Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling paddy field subsurface drainage using HYDRUS-2D

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All of steady and non-steady subsurface drainage equations were developed mostly based on water flow pattern in an ordinary field conditions. However, subsurface drainage in a paddy field is quite different from subsurface drainage in an ordinary field. Thus, it is necessary to develop new equations and mathematical models to design subsurface drainage system in a paddy field. The objective of this study was to apply the HYDRUS-2D model, based on the Richard’s equation, to simulate water flow under subsurface drainage in a paddy field for various drain depths (0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 m) and spacings (7.5 and 15.0 m), surface soil textures (clay loam and silty clay loam) and crack conditions. Simulation results were compared with two well-known drainage equations. The maximum drainage rate was obtained under 7.5-m spacings and 1-m depth. With increasing drain spacings, the drainage rate decreased. Drain spacings had more effect on drainage rate and water pressure head as compared to drain depth. Drainage rates calculated by the Hooghoudt’s and Murashima and Ogino’s equations were much lower than those calculated by the Richard’s equation. The Hooghoudt’s equation, developed for ordinary fields, did not perform well for paddy fields. This study also proved the importance of cracks in subsurface drainage system of paddy fields. HYDRUS-2D stands as a robust tool for designing subsurface drainage in a paddy field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boivin A, Šimůnek J, Schiavon M, van Genuchten MT (2006) Comparison of pesticide transport processes in three tile-drained field soils using HYDRUS-2D. Vadose Zone J 5(3):838–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crevoisier D, Popova Z, Mailhol JC, Ruelle P (2008) Assessment and simulation of water and nitrogen transfer under furrow irrigation. Agric Water Manag 95(4):354–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi-Naftchally A, Mirlatifi SM, Asgari A (2013) Comparison of steady-and unsteady-state drainage equations for determination of subsurface drain spacing in paddy fields: a case study in Northern Iran. Paddy Water Environ 12:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimian H, Parsinejad M, Liaghat A, Akram M (2011) Field research on the performance of a rice husk envelope in a subsurface drainage system (case study Behshahr, Iran). Irrig Drain 60(2):216–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Parsinejad M, Playán E, Abbasi F, Navabian M (2013) Simulation of 1D surface and 2D subsurface water flow and nitrate transport in alternate and conventional furrow fertigation. Irrig Sci 31(3):310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghoudt SB (1940) General consideration of the problem of field drainage by parallel drains, ditches, watercourses, and channels. Publication No.7 in the series contribution to the knowledge of some physical parameters of the soil. Bodemkundig Instituut, Groningen

  • Kroes JG, Van Dam JC (2003) Reference Manual SWAP version 3.0.3. Wageningen, Alterra, Green World Research. Alterra-report 773

  • Monjezi MS, Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Moradi MA (2013) Soil wetting front in surface and subsurface drip irrigation for silty loam soil. ICE Water Manag 166(5):272–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12(3):513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murashima K, Ogino Y (1985) Design of pipe drainage using the modification coefficient (a). Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 119:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashima K, Ogino Y (1992) Comparative study on steady and non-steady state formulae of subsurface drain spacing—design on subsurface drainage of paddies (1). Bull Univ Osaka Prefect Ser B 44:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogino Y, Ota S (2007) The evolution of Japan’s rice field drainage and development of technology. Irrig Drain 56(1):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phogat V, Yadav AK, Malik RS, Kumar S, Cox J (2010) Simulation of salt and water movement and estimation of water productivity of rice crop irrigated with saline water. Paddy Water Environ 8(4):333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provenzano G (2007) Using HYDRUS-2D simulation model to evaluate wetted soil volume in subsurface drip irrigation systems. Irrig drain Eng 133(4):342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šimůnek J, Sejna M, van Genuchten MT (1999) The HYDRUS-2D software package for simulating the two dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media Version 2.0, IGWMC-TPS-700. International Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

  • Skaggs RW (1980) Drainmod reference report, methods for design and evaluation of drainage water management systems for soils with high water tables. USDA, SCS, North Carolina State University, Raliegh, p 185

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedema LK, Vlotman WF, Rycroft D (2004) Modern land drainage: planning, design and management of agricultural drainage systems. Taylor & Francis, The Netherlands, p 449

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabuchi T (2004) Improvement of paddy field drainage for mechanization. Paddy Water Environ 2(1):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamed Ebrahimian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimian, H., Noory, H. Modeling paddy field subsurface drainage using HYDRUS-2D. Paddy Water Environ 13, 477–485 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-014-0465-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-014-0465-8

Keywords

Navigation