Abstract
The increased use of legumes is viewed as a promising option to mitigate climate change, as they are a source of proteins and provide nitrogen to the soil. In this paper, we evaluate a strategy for the increased use of legumes in Europe until 2050 by integrating a large array of food and natural system processes into a consistent modeling framework. Three contrasting scenarios are studied: a supply-side scenario entailing a change in the animal feed mix, a demand-side scenario entailing a shift in human diet, and a combination of the shift in human diet with a reforestation in Europe. We find that mitigated emissions are much higher in the two diet shift scenarios (-231 and -259 MtCO2eq, respectively) than in the supply-side scenario (-10 MtCO2eq). Therefore, the main environmental benefit of legumes is to provide proteins as a substitute for animal products rather than enabling a lower consumption of synthetic fertilizer through increased leguminous nitrogen fixation. Diet shift scenarios require a lower use of lands that can then be used to either reduce intensification or reforest. In the former case, the reduction in emissions concerns almost exclusively non-CO2 emissions, mainly through enteric fermentation and manure management, and occurs largely outside Europe. In the latter case, the livestock sector still represents a substantial share of the emission reduction but is outpaced by CO2 emissions through carbon sequestration. An increase in legume production substantially reduces greenhouse gas emissions from the AFOLU sector only when combined with a change in diet, and its combination with reforestation allows the emission reduction to be relocated to Europe through carbon sequestration. Our study concludes that an increase in legume production accompanied by appropriate measures on both the supply and demand side can be effective in reducing emissions. These results can be used to design the European Commission’s “Farm to Fork” strategy for sustainable food and to support climate-friendly farming practices of the post-2020 European common agricultural policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper FAO, Rome
Arima EY, Richards P, Walker R, Caldas MM (2011) Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res Lett 6:024010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010
Bodirsky BL, Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Dietrich JP, Rolinski S et al. (2014) Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nat Commun 5:3858. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4858
Bodirsky BL, Popp A, Weindl I, Dietrich JP, Rolinski S et al (2012) N2O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle - current state and future scenarios. Biogeosciences 9:4169–4197. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4169-2012
Bondeau A, Smith PC, Zaehle S, Schaphoff S, Lucht W et al (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob Chang Biol 13:679–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x
Bouwman AF, Beusen AH, Billen G (2009) Human alteration of the global nitrogen and phosphorus soil balances for the period 1970–2050. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 23
Bowman MS, Soares-Filho BS, Merry FD, Nepstad DC, Rodrigues H et al (2012) Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: A spatial analysis of the rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy 29:558–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.009
Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT (2002) Agroecosystems, Nitrogen-use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Management. Ambio 31:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.132
Cernay C, Ben-Ari T, Pelzer E, Meynard J-M, Makowski D (2015) Estimating variability in grain legume yields across Europe and the Americas. Sci Rep 5:11171. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11171
Cernay C, Pelzer E, Makowski D (2016) A global experimental dataset for assessing grain legume production. Scientific Data 3:160084. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.84
Clark M, Tilman D (2017) Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ Res Lett 12:064016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5
Davidson EA (2012) Representative concentration pathways and mitigation scenarios for nitrous oxide. Environ Res Lett 7:024005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024005
Davis KF, Yu K, Herrero M, Havlik P, Carr JA et al (2015) Historical trade-offs of livestock’s environmental impacts. Environ Res Lett 10:125013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125013
FAO and WHO (2001) Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition. FAO Food and Nutrition Division. WHO, Rome
FAOSTAT (2011) PRODSTAT food and agricultural commodities production. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
FAOSTAT (2015) Faostat online database. http://faostat.fao.org/
Fehlenberg V, Baumann M, Gasparri NI, Piquer-Rodriguez M, Gavier-Pizarro G et al (2017) The role of soybean production as an underlying driver of deforestation in the South American Chaco. Glob Environ Chang 45:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.001
Groenigen JWV, Velthof GL, Oenema O, Groenigen KJV, Kessel CV (2010) Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops. Eur J Soil Sci 61:903–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01217.x
Häusling M (2011) The EU protein deficit: what solution for a long-standing problem? European Parliament
Henders S, Persson UM, Kastner T (2015) Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environ Res Lett 10:125012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012
Hickman BG (2014) Global International Economic Models: Selected Papers from an IIASA Conference. North Holland
International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA) (2009) Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions in Ammonia Production. https://www.fertilizer.org/ItemDetail?iProductCode=8965Pdf&Category=ENV
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. In: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, IGES, Japan. Simon Eggleston and Leandro Buendia and Kyoko Miwa and Todd Ngara and Kiyoto Tanabe
Jeuffroy MH, Baranger E, Carrouée B, de Chezelles E, Gosme M et al (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from crop rotations including wheat, rapeseed and dry pea. Biogeosci Discuss 9:9289–9314. https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-9-9289-2012
Kanter DR, Zhang X, Mauzerall DL, Malyshev S, Shevliakova E (2016) The importance of climate change and nitrogen use efficiency for future nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture. Environ Res Lett 11:094003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094003
Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of Fertilizer Nitrogen in Cereal Production: Retrospects and Prospects. In: Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press, pp 85–156
