Skip to main content
Log in

Medium-scale gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch for power generation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the performance of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) gasification using a medium-scale downdraft gasifier for power generation. The EFB gasification process was carried out at a feed rate of 126 kg/h within operating temperatures of 850–950 °C. The gasification performance was monitored based on the syngas composition, syngas calorific value (CV) and the gasification cold gas efficiency (CGE). The results show that the EFB gasification performance increases with the increasing of the operating temperature, especially in terms of the syngas CV and the gasification CGE. Operating temperature of 850–950 °C is found to be the ideal temperature range for the EFB gasification process in this medium-scale gasifier to obtain a favourable syngas CV and gasification CGE for engine application. The EFB gasification also produces a relatively low-tar syngas yield and is expected to generate 106 kWe of electricity at a temperature and feed rate of 900 °C and 126 kg/h, respectively. Based on the analysis, the EFB gasification using a medium-scale downdraft gasifier is a very promising process for power generation due to its favourable gasification performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ariffin MA, Wan Mahmood WMF, Mohamed R, Mohd Nor MT (2014) Performance of oil palm frond gasification using medium-scale downdraft gasification for electricity generation. IET Renew Power Gener 9:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ong HC, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH (2011) A review on energy scenario and sustainable energy in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira EG, da Silva JN, de Oliveira JL, Machado CS (2012) Sustainable energy: a review of gasification technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4753–4762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panwar NL, Kaushik SC, Kothari S (2011) Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1513–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emami-Taba L, Irfan MF, Wan Daud WMA, Chakrabarti MH (2013) Fuel blending effects on the co-gasification of coal and biomass—a review. Biomass Bioenerg 57:249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biomass Energy Centre (2015) “What is Biomass.” http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/portal/page?_pageid=76,15049&_dad=portal. Accessed 1 Apr 2015

  7. Shafie SM, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Ahmad-yazid A (2012) A review on electricity generation based on biomass residue in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5879–5889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pei W, Ng Q, Loong H, Yuen F, Kamal M, Heng J (2012) Waste-to-wealth: green potential from palm biomass in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 34:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Umar MS, Jennings P, Urmee T (2013) Strengthening the palm oil biomass renewable energy industry in Malaysia. Renew Energy 60:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malaysia Palm Oil Board (MPOB) (2011) “Economic and statistics (economic and industry development division).” http://www.mpob.gov.my/. Accessed 18 May 2014

  11. Sreejith CC, Muraleedharan C, Arun P (2013) Thermo-chemical analysis of biomass gasification by Gibbs Free Energy minimization model-part: II (optimization of biomass feed and steam to biomass ratio). Int J Green Energy 10:610–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dogru M (2013) Experimental results of olive pits gasification in a fixed bed downdraft gasifier system. Int J Green Energy 10:348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gezer I, Doğru M, Akay G (2009) Gasification of apricot pit shells in a downdraft gasifier. Int J Green Energy 6:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guangul FM, Sulaiman SA, Ramli A (2012) Gasifier selection, design and gasification of oil palm fronds with preheated and unheated gasifying air. Bioresour Technol 126:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhe A, Iortyer HA, Kucha EI (2013) Experimental investigation of a “throatless” downdraft gasifier with palm kernel shell. J Renew Sustain Energy 5:033133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ismail K, Yarmo MA, Taufiq-Yap YH, Ahmad A (2012) The effect of particle size of CaO and MgO as catalysts for gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch to produce hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:3639–3644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dasappa S, Subbukrishna DN, Suresh KC, Paul PJ, Prabhu GS (2011) Operational experience on a grid connected 100 kWe biomass gasification power plant in Karnataka, India. Energy Sustain Dev 15:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hagos FY, Aziz RA, Sulaiman SA (2014) Trends of syngas as a fuel in internal combustion engines. Adv Mech Eng 2014:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. Asadullah M (2014) Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martínez JD, Mahkamov K, Andrade RV, Lora EES (2012) Syngas production in downdraft biomass gasifiers and its application using internal combustion engines. Renew Energy 38(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bocci E, Sisinni M, Moneti M, Vecchione L, Di Carlo A, Villarini M (2014) State of art of small scale biomass gasification power systems: a review of the different typologies. Energy Procedia 45:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez JF, Melgar A, Benjumea PN (2012) Effect of operating and design parameters on the gasification/combustion process of waste biomass in fixed bed downdraft reactors: an experimental study. Fuel 96:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu Q, Brage C, Chen G, Sjöström K (1997) Temperature impact on the formation of tar from biomass pyrolysis in a free-fall reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 40–41:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tursun Y, Xu S, Wang G, Wang C, Xiao Y (2015) Tar formation during co-gasification of biomass and coal under different gasification condition. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 111:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Emami Taba L, Irfan MF, Wan Daud WAM, Chakrabarti MH (2012) The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5584–5596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun S, Zhao Y, Ling F, Su F (2009) Experimental research on air staged cyclone gasification of rice husk. Fuel Process Technol 90:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haryanto A, Fernando SD, Pordesimo LO, Adhikari S (2009) Upgrading of syngas derived from biomass gasification: a thermodynamic analysis. Biomass Bioenerg 33:882–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moni MNZ, Sulaiman SA (2013) Downdraft gasification of oil palm frond: effect of temperature and operation time. Asian J Sci Res 6(2):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon SJ, Son Y-I, Kim Y-K, Lee J-G (2012) Gasification and power generation characteristics of rice husk and rice husk pellet using a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier. Renew Energy 42:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Phuphuakrat T, Namioka T, Yoshikawa K (2010) Tar removal from biomass pyrolysis gas in two-step function of decomposition and adsorption. Appl Energy 87:2203–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Qin Y, Feng J, Li W (2010) Formation of tar and its characterization during air—steam gasification of sawdust in a fluidized bed reactor. Fuel 89:1344–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen H, Namioka T, Yoshikawa K (2011) Characteristics of tar, NOx precursors and their absorption performance with different scrubbing solvents during the pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Appl Energy 88:5032–5041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee U, Balu E, Chung JN (2013) An experimental evaluation of an integrated biomass gasification and power generation system for distributed power applications. Appl Energy 101:699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sridhar G, Dasappa S, Sridhar HV, Paul PJ, Rajan NKS (2007) Green electricity–a case study of a grid linked independent power producer. In: Paper presented at the 15th European biomass conference & exhibition, Berlin, 7–11 May 2007

  35. Lahijani P, Zainal ZA (2011) Gasification of palm empty fruit bunch in a bubbling fluidized bed: a performance and agglomeration study. Bioresour Technol 102:2068–2076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shen Y, Wang J, Ge X, Chen M (2016) By-products recycling for syngas cleanup in biomass pyrolysis—an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1246–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ruiz JA, Juarez MC, Morales MP, Munoz P, Mendivil MA (2013) Biomass gasification for electricity generation: review of current technology barriers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:174–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for supporting this research through the Arus Perdana Research Grant, AP-2012-010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Mohd Faizal Wan Mahmood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ariffin, M.A., Wan Mahmood, W.M.F., Harun, Z. et al. Medium-scale gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch for power generation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19, 1244–1252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0518-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0518-8

Keywords

Navigation