Abstract
Cells are able to respond to mechanical forces and deformations. The actin cytoskeleton, a highly dynamic scaffolding structure, plays an important role in cell mechano-sensing. Thus, understanding rheological behaviors of the actin cytoskeleton is critical for delineating mechanical behaviors of cells. The actin cytoskeleton consists of interconnected actin filaments (F-actin) that form via self-assembly of actin monomers. It has been shown that molecular changes of the monomer subunits impact the rigidity of F-actin. However, it remains inconclusive whether or not the molecular changes can propagate to the network level and thus alter the rheological properties of actin networks. Here, we focus on how cation binding and nucleotide state tune the molecular conformation and rigidity of F-actin and a representative rheological behavior of actin networks, strain-stiffening. We employ a multiscale approach by combining established computational techniques: molecular dynamics, normal mode analysis and Brownian dynamics. Our findings indicate that different combinations of nucleotide (ATP, ADP or ADP-Pi) and cation \((\hbox {Mg}^{2+}\) or \(\hbox {Ca}^{2+}\) at one or multiple sites) binding change the molecular conformation of F-actin by varying inter- and intra-strand interactions which bridge adjacent subunits between and within F-actin helical strands. This is reflected in the rigidity of actin filaments against bending and stretching. We found that differences in extension and bending rigidity of F-actin induced by cation binding to the low-, intermediate- and high-affinity sites vary the strain-stiffening response of actin networks crosslinked by rigid crosslinkers, such as scruin, whereas they minimally impact the strain-stiffening response when compliant crosslinkers, such as filamin A or \(\upalpha \)-actinin, are used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamovic I, Mijailovich SM, Karplus M (2008) The elastic properties of the structurally characterized myosin II S2 subdomain: a molecular dynamics and normal mode analysis. Biophys J 94:3779–3789. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.122028
Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL et al (2001) Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 80:505–515. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76033-X
Bahar I, Rader AJ (2005) Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:586–592. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2005.08.007
Bausch AR, Möller W, Sackmann E (1999) Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. Biophys J 76:573–579. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77225-5
Belmont LD, Orlova A, Drubin DG, Egelman EH (1999) A change in actin conformation associated with filament instability after Pi release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:29–34. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.1.29
Borisy GG, Svitkina TM (2000) Actin machinery: pushing the envelope. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:104–112. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00063-0
Broedersz CP, Mackintosh FC (2014) Modeling semiflexible polymer networks. Rev Mod Phys 86:995–1036. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.995
Bunnell SC, Kapoor V, Trible RP et al (2001) Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. Immunity 14:315–329. doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00112-1
Carlier M, Pantaloni D, Korn E (1987) The mechanisms of ATP hydrolysis accompanying the polymerization of Mg-actin and Ca-actin. J Biol Chem 262:3052–3059
Carlier MF, Pantaloni D, Korn ED (1986) The effects of Mg\(^{2+}\) at the high-affinity and low-affinity sites on the polymerization of actin and associated ATP hydrolysis. J Biol Chem 261:10785–10792
Chennubhotla C, Rader AJ, Yang L-W, Bahar I (2005) Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies. Phys Biol 2:S173–S180. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/2/4/S12
Chu J-W, Voth GA (2006a) Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations. Biophys J 90:1572–1582. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.073924
Chu J-W, Voth GA (2005) Allostery of actin filaments: molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13111–13116. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503732102
Chu J-W, Voth GA (2006b) Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations. Biophys J 90:1572–1582. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.073924
Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME (2005) Bubbles, drops, and particles. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY
Cooper JA, Buhle EL, Walker SB et al (1983) Kinetic evidence for a monomer activation step in actin polymerization. Biochemistry 22:2193–2202. doi:10.1021/bi00278a021
De La Cruz EM, Roland J, McCullough BR et al (2010) Origin of twist-bend coupling in actin filaments. Biophys J 99:1852–1860. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.009