Lassaletta L, Billen G, Garnier J, Bouwman L, Velazquez E et al (2016) Nitrogen use in the global food system: past trends and future trajectories of agronomic performance, pollution, trade, and dietary demand. Environ Res Lett 11:095007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095007
Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Al GM, Al CLQ et al (2009) Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci 2:831–836. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo689
Liu J, Ma K, Ciais P, Polasky S (2016) Reducing human nitrogen use for food production. Sci Rep 6:30104. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30104
Merry F, Amacher G, Lima E (2008) Land Values in Frontier Settlements of the Brazilian Amazon. World Dev 36:2390–2401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.11.014
Pendrill F, Persson UM, Godar J, Kastner T, Moran D et al (2019) Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob Environ Chang 56:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.002
Pollins BM (1982) Modeling International Trade Flows: A Survey and Comparison of Simulation Approaches. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 3:504–533
Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360:987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
Popp A, Calvin K, Fujimori S, Havlik P, Humpenöder F et al (2017) Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 42:331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002
Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Bodirsky B (2010) Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Glob Environ Chang 20:451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001
Portmann FT, Siebert S, Döll P (2010) MIRCA2000-Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling: monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435
Ranganathan J, Vennard D, Waite R, Lipinski B, Searchinger T et al. (2016) Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future. https://www.wri.org/publication/shifting-diets. Accessed 13 Jul 2020
Reis S, Bekunda M, Howard CM, Karanja N, Winiwarter W et al (2016) Synthesis and review: Tackling the nitrogen management challenge: from global to local scales. Environ Res Lett 11:120205. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120205
Sanz-Cobena A, García-Marco S, Quemada M, Gabriel JL, Almendros P et al (2014a) Do cover crops enhance N2O, CO2 or CH4 emissions from soil in Mediterranean arable systems? Sci Total Environ 466:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.023
Sanz-Cobena A, Lassaletta L, Estellés F, Prado AD, Guardia G et al (2014b) Yield-scaled mitigation of ammonia emission from N fertilization: the Spanish case. Environ Res Lett 9:125005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/125005
Searchinger TD, Wirsenius S, Beringer T, Dumas P (2018) Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change. Nature 564:249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0757-z
Smil V (1999) Crop Residues: Agriculture’s Largest Harvest: Crop residues incorporate more than half of the world’s agricultural phytomass. Bioscience 49:299–308
Solagro (2016) Les légumes secs, quelles initiatives territoriales ? https://solagro.org/images/imagesCK/files/publications/f77_publi-legumes-secs-web-2.pdf
Souty F, Brunelle T, Dumas P, Dorin B, Ciais P et al (2012) The Nexus Land-Use model version 1.0, an approach articulating biophysical potentials and economic dynamics to model competition for land-use. Geosci Model Dev 5:1297–1322. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1297-2012
Souty F, Dorin B, Brunelle T, Dumas P, Ciais P (2013) Modelling economic and biophysical drivers of agricultural land-use change. Calibration and evaluation of the Nexus Land-Use model over 1961–2006. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 6:6975–7046. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-6-6975-2013
Stadler K, Wood R, Bulavskaya T, Södersten C-J, Simas M et al (2018) EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables. J Ind Ecol 22:502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12715
Stehfest E, Bouwman L (2006) N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 74:207–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7
Stehfest E, Bouwman L, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Eickhout B et al (2009) Climate benefits of changing diet. Clim Chang 95:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6
Sutton MA, UNEP (eds) (2013) Our nutrient world: the challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution ; [global overview on nutrient management]. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh
Waisman H, Guivarch C, Grazi F, Hourcade JC (2012) The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight. Clim Chang 114:101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0387-z
Westhoek H, Lesschen JP, Leip A, Rood T, Wagner S et al. (2015) Nitrogen on the table: the influence of food choices on nitrogen emissions, greenhouse gas emissions and land use in Europe. http://edepot.wur.nl/368693. Accessed 24 Apr 2019
Westhoek H, Lesschen JP, Rood T, Wagner S, De Marco A et al (2014) Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Glob Environ Chang 26:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004
Yan X, Akiyama H, Yagi K, Akimoto H (2009) Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 23:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003299
Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K (2013) Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob Environ Chang 23:1178–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006
Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P et al (2015) Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743
Acknowledgments
We thank Auriane Jones and Cyril Bourgeois for their feedbacks on the article. Xin Zhang is supported by National Science Foundation CNS-1739823.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the ABIES Doctoral School (provided by AgroParistech). This article also benefited from the support of the Labex BASC, the Long-term Modeling Chair for Sustainable Development (Ponts Paristech-Mines Paristech) funded by Ademe, Grt-Gaz, Schneider Electric, EDF, and the French Ministry of the Environment and from the French state aid managed by the ANR under the “Investissements d’avenir” programme with the reference ANR-16-CONV-0003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Luis Lassaletta
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 590 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prudhomme, R., Brunelle, T., Dumas, P. et al. Assessing the impact of increased legume production in Europe on global agricultural emissions. Reg Environ Change 20, 91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01651-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01651-4