Skip to main content
Log in

An optimal linear combination model to accelerate PPP convergence using multi-frequency multi-GNSS measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose an optimal ionospheric-free linear combination (LC) model for dual- and triple-frequency PPP which can accelerate carrier phase ambiguity and decrease the position solution convergence time. To reduce computational complexity, a near-optimal LC model for triple-frequency PPP is also proposed. The uncombined observation (UC) model estimating ionospheric delay gives the best performance, because all information contained within the observations are kept. The proposed optimal and near-optimal LC models are compared with the UC model, using both simulated and real data from five GNSS stations in Australia over 30 consecutive days in 2017. We determine a necessary and sufficient condition for a combination operator matrix which can eliminate the first-order ionospheric component to obtain the optimal LC model for dual- and triple-frequency PPP. Numerical results show that the proposed LC model is identical to the UC model. In addition, the proposed near-optimal LC model even outperforms the current LC models. Ambiguity resolution (AR) is faster and positioning accuracy is improved using the optimal triple-frequency LC model compared to using the optimal dual-frequency LC model. An average time-to-first-fix of 10 min with a fixing success rate of 95% can be achieved with triple-frequency AR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brack A (2017) Reliable GPS + BDS RTK positioning with partial ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 21(3):1083–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, He C, Santerre R, Pan L, Cui X, Zhu J (2016) A comparative analysis of measurement noise and multipath for four constellations: GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo. Surv Rev 48(349):287–295. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocard M, Bourgon S, Kamali O, Collins P (2008) A systematic investigation of optimal carrier-phase combinations for modernized triple-frequency GPS. J Geodesy 82(9):555–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0201-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins P, Bisnath S (2011) Issues in ambiguity resolution for precise point positioning. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, September 20–23, pp 679–687

  • Duong V, Harima K, Choy S, Rizos C (2016) Performance of precise point positioning using current triple-frequency GPS measurements in Australia. In: Proceedings of IGNSS 2016, International Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Sydney, Australia, December 6–8, 1–15

  • El-Mowafy A, Deo M, Rizos C (2016) On biases in precise point positioning with multi-constellation and multi-frequency GNSS data. Meas Sci Technol 27(3):035102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/3/035102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y (2008) GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution using ionosphere-reduced virtual signals. J Geodesy 82(12):847–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0209-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geodesy 82(7):389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng JH, Bock Y (2013) Triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning with rapid ambiguity resolution. J Geodesy 87(5):449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0619-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng JH, Meng XL, Dodson AH, Ge MR, Teferle FN (2010) Rapid re-convergences to ambiguity-fixed solutions in precise point positioning. J Geodesy 84(12):705–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0404-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Li X, Zhang X, Wang J (2017) Assessment of precise orbit and clock products for Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS from IGS multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX). GPS Solut 21(1):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0523-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch R (1983) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of international geodetic symposium on satellite doppler positioning, Las Cruces, NM, New Mexico State University, February 8–12, pp 1213–1231

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Wasle E (2008) GNSS—global navigation satellite systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-73017-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Blot A (2016) Fast PPP convergence using multi-constellation and triple-frequency ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2016, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, September 12–16, pp 2082–2088

  • Laurichesse D, Flavien M, Jean-Paul B, Patrick B, Luca C (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2009.tb01750.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP (2010) Real-time PPP with undifferenced integer ambiguity resolution, experimental results. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2010, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, September 21–24, pp 2534–2544

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119018612

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang J, Laurichesse D (2013) Modeling and quality control for reliable precise point positioning integer ambiguity resolution with GNSS modernization. GPS Solut 18(3):429–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0342-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne W (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville, Maryland, April 15–19, pp 373–386

  • Montenbruck O et al (2017) The multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS)—achievements, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Arora BS, Teunissen PJ (2014) Predicting the success rate of long-baseline GPS + Galileo (partial) ambiguity resolution. J Navig 67(3):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Grafarend E (1986) Generating classes of equivalent linear models by nuisance parameter. Manuscripta Geodaetica 11(4):262–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen X (2002) Improving ambiguity convergence in carrier phase-based precise point positioning. University of Calgary, Department of Geomatics Engineering

  • Takasu T (2013) RTKLIB ver. 2.4.2 manual, RTKLIB: an open source program package for GNSS positioning. Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (1994) A new method for fast carrier phase ambiguity estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE 1994: position location and navigation symposium, April 11–15, pp 562–573. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.1994.303362

  • Teunissen PJG (2001) Integer estimation in the presence of biases. J Geodesy 75(7–8):399–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, de Bakker PF (2013) Single-receiver single-channel multi-frequency GNSS integrity: outliers, slips, and ionospheric disturbances. J Geodesy 87(2):161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0588-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Khodabandeh A (2014) Review and principles of PPP-RTK methods. J Geodesy 89(3):217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0771-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P, Joosten P, Tiberius C (1999) Geometry-free ambiguity success rates in case of partial fixing. Proceedings of ION NTM 1999, San Diego, CA, pp 25–27

  • Van Der Marel H, De Bakker P (2012) Single versus dual-frequency precise point positioning: what are the tradeoffs between using L1-only and L1 + L2 for PPP? Inside GNSS 1:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen S, Li B (2012) LAMBDA software package: matlab implementation, version 3.0. Mathematical geodesy and positioning, Delft University of Technology and Curtin University, Perth, Australia

  • Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2013) The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 17(4):535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0299-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Rothacher M (2013) Ambiguity resolution for triple-frequency geometry-free and ionospheric-free combination tested with real data. J Geodesy 87(6):539–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0630-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L, Beer S (2015) BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy. GPS Solut 19(4):639–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0423-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wubbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI 4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, US Department of Commerce, Rockville, Maryland, April 15–19, pp 403–412

  • Xiang Y, Gao Y, Shi J, Xu C (2017) Carrier phase-based ionospheric observables using PPP models. Geodesy Geodyn 8(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Geoscience Australia, CNES and the IGS are acknowledged for providing the GNSS data from the Australian Regional GNSS Network as well as the satellite orbits, clocks and biases. Raijin-NCI National Computational Infrastructure Australia is acknowledged for providing high-performance research computing resources for GNSS data processing. The authors thank the Editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which have improved the paper significantly. The first author is supported by the Australia Award Scholarship Scheme to pursue a Ph.D. at RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viet Duong.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duong, V., Harima, K., Choy, S. et al. An optimal linear combination model to accelerate PPP convergence using multi-frequency multi-GNSS measurements. GPS Solut 23, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0842-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0842-2

Keywords

Navigation