Deriu MA, Bidone TC, Mastrangelo F et al (2011) Biomechanics of actin filaments: a computational multi-level study. J Biomech 44:630–636. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.014
Deriu MA, Shkurti A, Paciello G et al (2012) Multiscale modeling of cellular actin filaments: from atomistic molecular to coarse-grained dynamics. Proteins 80:1598–1609. doi:10.1002/prot.24053
Doruker P, Atilgan AR, Bahar I (2000) Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to alpha-amylase inhibitor. Proteins 40:512–524
Durand P, Trinquier G, Sanejouand YH (1994) A new approach for determining low-frequency normal modes in macromolecules. Biopolymers 34:759–771. doi:10.1002/bip.360340608
Düttmann M, Mittnenzweig M, Togashi Y et al (2012) Complex intramolecular mechanics of G-actin—an elastic network study. PLoS One 7:e45859. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045859
Dykeman EC, Sankey OF (2010) Normal mode analysis and applications in biological physics. J Phys Condens Matter 22:423202. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/42/423202
Estes JE, Selden LA, Gershman LC (1987) Tight binding of divalent cations to monomeric actin. Binding kinetics support a simplified model. J Biol Chem 262:4952–4957. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78232-8
Estes JE, Selden LA, Kinosian HJ, Gershman LC (1992a) Tightly-bound divalent cation of actin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 13:272–284. doi:10.1007/BF01766455
Fan J, Saunders MG, Voth GA (2012) Coarse-graining provides insights on the essential nature of heterogeneity in actin filaments. Biophys J 103:1334–1342. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.029
Flynn TC, Ma J (2004) Theoretical analysis of twist/bend ratio and mechanical moduli of bacterial flagellar hook and filament. Biophys J 86:3204–3210. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74368-4
Fujii T, Iwane AH, Yanagida T, Namba K (2010) Direct visualization of secondary structures of F-actin by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 467:724–728. doi:10.2142/biophys.51.260
Gardel ML, Nakamura F, Hartwig J et al (2006a) Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. Phys Rev Lett 96:088102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.088102
Gardel ML, Nakamura F, Hartwig JH et al (2006b) Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1762–1767. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504777103
Gittes F, Mickey B, Nettleton J, Howard J (1993) Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J Cell Biol 120:923–934. doi:10.1083/jcb.120.4.923
Golji J, Collins R, Mofrad MRK (2009) Molecular mechanics of the \(\alpha \)-actinin rod domain: bending, torsional, and extensional behavior. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000389. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000389
Grooman B, Fujiwara I, Otey C, Upadhyaya A (2012) Morphology and viscoelasticity of actin networks formed with the mutually interacting crosslinkers: palladin and alpha-actinin. PLoS One 7:e42773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042773
Grudinin S, Redon S (2010) Practical modeling of molecular systems with symmetries. J Comput Chem 31:1799–1814. doi:10.1002/jcc.21434
Guan J-Q, Almo SC, Reisler E, Chance MR (2003) Structural reorganization of proteins revealed by radiolysis and mass spectrometry: G-actin solution structure is divalent cation dependent. Biochemistry 42:11992–12000. doi:10.1021/bi034914k
Head DA, Levine AJ, MacKintosh FC (2003) Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 68:061907. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061907
Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM (1997) LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18:1463–1472. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H
Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447. doi:10.1021/ct700301q
Hild G, Nyitrai M, Belágyi J, Somogyi B (1998) The influence of divalent cations on the dynamic properties of actin filaments: a spectroscopic study. Biophys J 75:3015–3022. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77742-2
Hinsen K (2005) Normal mode theory and harmonic potential approximations. Norm Mode Anal Theory Appl Biol Chem Syst. 1–16. doi:10.1201/9781420035070.ch1
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38. doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Isambert H, Venier P, Maggs AC et al (1995) Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins. J Biol Chem 270:11437–11444. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.19.11437
Janmey PA (1996) The polyelectrolyte nature of F-actin and the mechanism of actin bundle formation. J Biol Chem 271:8556–8563. doi:10.1074/jbc.271.15.8556
Kabsch W, Mannherz HG, Suck D et al (1990) Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex. Nature 347:37–44. doi:10.1038/347037a0
