Skip to main content
Log in

Ephemeris monitor with ambiguity resolution for CAT II/III GBAS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In safety-critical applications, such as the Ground-Based Augmentation System for precision approaches in civil aviation, it is important to safeguard users under the case of ephemeris failures. For CAT II/III approaches, different ephemeris monitors with approaches for ambiguity resolution are proposed with the double differenced carrier phase as the test statistics. The continuity risks introduced by the ambiguity resolution are addressed by deriving the required averaging time for new, acquired, and re-acquired satellites. Since the ephemeris fault is closely related with the baseline length between ground stations, the minimum baseline length is derived to meet the probability of missed detection region. Current methods are compared with both the averaging time and the ground baseline length. It is demonstrated that a combination of two methods is able to achieve the best performance with 94 averaging epochs and 218 m ground baseline length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting this research is from the Hong Kong Geodetic Survey Services (SatRef) and can be obtained from https://www.geodetic.gov.hk/en/index.htm.

References

  • Annex-10 (2018) Volume 1, Aeronautical telecommunications - radio navigation aids (7 edn.). International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Seventh Edition

  • Brenner M, Liu F (2010) Ranging source fault detection performance for category III GBAS. In: Proc. ION GNSS 2010, Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, USA, September 21–24, 2618–2632

  • Gratton L, Pervan B, Pullen S (2004) Orbit ephemeris monitors for category I LAAS. PLANS 2004. In: Position location and navigation symposium, Monterey, CA, USA, pp 429–438

  • Gratton L, Pramanik R, Tang H, Pervan B (2007) Ephemeris failure rate analysis and its impact on category I LAAS integrity. In: Proc. ION GNSS 2007, institute of navigation, fort worth, TX, USA, September 25–28, 386–394

  • Guilbert A, Milner C, Macabiau C (2017) Characterization of tropospheric gradients for the ground-based augmentation system through the use of numerical weather models. Navigation 64(4):475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Milner C, Macabiau C (2017) Code-carrier divergence for dual frequency GBAS. GPS Solut 21(2):769–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanafseh S, Yang FC, Pervan B, Pullen S, Warburton J (2012) Carrier phase ionospheric gradient ground monitor for GBAS with experimental validation. J Navig 59(1):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanafseh S, Patel J, Pervan B (2017) Ephemeris monitor for GBAS using multiple baseline antennas with experimental validation. In: Proc. ION GNSS + 2017, Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, USA, September 25–28, 4197–4209

  • Matsumoto S, Pullen S, Rotkowitz M, Pervan B (1999) GPS ephemeris verification for local area augmentation system (LAAS) ground stations. In: Proc. ION GPS 1999, Institute of Navigation, Alexandria, VA, USA, September 14–17, 691–704

  • Patel J, Khanafseh S, Pervan B (2020) Detecting hazardous spatial gradients at satellite acquisition in GBAS. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2020.2969541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan B, Chan FC (2003) Detecting global positioning satellite ephemeris errors using short-baseline carrier phase measurements. J Guid Control Dyn 26(1):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan B, Gratton L (2005) Orbit ephemeris monitors for local area differential GPS. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 41(2):449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen S, Lee J, Luo M, Pervan B, Chan F, Gratton L (2001) Ephemeris protection level equations and monitor algorithms for GBAS. In: Proc. ION GPS 2001, Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, September 11–14, 1738–1749

  • SARPs (2009) GBAS CAT II/III Development Baseline SARPs. ICAO NSP. http://www.icao.int/safety/airnavigation/documents/gnss_cat_ii_iii.pdf

  • Tang H, Pullen S, Enge P, Gratton L, Pervan B, Brenner M, Scheitlin J, Kline P (2010) Ephemeris Type A fault analysis and mitigation for LAAS. In: IEEE/ION position, location and navigation symposium, Indian Wells, CA, May 4–6, 654–666

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is funded by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University under the scheme of the next generation GNSS integrity monitoring for civil aviation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiping Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: residual ambiguities

Appendix: residual ambiguities

For the PC_ALT method under WA,

$$\hat{N}_{w}^{ij} - N_{w}^{ij} = \left| {\left[ {\frac{{\emptyset_{w}^{ij} - R_{n}^{ij} }}{{\lambda_{w} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} - N_{w}^{ij} } \right| \le 1$$
(a1)

the maximum residual Nw bounded by (9) is assumed to be 1. Similarly,

$$\left| {\left[ {\frac{{\emptyset_{1}^{ij} - \emptyset_{5}^{ij} - \lambda_{5} N_{w}^{ij} }}{{\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{5} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} - N_{1}^{ij} } \right| \le 1$$
(a2)

where the maximum residual N1 is also 1 assuming the correct \(N_{w}^{ij}\) input. Therefore, the residual ambiguity in the test statistics is 5N1 with the PC_ALT method,

$$\begin{aligned} & \left| {\left[ {\frac{{\emptyset_{1}^{ij} - \emptyset_{5}^{ij} - \lambda_{5} \hat{N}_{w}^{ij} }}{{\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{5} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} - N_{1}^{ij} } \right| \le \left| {\left[ {\frac{{\emptyset_{1}^{ij} - \emptyset_{5}^{ij} - \lambda_{5} N_{w}^{ij} }}{{\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{5} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} \pm \left[ {\frac{{\lambda_{5} }}{{\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{5} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} - N_{1}^{ij} } \right| \\ & \quad \le \left| {\left[ {\frac{{\emptyset_{1}^{ij} - \emptyset_{5}^{ij} - \lambda_{5} N_{w}^{ij} }}{{\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{5} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} - N_{1}^{ij} } \right| \pm \left| {\left[ {\frac{{\lambda_{5} }}{{\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{5} }}} \right]_{\text{round}} } \right| \le 5 \\ \end{aligned}$$
(a3)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Y. Ephemeris monitor with ambiguity resolution for CAT II/III GBAS. GPS Solut 24, 116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01028-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01028-4

Keywords

Navigation