Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of acclimated sludge used as seeding material in the start-up of anaerobic digestion of glycerol

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods for improving the anaerobic digestion of glycerol (propane-1,2,3-triol) were investigated, particularly the effects of using acclimated sludge as seeding material during start-up. Glycerol was supplied to the anaerobic digester at an organic loading rate of 2.5 g-COD L−1 day−1. Four experimental runs were carried out with varying mixing ratios of acclimated sludge to unacclimated sludge (0, 10, 20, and 33%). Calculations were performed by employing a numerical model, whose parameters were determined by experimental measurements. Methane production rate (MPR) for all runs attained similar stable values around 21.4 mmol L−1 day−1, though more time was required for attaining stable state of methane production with lower mixing ratios of acclimated sludge. The initial MPR calculated was proportional to the mixing ratio of acclimated sludge. Furthermore, molecular biological methods showed that the types of microorganisms observed in all runs were similar. These results indicate that the seeding with different mixing ratios of acclimated sludge did not affect the microbial consortia in the anaerobic digestion approaching stable state, but did affect the cell density of the useful microorganisms at the start of methane fermentation. Consequently, it was confirmed that at a higher mixing ratio of acclimated sludge, the start of methane production became more vigorous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajanovic A (2011) Biofuels versus food production: does biofuels production increase food prices? Energy 36:2070–2076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston M, Holloway T (2007) A global comparison of national biodiesel production potentials. Environ Sci Technol 41:7967–7973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balat M, Balat H (2010) Progress in biodiesel processing. Appl Energy 87:1815–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daud NM, Abdullah SR, Hasan HA, Yaakob Z (2015) Production of biodiesel and its wastewater treatment technologies: a review. Process Saf Environ Prot 94:487–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2007) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viana MB, Freitas V, Leitão RC, Pinto GS, Santaella ST (2012) Anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol: a review. Environ Technol Rev 1:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinh NT, Hatta K, Kwon SH, Rollon AP, Nakasaki K (2014) Changes in the microbial community during the acclimation stages of the methane fermentation for the treatment of glycerol. Biomass Bioenergy 68:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y, Tsukahara K, Sawayama S (2008) Biodegradation and methane production from glycerol-containing synthetic wastes with fixed-bed bioreactor under mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic conditions. Process Biochem 43:362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vásquez J, Nakasaki K (2016) Effects of shock loading versus stepwise acclimation on microbial consortia during the anaerobic digestion of glycerol. Biomass Bioenergy 86:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suryawanshi PC, Chaudhari B, Bhardwaj S, Yeole TY (2013) Operating procedures for efficient anaerobic digester operation. Res J Anim Vet Fish Sci 1:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R (2008) Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:755–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain S, Wolf IT, Wah TY (2014) Anaerobic digestion of food waste using artificially cultured and natural anaerobes under Mesophilic conditions. J Mater Environ Sci 5:1709–1714

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sutherland AD, Varela JC (2014) Comparison of various microbial inocula for the efficient anaerobic digestion of Laminaria hyperborea. BMC Biotechnol 14:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vrieze JD, Raport L, Willems B, Verbrugge S, Volcke E, Meers E et al (2015) Inoculum selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial substrates. Microb Biotechnol 8:776–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janeczko A, Oleszkiewicz JA (1993) Response of acclimated and un-acclimated activated sludge to 2-nitrophenol. Environ Technol 14:351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nuchdang S, Khemkhao M, Techkarnjanaruk S, Phalakornkule C (2015) Comparative biochemical methane potential of paragrass using an unacclimated and an acclimated microbial consortium. Bioresour Technol 183:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakasaki K, Kwon SH, Takemoto Y (2015) An interesting correlation between methane production rates and archaea cell density during anaerobic digestion with increasing organic loading. Biomass Bioenergy 78:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon SH, Nakasaki K (2014) Relationship between changes in microbial community and the deterioration of methane fermentation which treats synthetic peptone wastewater. J Ind Eng Chem 21:443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerardi M (2003) The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Golueke CG (1977) Biological reclamation of solid waste. Rodale press, Emmaus

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nakasaki K, Araya S, Mimoto H (2013) Inoculation of Pichia kudriavzevii RB1 degrades the organic acids present in raw compost material and accelerates composting. Bioresour Technol 144:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakasaki K, Mimoto H, Tran QNM, Oinuma A (2015) Composting of food waste subjected to hydrothermal pretreatment and inoculated with Paecilomyces sp. FA13. Bioresour Technol 180:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakasaki K, Matsuura H, Tanaka H, Sakai T (2006) Synergy of two thermophiles enables decomposition of poly-ε-caprolactone under composting conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful with Dr. Michiharu Abe and the members of Nakasaki laboratory for their constant support and comments. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Vásquez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vásquez, J., Nakasaki, K. Effects of acclimated sludge used as seeding material in the start-up of anaerobic digestion of glycerol. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20, 185–192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0560-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0560-6

Keywords

Navigation