Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The assessment of renal cortex and parenchymal volume using automated CT volumetry for predicting renal function after donor nephrectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Contrast-enhanced CT is necessary before donor nephrectomy and is usually combined with a Tc-99m-mercapto-acetyltriglycine (MAG3) scan to check split renal function (SRF). However, all transplant programs do not use MAG3 because of its high cost and exposure to radiation. We examined whether CT volumetry of the kidney can be a new tool for evaluating SRF.

Methods

Sixty-three patients underwent live donor nephrectomy. Patients without a 1.0 mm slice CT or follow-up for <12 months were excluded leaving 34 patients’ data being analyzed. SRF was measured by MAG3. Split renal volume (SRV) was calculated automatically using volume analyzer software. The correlation between SRF and SRV was examined. The association between the donor’s postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and predicted eGFR calculated by MAG3 or CT volumetry was analyzed at 1, 3, and 12 months post nephrectomy.

Results

Strong correlations were observed preoperatively in a Bland–Altman plot between SRF measured by MAG3 and either CT cortex or parenchymal volumetry. In addition, eGFR after donation correlated with SRF measured by MAG3 or CT volumetry. The correlation coefficients (R) for eGFR Mag3 split were 0.755, 0.615, and 0.763 at 1, 3 and 12 months, respectively. The corresponding R values for cortex volume split were 0.679, 0.638, and 0.747. Those for parenchymal volume split were 0.806, 0.592, and 0.764.

Conclusion

Measuring kidney by CT volumetry is a cost-effective alternative to MAG3 for evaluating SRF and predicting postoperative donor renal function. Both cortex and parenchymal volumetry were similarly effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2013 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2013.

  2. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:459–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbas AS, Li Y, Zair M, Van JA, Famure O, Dib MJ, et al. CT volumetry is superior to nuclear renography for prediction of residual kidney function in living donors. Clin Transplant. 2016;30:1028–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sejima T, Yamaguchi N, Iwaoto H, Masago T, Morizane S, Ono K, et al. The utility of the remnant kidney volume/body surface area ratio and tumor diameter as predictors of postoperative degree of renal functional decline in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2015;86:307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanusi AA, Arogundade FA, Famurewa OC, Akintomide AO, Soyinka FO, Ojo OE, et al. Relationship of ultrasonographically determined kidney volume with measured GFR, calculated creatinine clearance and other parameters in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:1690–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamashita SR, von Atzingen AC, Lared W, Bezerra AS, Ammirati AL, Canziani ME, et al. Value of renal cortical thickness as a predictor of renal function impairment in chronic renal disease patients. Radiol Bras. 2015;48:12–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yanishi M, Kinoshita H, Yoshida T, Takayasu K, Yoshida K, Kawa G, et al. Comparison of renal scintigraphy and computed tomographic renal volumetry for determining split renal function and estimating post-transplant renal function. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:2700–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wan RK, Spalding E, Winch D, Brown K, Geddes CC. Reduced kidney function in living kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2007;71:1077.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patankar K, Low RS, Blakeway D, Ferrari P. Comparison of computer tomographic volumetry versus nuclear split renal function to determine residual renal function after living kidney donation. Acta Radiol. 2014;55:753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Diasty TA, Shokeir AA, El-Ghar ME, Gad HM, Refaie AF, El-Din AB. Contrast enhanced spiral computerized tomography in live kidney donors: a single session for anatomical and functional assessment. J Urol. 2004;171:31–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wahba R, Franke M, Hellmich M, Kleinert R, Cingoz T, Schmidt MC, et al. Computed tomography volumetry in preoperative living kidney donor assessment for prediction of split renal function. Transplantation. 2016;100:1270–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luyckx VA, Brenner BM. The clinical importance of nephron mass. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:898–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Breau RH, Clark E, Bruner B, Cervini P, Atwell T, Knoll G, et al. A simple method to estimate renal volume from computed tomography. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7:189–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zakhari N, Blew B, Shabana W. Simplified method to measure renal volume: the best correction factor for the ellipsoid formula volume calculation in pretransplant computed tomographic live donor. Urology. 2014;83:e15–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimoyama H, Isotani S, China T, Nagata M, Yokota I, Kitamura K, et al. Automated renal cortical volume measurement for assessment of renal function in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017. doi:10.1007/s101570171404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma N, O’Hara J, Novick AC, Lieber M, Remer EM, Herts BR. Correlation between loss of renal function volume after partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol. 2008;179:1284–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen KW, Wu MW, Chen Z, Tai BC, Goh YS, Lata R, et al. Compensatory hypertrophy after living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc. 2016;48:716–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taner T, Iqbal CW, Textor SC, Stegall MD, Ishitani MB. Compensatory hypertrophy of the remaining kidney in medically complex living kidney donors over the long term. Transplantation. 2015;99:555–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Sadahira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

This clinical study was approved by the Okayama University Institutional Review Board prior to study initiation (Registration No. 951).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitsui, Y., Sadahira, T., Araki, M. et al. The assessment of renal cortex and parenchymal volume using automated CT volumetry for predicting renal function after donor nephrectomy. Clin Exp Nephrol 22, 453–458 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-017-1454-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-017-1454-1

Keywords

Navigation