Skip to main content
Log in

A new approach to selecting a regionalized design hyetograph by principal component analysis and analytic hierarchy process

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing storm hyetographs is the essential element of hydrologic modeling analysis and storm water drainage design. In order to reasonably use storm hyetograph design in an un-gauged area, a regional representative hyetograph from an alternative and uniform area must be found. A new approach is proposed in this study to select a regional design storm hyetograph using principal component analysis (PCA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The proposed approach combines both PCA and cluster analysis techniques. Furthermore, the AHP method is also used to establish the regional design hyetograph. A case study applied in the area of northern Taiwan shows that our method can successfully categorize the area into three homogenous zones. A representative regional hyetograph can be obtained by selecting the largest priority vector or by the weighted average of rain gauges in each zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfieri L, Laio F, Claps P (2008) A simulation experiment for optimal design hyetograph selection. Hydrol Process 22:813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng KS, Hueter I, Hsu EC, Yeh HC (2001) A scale-invariant Gauss-Markov model for design storm hyetographs. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(3):723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson PS (1970) Dynamic hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu NS, Kuo CL, Lin WT (2010) The application of analytic hierarchy process on storm hyetograph. J Chin Inst Civil Hydraul Eng 22(2):151–158 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff FA (1967) Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms. Water Resour Res 3(4):1007–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall International, Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Keifer CJ, Chu HH (1957) Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design. J Hydraul Div ASCE 83(4):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaragiri SR, Pillai CRS (1999) Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development. Eur J Oper Res 112:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KT, Ho JY (2008) Design hyetograph for typhoon rainstorms in Taiwan. J Hydrol Eng 13(7):647–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy JK, Hartmann J, Li KW, An Y, Asgray A (2007) Multi-criteria decision support systems for flood hazard mitigation and emergency response in urban watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43(2):346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SW, Sun CH (1998) Integration of multi-criteria decision making technique and geographic information system. J Geogr Sci 24:29–42 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin GF, Wu MC (2007) A SOM-based approach to estimating design hyetographs at ungauged sites. J Hydrol 339:216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin GF, Chen LH, Kao SC (2005) Development of regional design hyetographs. Hydrol Process 19:937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin GF, Wu MC, Chen GR, Liu SJ (2010) Construction of design hyetographs for locations without observed data. Hydrol Process 24:481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjanovic M, Kovacevic BBM (2009) Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2009 international conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems, pp 273–278

  • Millet I, Wedley WC (2002) Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criter Decision Anal 11:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim DH, Cordery I (1975) Rainfall temporal patterns for design floods. J Hydraul Div ASCE 101(1):81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell DN, Khan AA, Aziz NM (2008) Impact of new rainfall patterns on detention pond design. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(2):197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao DV, Clapp D (1986) Rainfall analysis for northern florida, part I: 24-hour to 10-day maximum rainfall data. Technical publication SJ 86-3. St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MD

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veneziano D, Villani P (1999) Best linear unbiased design hyetograph. Water Resour Res 35(9):2725–2738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William HA, Johnathan RB, Lynne SF (2003) A triangular model of dimensionless runoff producing rainfall hyetographs in Texas. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(4):911–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SJ, Yang JC, Tung YK (2006) Identification and stochastic generation of representative rainfall temporal patterns in Hong Kong territory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CH (2001) Study on rain gauge network assessment for reconstruction area. Final Report of Department of Land Management, 4-1-4-33 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Yoo KE, Choi YC (2006) Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports. J Air Transp Manage 12:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Xu J (2010) Combing AHP with GIS for evaluating environmental carrying capacity in Shaanxi Province, China. In: Proceedings of 2010 international conference on challenges in environmental science and computer engineering, pp 3–6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiang Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeh, HC., Chen, YC. & Wei, C. A new approach to selecting a regionalized design hyetograph by principal component analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Paddy Water Environ 11, 73–85 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-011-0294-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-011-0294-y

Keywords

Navigation