Abstract
In this work, the effects of 103 bilateral regional trade agreements (RTAs: partial scope agreements — PSAs — and free trade agreements — FTAs) are studied in a dynamic way. The analysis of quarterly trade flows from Q4-1982 to Q4-2018 shows dynamic differences between RTAs and among trade partners. Results show that countries benefit unevenly from bilateral RTAs and that their economic size is not determinant. The positive global trade trend since the 1990s and the negative effect of the 2008 economic crisis are captured by the factor analysis in order to study specifically how trade agreements affect bilateral trade asymmetrically. On average, RTAs promote a 10% increase in bilateral trade flows above the mean trend, but PSAs tend to enhance bilateral trade more than FTAs (21% compared to 9%). Additionally, PSAs gather most of the effects during the first four quarters after the agreements are enforced whereas FTAs have longer effects over time. The current study allows a classification of bilateral trade series in homogeneous groups according to the dynamic impact of the bilateral RTAs by the means of a cluster analysis. Heterogeneity between clusters is therefore explored. Moreover, a difference concerning the economic crisis starting in 2008 is noticed: overall, for agreements in force before 2008, their impact on bilateral trade is positive (30%) while it is negative for agreements signed after 2008 (− 9%). This indicates that RTAs play a heterogeneous role as a smoothing cycle mechanism. Finally, evidence of the anticipation effect is found.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The differences of variables that stay almost at the same level over time are closed to zero.
Exports are expressed in f.o.b while imports are expressed in c.i.f. According to the IMF: “Exports from Country A to B should be equal to the imports of Country B from A, after taking into account the insurance and freight costs under the generally observed case that Country B imports are valued on a c.i.f. basis”.
The start of the 2008 global economic crisis is taken to be on September 15th, 2008, date of the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
References
Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2004) Economic determinants of free trade agreements. J Int Econ 64(1):29–63
Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? J Int Econ 71(1):72–95
Baier SL, Bergstrand JH, Clance MW (2018) Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements. J Dev Econ 135:587–608
Baier SL, Yotov YV, Zylkin T (2019) On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: lessons from twenty years of trade integration. J Int Econ 116:206–226
Box GE, Tiao GC (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Amer Stat Assoc 70(349):70–79
Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC, Ljung GM (2015) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Wiley
Dai M, Yotov YV, Zylkin T (2014) On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Econ Lett 122(2):321–325
Fraley C, Raftery AE (2002) Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 97(458):611–631
Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004a) Are regional trading arrangements trade creating?: An application of extreme bounds analysis. J Int Econ 63(2):369–395
Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004b) Does trade creation measure up? A reexamination of the effects of regional trading arrangements. Econom Lett 82(2):213–219
Kohl T (2014) Do we really know that trade agreements increase trade? Rev World Econ 150(3):443–469
Kohl T, Brakman S, Garretsen H (2016) Do trade agreements stimulate international trade differently? evidence from 296 trade agreements. The World Econ 39(1):97–131
McLaren J (1997) Size, sunk costs, and Judge Bowker’s objection to free trade. Am Econ Rev, 400–420
Peña D, Box GE (1987) Identifying a simplifying structure in time series. J Am Stat Assoc 82(399):836–843
Rodrik D (2018) What do trade agreements really do? J Econ Perspect 32(2):73–90
Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. J Am Stat Assoc 97(460):1167–1179
Subramanian A, Wei SJ (2007) The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. J Int Econ 72(1):151–175
Tomz M, Goldstein JL, Rivers D (2007) Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? Comment. Am Econ Rev, 2005–2018
Vicard V (2011) Determinants of successful regional trade agreements. Econ Lett 111(3):188–190
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiménez-García, B., Rodríguez, J. A time series approach to study the dynamic effects of bilateral trade agreements. Int Econ Econ Policy 19, 615–643 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-022-00529-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-022-00529-6