Kang H, Bradley MJ, McCullough BR et al (2012) Identification of cation-binding sites on actin that drive polymerization and modulate bending stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16923–16927. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211078109
Kim T (2014) Determinants of contractile forces generated in disorganized actomyosin bundles. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. doi:10.1007/s10237-014-0608-2
Kim T, Hwang W, Kamm RD (2009a) Computational analysis of a cross-linked actin-like network. Exp Mech 49:91–104. doi:10.1007/s11340-007-9091-3
Kim T, Hwang W, Lee H, Kamm RD (2009b) Computational analysis of viscoelastic properties of crosslinked actin networks. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000439. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000439
Kim T, Hwang W, Kamm RD (2011) Dynamic role of cross-linking proteins in actin rheology. Biophys J 101:1597–1603. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.033
Kojima H, Ishijima A, Yanagida T (1994) Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:12962–12966. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.26.12962
Korn E, Carlier M, Pantaloni D (1987) Actin polymerization and ATP hydrolysis. Science (80-) 238:638–644. doi:10.1126/science.3672117
Kwon HJ, Kakugo A, Shikinaka K et al (2005) Morphology of actin assemblies in response to polycation and salts. Biomacromolecules 6:3005–3009. doi:10.1021/bm050320g
Lieleg O, Claessens MMAE, Bausch AR (2010) Structure and dynamics of cross-linked actin networks. Soft Matter 6:218–225. doi:10.1039/b912163n
Lieleg O, Schmoller KM, Claessens MMAE, Bausch AR (2009) Cytoskeletal polymer networks: viscoelastic properties are determined by the microscopic interaction potential of cross-links. Biophys J 96:4725–4732. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.038
MacKintosh F, Käs J, Janmey P (1995) Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys Rev Lett 75:4425–4428. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4425
Méjean C, Hué HK, Pons F et al (1988) Cation binding sites on actin: a structural relationship between antigenic epitopes and cation exchange. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 152:368–375. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(88)80723-X
Moraczewska J, Strzelecka-Gołaszewska H, Moens PD, dos Remedios CG (1996) Structural changes in subdomain 2 of G-actin observed by fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochem J 317(Pt2):605–611
Moraczewska J, Wawro B, Seguro K, Strzelecka-Golaszewska H (1999) Divalent cation-, nucleotide-, and polymerization-dependent changes in the conformation of subdomain 2 of actin. Biophys J 77:373–385. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76896-7
Murakami K, Yasunaga T, Noguchi TQP et al (2010) Structural basis for actin assembly, activation of ATP hydrolysis, and delayed phosphate release. Cell 143:275–287. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.034
Nyitrai M (1999) The flexibility of actin filaments as revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The Influence of divalent cations. J Biol Chem 274:12996–13001. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.19.12996
Oda T, Iwasa M, Aihara T et al (2009) The nature of the globular- to fibrous-actin transition. Nature 457:441–445. doi:10.1038/nature07685
Onck PR, Koeman T, Van Dillen T, Van Der Giessen E (2005) Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. Phys Rev Lett. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.178102
Oostenbrink C, Soares Ta, van der Vegt NFA, Van Gunsteren WF (2005) Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field. Eur Biophys J 34:273–284. doi:10.1007/s00249-004-0448-6
Orlova A, Egelman EH (1995) Structural dynamics of F-actin: I. Changes in the C terminus. J Mol Biol 245:582–597. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.0048
Ott A, Magnasco M, Simon A, Libchaber A (1993) Measurement of the persistence length of polymerized actin using fluorescence microscopy. Phys Rev E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.48.R1642
Otterbein LR, Graceffa P, Dominguez R (2001) The crystal structure of uncomplexed actin in the ADP state. Science 293:708–711. doi:10.1126/science.1059700
Park J, Kahng B, Kamm RD, Hwang W (2006) Atomistic simulation approach to a continuum description of self-assembled beta-sheet filaments. Biophys J 90:2510–2524. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.074906
Pfaendtner J, Branduardi D, Parrinello M et al (2009) Nucleotide-dependent conformational states of actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12723–12728. doi:10.1073/pnas.0902092106
Pfaendtner J, De La Cruz EM, Voth GA (2010) Actin filament remodeling by actin depolymerization factor/cofilin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7299–7304. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911675107
Saunders MG, Voth GA (2012) Comparison between actin filament models: coarse-graining reveals essential differences. Structure 20:641–653. doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.02.008
