Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses

  • Cochrane Digest
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abridged Abstract [1]

Background

This is the first systematic review specifically investigating ileocolic anastomosis.

Objectives

To compare outcomes of ileocolic anastomoses performed using stapling and handsewn techniques. The hypothesis tested was that the stapling technique is associated with fewer complications.

Search strategy

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group specialised register SR-COLOCA, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing the use of a linear cutter stapler with any type of suturing technique for ileocolic anastomoses in adults from 1970 to 2005. Selection criteria were randomised controlled trials comparing the use of linear cutter stapler (isoperistaltic side to side or functional end to end) with any type of suturing technique in adults. Regarding data collection and analysis, eligible studies were selected and their methodological quality assessed. Sub-group analyses for cancer and inflammatory bowel disease as indication for ileocolic anastomoses were performed.

Results

Six trials (including one unpublished) with 955 ileocolic participants were included. The three largest trials had adequate allocation concealment. Stapled anastomosis was associated with significantly fewer anastomotic leaks compared with the handsewn technique (S = 5/357, HS = 36/598, OR 0.34 [0.14, 0.82] p = 0.02). For the sub-group of 825 cancer patients in four studies, stapled anastomosis led to significantly fewer anastomotic leaks (S = 4/300, HS = 35/525, OR 0.28 [0.10, 0.75] p = 0.01). There were very less Crohn’s disease patients to perform a sub-group analysis. All other outcomes showed no significant difference.

Conclusions

Stapled functional end-to-end ileocolic anastomosis is associated with fewer leaks than handsewn anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choy PYG, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie AEH (2007) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9011-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. He X, Chen Z, Huang J et al (2014) Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be better than handsewn end-to-end anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 59(7):1544–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3039-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng JS, Li JY, Yang Z, Chen XY, Mo JJ, Li SH (2018) Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be benefit in intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease. Medicine (United States). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010315

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bemelman WA, Warusavitarne J, Sampietro GM et al (2018) ECCO-ESCP consensus on surgery for Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown SR, Fearnhead NS, Faiz OD et al (2018) The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Color Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kono T, Ashida T, Ebisawa Y et al (2011) A new antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn anastomosis: surgical prevention of anastomotic recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 54(5):586–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e318208b90f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anthony A, Dhillon AP, Pounder RE, Wakefield AJ (1997) Ulceration of the ileum in Crohn’s disease: correlation with vascular anatomy. J Clin Pathol 50(12):1013–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kono T, Fichera A, Maeda K et al (2016) Kono-S anastomosis for surgical prophylaxis of anastomotic recurrence in Crohn’s disease: an International Multicenter Study. J Gastrointest Surg 20(4):783–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-3061-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimada N, Ohge H, Kono T et al (2019) Surgical recurrence at anastomotic site after bowel resection in Crohn’s disease: comparison of Kono-S and End-to-end anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4012-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coffey JC, Kiernan MG, Sahebally SM et al (2018) Inclusion of the mesentery in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced surgical recurrence. J Crohn’s Colitis. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luglio G, Rispo A, Castiglione F et al (2016) Kono-type anastomosis in a patient with severe multi-recurrent Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2567-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Imperatore N, Rispo A, Luglio G, Bucci L, Castiglione F (2018) Letter: which risk factors for post-operative recurrence in Crohn’s disease can be modified? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Michelassi F (2014) Crohn’s recurrence after intestinal resection and anastomosis. Dig Dis Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3096-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaetano Luglio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Formal consent is not required for the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luglio, G., Corcione, F. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Tech Coloproctol 23, 1093–1095 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02105-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02105-8

Navigation