Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of viscoelastic mud-induced energy attenuation in the third-generation wave model, SWAN

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction of waves with fluid mud can dissipate the wave energy significantly over few wavelengths. In this study, the third-generation wave model, SWAN, was advanced to include attenuation of wave energy due to interaction with a viscoelastic fluid mud layer. The performances of implemented viscoelastic models were verified against an analytical solution and viscous formulations for simple one-dimensional propagation cases. Stationary and non-stationary test cases in the Surinam coast and the Atchafalaya Shelf showed that the inclusion of the mud-wave interaction term in the third-generation wave model enhances the model performance in real applications. A high value of mud viscosity (of the order of 0.1 m2/s) was required in both field cases to remedy model overestimation at high frequency ranges of the wave spectrum. The use of frequency-dependent mud viscosity value improved the performance of model, especially in the frequency range of 0.2–0.35 Hz in the wave spectrum. In addition, the mud-wave interaction might affect the high frequency part of the spectrum, and this part of the wave spectrum is also affected by energy transfer from wind to waves, even for the fetch lengths of the order of 10 km. It is shown that exclusion of the wind input term in such cases might result in different values for parameters of mud layer when inverse modeling procedure was employed. Unlike viscous models for wave-mud interaction, the inverse modeling results to a set of mud parameters with the same performance when the viscoelastic model is used. It provides an opportunity to select realistic mud parameters which are in more agreement with in situ measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison MA, Kineke GC, Gordon ES, Goni MA (2000) Development and reworking of a seasonal flood deposit on the inner continental shelf off the Atchafalaya River. Cont Shelf Res 20:2267–2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battjes, J., Janssen, J., 1978. Energy loss and set-up due to breaking of random waves. Coast Eng Proc 1

  • Becq-Girard F, Forget P, Benoit M (1999) Non-linear propagation of unidirectional wave fields over varying topography. Coast Eng 38:91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou HT, Foda MA, Hunt JR (1993) Rheological response of cohesive sediments to oscillatory forcing. Nearshore and estuarine cohesive sediment. Transport:126–147

  • Dalrymple RA, Liu PL (1978) Waves over soft muds: a two-layer fluid model. J Phys Oceanogr 8:1121–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit PJ (1996) Liquefaction of cohesive sediments caused by waves. Oceanogr Lit Rev 3:252

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldeberky Y, Battjes J 1995 Parameterization of triad interactions in wave energy models

  • Elgar S, Raubenheimer B, 2008 Wave dissipation by muddy seafloors. Geophys Res Lett 35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foda MA, Hunt JR, Chou HT (1993) A nonlinear model for the fluidization of marine mud by waves. J Geophys Res Oceans 98:7039–7047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gade HG (1957) Effects of a nonrigid, impermeable bottom on plane surface waves in shallow water. Texas A&M University, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • GEBCO 2014 General bathymetric chart of the oceans, http://www.gebco.net/data_and_products/gridded_bathymetry_data/

  • Haghshenas SA, Soltanpour M (2011) An analysis of wave dissipation at the Hendijan mud coast, the Persian Gulf. Ocean Dyn 61:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson JL, Tracy BA, Tolman HL, Scott RD (2009) Pacific hindcast performance of three numerical wave models. J Atmos Ocean Technol 26:1614–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann K, Barnett T, Bouws E, Carlson H, Cartwright D, Enke K, Ewing J, Gienapp H, Hasselmann D, Kruseman P 1973. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Deutches Hydrographisches Institut

