Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The outlook of building information modeling for sustainable development

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As human needs evolve, information technologies and natural environments require a wider perspective of sustainable development, especially when examining the built environment that impacts the central of social-ecological systems. The objectives of the paper are (a) to review the status and development of building information modeling (BIM) in regards to the sustainable development in the built environment, and (b) to develop a future outlook framework that promotes BIM in sustainable development. Seven areas of sustainability were classified to analyze forty-four BIM guidelines and standards. This review examines the use of BIM in sustainable development, focusing primarily on certain areas of sustainability, such as project development, design, and construction. The developed framework describes the need for collaboration with the multiple disciplines for the future adoption and use of BIM for the sustainable development. It also considers the integration between “BIM and green assessment criteria”; and “BIM and renewable energy” to address the shortcomings of the standards and guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AEC UK (2011) BIM standard for AEC industry in UK. AEC (UK) committee, London

    Google Scholar 

  • AEC UK (2012) AEC (UK) BIM protocol. AEC UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • AFCEECIM (2012) ATTACHMENT F—BIM requirement, United States Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Capital Investment Management USA, San Antonio-Lackland

  • AGC (2009) The contractor’s guide to BIM. Associated General Contractors of America, Virgina

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn KU, Kim YJ, Park CS, Kim I, Lee K (2014) BIM interface for full vs. semi-automated building energy simulation. Energy Build 68:671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AIA (2008) E202-2008 BIM protocol. American Institute of Architects, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • AMCA (2011) BIM-MEPAUS Practice. Mechanical Contractors’ Association, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • AOES (2012) BIM guidelines & standards for architects, engineers, and contractors. Indiana University Architect’s Office and Engineering Services, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • BCA (2012) Singapore BIM guide. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordass B, Leaman A (2014) Building performance evaluation in the UK. In: Preiser WFE, Davis AT, Salama AM, Hardy A (eds) Architecture beyond criticism: expert judgment and performance evaluation. Routledge, London, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossink BA (2015) Demonstration projects for diffusion of clean technological innovation: a review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1409–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BREEAM (2016) BREEAM at a glance. http://www.breeam.com/why-breeam

  • BSI (2007) BS 1192:2007 collaborative production of architectural, engineering and construction information. Code of practice. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2010) BIP 2207 Building information management. A standard framework and guide to BS 1192. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BuildingSMART Finland (2012a) Yleiset tietomallivaatimukset 2012. BuildingSMART Finland, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • BuildingSMART Finland (2012b) Common BIM requirements 2012. BuildingSMART Finland, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hong X (2015) Design of effective subsidy policy to develop green buildings: from the perspective of policy benefit. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(4):1029–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Ma L (2012) A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste quantification and planning. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on computing in civil and building engineering (ICCCBE 2012), Moskow

  • Chong HY, Lam WH (2013) Ocean renewable energy in Malaysia: the potential of the Straits of Malacca. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 23:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong HY, Wang J, Shou W, Wang X, Guo J (2014) Improving quality and performance of facility management using building information modelling. In: Luo Y (ed) Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • CIC (2013) Best practice guide for professional indemnity insurance when using BIM and outline scope of services. Construction Industry Council UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CIMS (2011) BIM development criteria and standards for design & construction projects capital improvements management services San Antonio. CIMS, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  • CoD (2011) BIM guide. College of the Desert, Palm Desert

    Google Scholar 

  • CORENET (2011) CORENET e-submission system construction and real estate NETwork. CORENET, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • CPEC (2011) MIT CAD & BIM guidelines, MIT campus planning, engineering, and construction. CPEC, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • CPO (2012) Attachment G—University of Washington CAD and BIM standards. University of Washington Capital Projects Office, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • CRC (2009) National guidelines and case studies for digital modelling. Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • DDC (2012) BIM guidelines. Department of Design & Construction, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DOA/DSF (2009) BIM guidelines & standards for Architects and Engineers Department of Administration. Division of State Facilities, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2011) BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzurumlu SS, Erzurumlu YO (2013) Development and deployment drivers of clean technology innovations. J High Technol Manag Res 24:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FMS (2012) BIM guidelines. University of Southern California Facilities Management Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs DJ, Emmitt S, Lord W, Ruikar K (2015) BIM and construction contracts: CPC 2013’s approach. In: Proceedings of the ICE—management, procurement & law (in press)

  • Green Building Council Australia (2016) Green Star. https://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/

  • U.S. Green Building (2016) Better buildings are our legacy. http://www.usgbc.org/leed