Scharf RE, Newman J (1995) Mg- and Ca-actin filaments appear virtually identical in steady-state as determined by dynamic light scattering. Biochim Biophys Acta 1253:129–132. doi:10.1016/0167-48380167-4838(95)00186-5
Schmoller KM, Lieleg O, Bausch AR (2009) Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: cross-linked versus bundled networks. Biophys J 97:83–89. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.040
Schnurr B, Gittes F, MacKintosh FC, Schmidt CF (1997) Determining microscopic viscoelasticity in flexible and semiflexible polymer networks from thermal fluctuations. Macromolecules 30:7781–7792. doi:10.1021/ma970555n
Selden LA, Estes JE, Gershman LC (1983) The tightly bound divalent cation regulates actin polymerization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 116:478–485. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(83)90548-X
Shi W, Inamdar MV, Sastry AM, Lastoskie CM (2007) Divalent cation adsorption on the actin monomer. J Phys Chem C 111:15642–15652. doi:10.1021/jp073763i
Shin JH, Gardel ML, Mahadevan L et al (2004) Relating microstructure to rheology of a bundled and cross-linked F-actin network in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9636–9641. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308733101
Splettstoesser T, Noé F, Oda T, Smith JC (2009) Nucleotide-dependence of G-actin conformation from multiple molecular dynamics simulations and observation of a putatively polymerization-competent superclosed state. Proteins 76:353–364. doi:10.1002/prot.22350
Steinmetz MO, Goldie KN, Aebi U (1997) A correlative analysis of actin filament assembly, structure, and dynamics. J Cell Biol 138:559–574. doi:10.1083/jcb.138.3.559
Strzelecka-Gołaszewska H, Moraczewska J, Khaitlina SY, Mossakowska M (1993) Localization of the tightly bound divalent-cation-dependent and nucleotide-dependent conformation changes in G-actin using limited proteolytic digestion. Eur J Biochem 211:731–742. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17603.x
Strzelecka-Golaszewska H, Wozniak A, Hult T, Lindberg U (1996) Effects of the type of divalent cation, Ca\(^{2+}\) or Mg\(^{2+}\), bound at the high-affinity site and of the ionic composition of the solution on the structure of F-actin. Biochem J 316(Pt3):713–721
Tama F, Gadea FX, Marques O, Sanejouand YH (2000) Building-block approach for determining low-frequency normal modes of macromolecules. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 41:1–7. doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20001001)41:1<1::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-P
Tharmann R, Claessens M, Bausch A (2007) Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. Phys Rev Lett 98:088103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.088103
Tirion MM (1996) Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 77:1905–1908. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1905
Tseng Y, Schafer BW, Almo SC, Wirtz D (2002) Functional synergy of actin filament cross-linking proteins. J Biol Chem 277:25609–25616. doi:10.1074/jbc.M202609200
Unterberger MJ, Schmoller KM, Bausch AR, Holzapfel GA (2013) A new approach to model cross-linked actin networks: multi-scale continuum formulation and computational analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 22:95–114. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.019
Wagner B, Tharmann R, Haase I et al (2006) Cytoskeletal polymer networks: the molecular structure of cross-linkers determines macroscopic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13974–13978. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510190103
Wang N, Butler J, Ingber D (1993) Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260:1124–1127. doi:10.1126/science.7684161
Wriggers W, Schulten K (1997) Stability and dynamics of G-actin: back-door water diffusion and behavior of a subdomain 3/4 loop. Biophys J 73:624–639. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78098-6
Xu J, Tseng Y, Wirtz D (2000) Strain hardening of actin filament networks: regulation by the dynamic cross-linking protein alpha-actinin. J Biol Chem 275:35886–35892. doi:10.1074/jbc.M002377200
Yang L-W, Chng C-P (2008) Coarse-grained models reveal functional dynamics-I. Elastic network models-theories, comparisons and perspectives. Bioinform Biol Insights 2:25–45
Zimmerle CT, Patane K, Frieden C (1987) Divalent cation binding to the high- and low-affinity sites on G-actin. Biochemistry 26:6545–6552. doi:10.1021/bi00394a039
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge a fellowship from the MITOR program to TCB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bidone, T.C., Kim, T., Deriu, M.A. et al. Multiscale impact of nucleotides and cations on the conformational equilibrium, elasticity and rheology of actin filaments and crosslinked networks. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14, 1143–1155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0660-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0660-6