  • Hasselmann S, Hasselmann K, Allender J, Barnett T (1985) Computations and parameterizations of the nonlinear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. Part II: parameterizations of the nonlinear energy transfer for application in wave models. J Phys Oceanogr 15:1378–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu W, Hwung H, Hsu T, Torres-Freyermuth A, Yang R (2013) An experimental and numerical investigation on wave-mud interactions. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:1126–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaihatu JM, Sheremet A, Holland KT (2007) A model for the propagation of nonlinear surface waves over viscous muds. Coast Eng 54:752–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranenburg W (2008) Modelling wave damping by fluid mud. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranenburg W, Winterwerp J, de Boer G, Cornelisse J, Zijlema M (2011) SWAN-Mud: engineering model for mud-induced wave damping. J Hydraul Eng 137:959–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Mehta A (2000) Fluid mud in the wave-dominated environment revisited. Proc Mar Sci 3:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu PL-F, Chan I-C (2007) A note on the effects of a thin visco-elastic mud layer on small amplitude water-wave propagation. Coast Eng 54:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maa JP-Y, Mehta AJ (1990) Soft mud response to water waves. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 116:634–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson H (1980) The attenuation of water waves over a non-rigid bed. J Fluid Mech 97:721–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta AJ, Lee S-C, Li Y (1994) Fluid mud and water waves: a brief review of interactive processes and simple modeling approaches. Florida Univ Gainesville Dept of Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller DE (1956) A method for solving algebraic equations using an automatic computer. Math Table Aids Comput 10:208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill CF, Allison MA (2005) Subaqueous deltaic formation on the Atchafalaya Shelf, Louisiana. Mar Geol 214:411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng C-O (2000) Water waves over a muddy bed: a two-layer Stokes’ boundary layer model. Coast Eng 40:221–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrıguez G, Soares CG (1999) A criterion for the automatic identification of multimodal sea wave spectra. Appl Ocean Res 21:329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers WE, Holland KT (2009) A study of dissipation of wind-waves by mud at Cassino Beach, Brazil: prediction and inversion. Cont Shelf Res 29:676–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safak I, Sahin C, Kaihatu J, Sheremet A (2013) Modeling wave-mud interaction on the central Chenier-plain coast, western Louisiana Shelf, USA. Ocean Model 70:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, C., Safak, I., Sheremet, A., Mehta, A.J., 2012. Observations on cohesive bed reworking by waves: Atchafalaya Shelf, Louisiana. J Geophys Res Oceans 117, n/a-n/a

  • Salmon, J.E., Holthuijsen, L., Smit, P., Van Vledder, G., Zijlema, M., 2014. Alternative source terms for SWAN in the coastal region. Coast Eng Proc 1, 22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheremet A, Stone G (2003) Observations of nearshore wave dissipation over muddy sea beds. J Geophys Res Oceans 108

  • Sheremet A, Mehta A, Liu B, Stone G (2005) Wave–sediment interaction on a muddy inner shelf during Hurricane Claudette. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 63:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheremet, A., Jaramillo, S., Su, S.F., Allison, M., Holland, K., 2011a. Wave-mud interaction over the muddy Atchafalaya subaqueous clinoform, Louisiana, United States: wave processes. J Geophys Res Oceans 116

  • Sheremet A, Jaramillo S, Su SF, Allison MA, Holland KT (2011b) Wave-mud interaction over the muddy Atchafalaya subaqueous clinoform, Louisiana, United States: wave processes. J Geophys Res Oceans 116:C06005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibayama T, An NN (1993) A visco-elastic-plastic model for wave-mud interaction. Coast Eng Jpn 36:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siadatmousavi SM, Allahdadi MN, Chen Q, Jose F, Roberts H (2012) Simulation of wave damping during a cold front over the muddy Atchafalaya shelf. Cont Shelf Res 47:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanpour M, Haghshenas SA, Mehta AJ (2009) Fluidized mud-wave interaction under regular and irregular waves. J Coast Res:616–626

  • Soltanpour M, Haghshenas SA, Shibayama T (2015) A two-dimensional experimental-numerical approach to investigate wave transformation over muddy beds. Ocean Dyn 65:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone GW, Zhang X, Gibson W, Frederichs R 2001. A new wave-current online information system for oil spill contingency planning (WAVCIS), Proceedings of the 24th Arctic and marine oil spill program technical seminar (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Environment Canada), pp. 401–425

