Skip to main content
Log in

A time series approach to study the dynamic effects of bilateral trade agreements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Economics and Economic Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the effects of 103 bilateral regional trade agreements (RTAs: partial scope agreements — PSAs — and free trade agreements — FTAs) are studied in a dynamic way. The analysis of quarterly trade flows from Q4-1982 to Q4-2018 shows dynamic differences between RTAs and among trade partners. Results show that countries benefit unevenly from bilateral RTAs and that their economic size is not determinant. The positive global trade trend since the 1990s and the negative effect of the 2008 economic crisis are captured by the factor analysis in order to study specifically how trade agreements affect bilateral trade asymmetrically. On average, RTAs promote a 10% increase in bilateral trade flows above the mean trend, but PSAs tend to enhance bilateral trade more than FTAs (21% compared to 9%). Additionally, PSAs gather most of the effects during the first four quarters after the agreements are enforced whereas FTAs have longer effects over time. The current study allows a classification of bilateral trade series in homogeneous groups according to the dynamic impact of the bilateral RTAs by the means of a cluster analysis. Heterogeneity between clusters is therefore explored. Moreover, a difference concerning the economic crisis starting in 2008 is noticed: overall, for agreements in force before 2008, their impact on bilateral trade is positive (30%) while it is negative for agreements signed after 2008 (− 9%). This indicates that RTAs play a heterogeneous role as a smoothing cycle mechanism. Finally, evidence of the anticipation effect is found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The differences of variables that stay almost at the same level over time are closed to zero.

  2. Exports are expressed in f.o.b while imports are expressed in c.i.f. According to the IMF: “Exports from Country A to B should be equal to the imports of Country B from A, after taking into account the insurance and freight costs under the generally observed case that Country B imports are valued on a c.i.f. basis”.

  3. The start of the 2008 global economic crisis is taken to be on September 15th, 2008, date of the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

References

  • Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2004) Economic determinants of free trade agreements. J Int Econ 64(1):29–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? J Int Econ 71(1):72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier SL, Bergstrand JH, Clance MW (2018) Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements. J Dev Econ 135:587–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier SL, Yotov YV, Zylkin T (2019) On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: lessons from twenty years of trade integration. J Int Econ 116:206–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Tiao GC (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Amer Stat Assoc 70(349):70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC, Ljung GM (2015) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Wiley

  • Dai M, Yotov YV, Zylkin T (2014) On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Econ Lett 122(2):321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley C, Raftery AE (2002) Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 97(458):611–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004a) Are regional trading arrangements trade creating?: An application of extreme bounds analysis. J Int Econ 63(2):369–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004b) Does trade creation measure up? A reexamination of the effects of regional trading arrangements. Econom Lett 82(2):213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl T (2014) Do we really know that trade agreements increase trade? Rev World Econ 150(3):443–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl T, Brakman S, Garretsen H (2016) Do trade agreements stimulate international trade differently? evidence from 296 trade agreements. The World Econ 39(1):97–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren J (1997) Size, sunk costs, and Judge Bowker’s objection to free trade. Am Econ Rev, 400–420

  • Peña D, Box GE (1987) Identifying a simplifying structure in time series. J Am Stat Assoc 82(399):836–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (2018) What do trade agreements really do? J Econ Perspect 32(2):73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. J Am Stat Assoc 97(460):1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian A, Wei SJ (2007) The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. J Int Econ 72(1):151–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomz M, Goldstein JL, Rivers D (2007) Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? Comment. Am Econ Rev, 2005–2018

  • Vicard V (2011) Determinants of successful regional trade agreements. Econ Lett 111(3):188–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blanca Jiménez-García.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiménez-García, B., Rodríguez, J. A time series approach to study the dynamic effects of bilateral trade agreements. Int Econ Econ Policy 19, 615–643 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-022-00529-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-022-00529-6

Keywords

Navigation