008) Study on the performance evaluation of township health centers in rural areas. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi M (2013) WHO reaffirms the importance of national health policies, strategies and programmes. Chin J Health Policy 6:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2007) National Bureau of statistics according to the sample survey data: China's rural population accounts for 56% of the total population. Rural Pract Sci Technol Inf 12:58

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Hu H, Liu T (2012) Rural environmental health service supply DEA model of Yunnan Ruili area based on performance evaluation. Seventh China Management Annual Meeting of the public management branch. CNKI Database

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the China Medical Board (CMB, grant no. CMB 10–029) and supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (16LZUJBWTD013): Evidence-based sociology research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the CMB. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data synthesis, data interpretation or writing of the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiliang Zhu or Kehu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study. If you do not wish to publicly share your data, please write: “Please contact the author for data requests.”

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: Due to the existence of another journal with the same name, the Publisher has added a subtitle, “From Theory to Practice.” Effective as of January 2018, the new title of this Journal is Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice.

Xiuxia Li and Lili Wei are joint first authors

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0893-1.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Wei, L., Shang, W. et al. Trace and evaluation systems for health services quality in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. J Public Health 26, 127–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0858-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0858-4

Keywords

Navigation