  • Tahvildari N, Kaihatu JM (2011) Optimized determination of viscous mud properties using a nonlinear wave–mud interaction model. J Atmos Ocean Technol 28:1486–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Freyermuth A, Hsu TJ (2010) On the dynamics of wave-mud interaction: a numerical study. J Geophys Res Oceans 115

  • Torres-Freyermuth A, Hsu TJ (2014) On the mechanisms of low-frequency wave attenuation by muddy seabeds. Geophys Res Lett 41:2870–2875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J.T., Kemp, G.P., 1981. Atchafalaya mud stream and recent mudflat progradation: Louisiana Chenier plain

  • Wells, J.T., Kemp, G.P., 1986. Interaction of surface waves and cohesive sediments: field observations and geologic significance, estuarine cohesive sediment dynamics. Springer, pp. 43–65

  • Winterwerp JC, de Boer GJ, Greeuw G, van Maren DS (2012) Mud-induced wave damping and wave-induced liquefaction. Coast Eng 64:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zijlema M, Van Vledder GP, Holthuijsen L (2012) Bottom friction and wind drag for wave models. Coast Eng 65:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mostafa Siadatmousavi.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Bruno Castelle

Appendices

Appendix A The procedure for solving dispersion equation of Liu and Chan (2007)

As mentioned in “Section 2.1”, the dispersion equation of Liu and Chan (2007) method is an implicit equation and needs iteration for finding out wavenumber k.

The wavenumber obtained from dispersion equation of Gade (1957), k 0 which is an explicit equation, was used as an initial value for the iteration procedure.

$$ {k}_0={\omega}^{\ast }{\left\{\frac{\left(1+\varGamma \frac{H_{m0}}{H_{w0}}\right)-\sqrt{{\left(1+\varGamma \frac{H_{m0}}{H_{w0}}\right)}^2-4\upgamma \Gamma \frac{H_{m0}}{H_{w0}}}}{2\upgamma \mathrm{g}\Gamma {H}_{m0}}\right\}}^{\frac{1}{2}} $$
(15)

in which \( \varGamma =1-\frac{\tanh \Big({m}^{\ast }{H}_{\mathrm{m}0\Big)}}{m^{\ast }{H}_{\mathrm{m}0}} \),\( m=\left(1-i\right)\sqrt{\frac{\omega }{2{\nu}_{\mathrm{m}}}} \), \( \gamma =\frac{\rho_{\mathrm{m}}-{\rho}_{\mathrm{w}}}{\rho_{\mathrm{m}}} \), ρ mρ w are mud and water densities, H w0 and H m0 are water depth and mud thickness, respectively. Moreover, ν m is mud kinematic viscosity. The Newton-Raphson method was used as iteration process, since it can be used for complex numbers effectively. It reads as follows:

$$ {k}_{n+1}={k}_n-\frac{f\left({k}_n\right)}{f^{\prime}\left({k}_n\right)} $$
(16)

in which k n is the wave number in the previous step, k n + 1 is the updated wavenumber in new step, f is the implicit function of dispersion equation, and f is the derivative of function f with respect to k.

Appendix B The procedure for solving dispersion equation of Macpherson (1980)

The dispersion equation of Macpherson (1980) method is also an implicit equation and it needs iteration procedure to determine the complex wavenumber. The initial value of wavenumber can be obtained from the dispersion equation of linear wave theory:

$$ {\omega}^2=g{k}_0\ \tanh \left({k}_0\ {H}_{w0}\right) $$
(17)

in which g is the gravity acceleration, and other parameters in Eq. (17) is defined in the same as previous Appendix 1. The numerical root-finding algorithm of Muller method (Muller 1956) can be used effectively to solve dispersion equation of Macpherson (1980). However, it is a three-step method and needs three previous steps to create the new one. The second and third steps are produced using the Newton-Raphson method explained in Appendix 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beyramzade, M., Siadatmousavi, S.M. Implementation of viscoelastic mud-induced energy attenuation in the third-generation wave model, SWAN. Ocean Dynamics 68, 47–63 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1118-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1118-4

Keywords

Navigation