Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of laser debonding treatment on the optical and mechanical properties of all-ceramic restorations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate how erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser debonding treatment affects the optical and mechanical properties of dental ceramics. In total, 120 rectangular (22*5*1.2 mm) IPS E.max Press specimens were fabricated and divided into 4 groups: the control group, 3 W laser group, 4 W laser group, and 5 W laser group. For each group, 10 specimens were used for the colour test (colour difference (△E) and transparency parameter (TP)), 10 specimens were used for the flexural strength test, and 10 were used for the Vickers hardness test. One random sample from each colour test specimens was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The L*, a*, b*, △E, TP, flexural strength, and Vickers hardness values were measured and calculated. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, the L*, a*, and b* values showed no significant variations (P > 0.05), except for the b* value in the 5 W laser group (P < 0.05). The △E, TP, flexural strength, and Vickers hardness values were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The 5 W laser group exhibited a higher △E value, which exceeded the perceptible threshold and significantly lower TP values than the other groups (P < 0.05). The mean flexural strength and Vickers hardness values after Er:YAG laser debonding revealed no significant changes (P > 0.05). Microcracks were detected during the SEM analysis of the 5 W laser group. Er:YAG laser debonding treatment did not affect the mechanical properties, but changed the optical properties of dental ceramics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. Shenoy A, Shenoy N (2010) Dental ceramics: an update. J Conserv Dent 13(4):195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE (2015) All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 31(6):603–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Gerngross MD, Jetter J, Mintrone M, Lehmann F, Kern M (2019) Properties of hot-pressed lithium silicate glass-ceramics. Dent Mater 35(5):713–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tak O, Sari T, Arslan Malkoç M et al (2015) The effect of transmitted Er:YAG laser energy through a dental ceramic on different types of resin cements. Lasers Surg Med 47(7):602–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghazanfari R, Azimi N, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Alikhasi M (2019) Laser aided ceramic restoration removal: a comprehensive review. Lasers Med Sci 10(2):86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kellesarian SV, Ros Malignaggi V, Aldosary KM, Javed F (2018) Laser-assisted removal of all ceramic fixed dental prostheses: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 30(3):216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Iseri U, Ulkur F, Arun T (2012) Effects of different application durations of scanning laser method on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Lasers Med Sci 27(4):713–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nalbantgil D, Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Arun T (2011) Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding. Lasers Med Sci 26(6):735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Erdem AS, Tozlu M, Arun T (2010) Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138(2):195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morford CK, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Finzen FC, Sharma AB, Rechmann P (2011) Er:YAG laser debonding of porcelain veneers. Lasers Surg Med 43(10):965–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ALBalkhi M, Swed E, Hamadah O (2018) Efficiency of Er:YAG laser in debonding of porcelain laminate veneers by contact and non-contact laser application modes (in vitro study). J EsthetRestor Dent 30(3):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurney ML, Sharples SD, Phillips WB, Lee DJ (2016) Using an Er,Cr: YSGG laser to remove lithium disilicate restorations: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 115(1):90–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iseri U, Oztoprak MO, Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Arun T (2014) Effect of Er:YAG laser on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Eur J Dent 8(1):58–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tocchio RM, Williams PT, Mayer FS, Standing KG (1993) Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 103(2):155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rechmann P, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Finzen FC (2015) Laser all ceramic crown removal and pulpal temperature—a laboratory proof-of-principle study. Lasers Med Sci 30(8):2087–2093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sari T, Tuncel I, Usumez A, Gutknecht N (2014) Transmission of Er: YAG laser through different dental ceramics. Photomed Laser Surg 32(1):37–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alikhasi M, Monzavi A, Ebrahimi H, Pirmoradian M, Shamshiri A, Ghazanfari R (2019) Debonding time and dental pulp temperature with the Er, Cr: YSGG laser for debonding feldespathic and lithium disilicate veneers. Lasers Med Sci 10(3):211–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rechmann P, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Finzen FC (2014) Laser all-ceramic crown removal—a laboratory proof-of-principle study—phase 2 crown debonding time. Lasers Surg Med 46(8):636–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kursoglu P, Gursoy H (2013) Removal of fractured laminate veneers with Er:YAG laser: report of two cases. Photomed Laser Surg 31(1):41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karagoz-Yildirak M, Gozneli R (2019) Evaluation of rebonding strengths of leucite and lithium disilicate veneers debonded with an Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02872-8

  21. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, Karakaya I (2019) The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont 28(2):e496–e503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Önöral Ö, Aktore H, Ozan O (2020) Does the application of surface treatments in different sintering stages affect flexural strength and optical properties of zirconia. J EsthetRestor Dent 32(1):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Turgut S, Bağış B, Korkmaz FM, Tamam E (2014) Do surface treatments affect the optical properties of ceramic veneers? J Prosthet Dent 112(3):618–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ et al (2015) Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr 27(Suppl 1):S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Turgut S, Bagis B, Ayaz EA, Korkmaz FM, Ulusoy KU, Bagis YH (2014) How will surface treatments affect the translucency of porcelain laminate veneers? J Adv Prosthodont 6(1):8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salas M, Lucena C, Herrera LJ, Yebra A, Della Bona A, Pérez MM (2018) Translucency thresholds for dental materials. Dent Mater 34(8):1168–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang H, Xiong F, Zhenhua L (2011) Influence of varied surface texture of dentin porcelain on optical properties of porcelain specimens. J Prosthet Dent 105:242–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Colombo M, Poggio C, Lasagna A, Chiesa M, Scribante A (2019) Vickers micro-hardness of new restorative CAD/CAM dental materials: evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink. Materials (Basel) 16, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081246

  29. Ozdogan A, YesilDuymus Z (2020) Investigating the effect of different surface treatments on Vickers hardness and flexural strength of zirconium and lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthodont 29(2):129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Çağlarİ YN (2016) The effect of sandblasting, Er:YAG laser, and heat treatment on the mechanical properties of different zirconia cores. Photomed Laser Surg 34(1):17–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kursoglu P, Motro PF, Yurdaguven H (2013) Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont 5(2):98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jizhi Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Dong, H., Guo, C. et al. Effects of laser debonding treatment on the optical and mechanical properties of all-ceramic restorations. Lasers Med Sci 36, 1497–1504 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03219-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03219-4

Keywords

Navigation