  • GSA (2007) National 3D-4D BIM program. United States General Services Administration, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • GSA (2012) National 3D-4D BIM program. United States General Services Administration, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • GSFIC (2013) BIM Guide. Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • GTFM (2011) Georgia tech BIM requirements & guidelines for architects. Engineers and Contractors, Georgia Tech Facilities Management, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • HKIBIM (2011) BIM project specification. The Hong Kong Institute of Building Information Modeling, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppmann J, Peters M, Schneider M, Hoffmann VH (2013) The two faces of market support—how deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Res Policy 42:989–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MK, Cheng JC, Sohn H, Chang CC (2015) A framework for dimensional and surface quality assessment of precast concrete elements using BIM and 3D laser scanning. Autom Constr 49:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravanja Z, Varbanov PS, Klemeš JJ (2015) Recent advances in green energy and product productions, environmentally friendly, healthier and safer technologies and processes, CO2 capturing, storage and recycling, and sustainability assessment in decision-making. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(5):1119–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LACCD (2011) BIM Standard. Los Angeles Community College District, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde G, Chmutina K, Bosher LS, Dainty AR (2014) Tensions and complexities in creating a sustainable and resilient built environment: achieving a turquoise agenda in the UK. Global Risk Forum GRF Davos, Davos Platz

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez R, Chong HY, Wang X, Graham J (2015) Technical review: analysis and appraisal of four-dimensional building information modeling usability in construction and engineering projects. J Constr Eng Manag 2:06015005

    Google Scholar 

  • GBI Malaysia (2016) What and why green buildings?. http://new.greenbuildingindex.org/whatandwhy

  • MIKR (2012) Rgd BIM standard, Rijksgebouwendienst (Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations)

  • NAEC (2007) Det Digitale Byggeri (digital construction). Erhvervsstyrelsen (National Agency for Enterprise and Construction), Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • NATSPEC (2011) NATSPEC National BIM Guide, Construction Information Systems Limited ABN 20 117 574 606: Sydney

  • NHBA (2011) BoligBIM (BIM Manual). Boligprodusentene (Norwegian Home Builders Association), Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • NIBS (2012) National BIM Standard. National Institute of Building Science, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • NYSCA (2012) BIM guidelines and standards for architects and engineers. New York City School Construction Authority, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OFCC (2012) BIM protocol. State of Ohio Facilities Construction Commission, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • PANY&NJED (2012) EAD (E/A Design Division) BIM standard manual. The Port Authority of NY & NJ Engineering Department, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri I, Rezgui Y, Beach T, Li H, Arnesano M, Revel GM (2015) A semantic service-oriented platform for energy efficient buildings. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(3):721–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PSU (2012) BIM planning guide for facility owners. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Reza B, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2014) Emergy-based life cycle assessment (Em-LCA) for sustainability appraisal of infrastructure systems: a case study on paved roads. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(2):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers J, Chong HY, Preece C (2015) Adoption of building information modelling technology (BIM) perspectives from Malaysian engineering consulting services firms. Eng Constr Archit Manag 22(4):424–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakmani AS, Lam WH, Hashim R, Chong HY (2013) Site selection for tidal turbine installation in the Strait of Malacca. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:590–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBEnrc (2015) National BIM guidelines and case studies for infrastructure. SBEnrc, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • SDCCD (2012) BIM standards for architects, engineers & contractors. San Diego Community College District, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • SEC (2013) First steps to BIM competence: A Guide for Specialist Contractors, Specialist Engineering Contractors’ Group and BIM Academy at the University of Northumbria, Northumbria

  • Shou W, Wang J, Wang X, Chong HY (2015) A comparative review of building information modelling implementation in building and infrastructure industries. Arch Comput Methods Eng 22(2):291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Gu N, Wang X (2011) A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform. Autom Constr 20(2):134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statsbygg (2012) Statsbygg BIM manual. Statsbygg, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschner N, McDonald A, Foxon TJ, Paavola J (2012) Integrated transitions toward sustainability: the case of water and energy policies in Israel. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79:457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TFC (2010) Professional service provider guidelines and standards. Texas Facilities Commission, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE (2012) Roadmap for life-cycle BIM. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USVA (2010) BIM guide. Veterans Affairs, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk R, Stengel J, Schultmann F (2014) Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings—literature review and future needs. Autom Constr 38:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chong HY (2015) Setting new trends of integrated building information modelling (BIM) for construction industry. Constr Innov 15(1):2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Truijens M, Hou L, Wang Y, Zhou Y (2014) Integrating augmented reality with building information modeling: onsite construction process controlling for liquefied natural gas industry. Autom Constr 40:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wang X, Shou W, Chong HY, Guo J (2016) Building information modeling-based integration of MEP layout designs and constructability. Autom Constr 61:134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong K-D, Fan Q (2013) Building information modelling (BIM) for sustainable building design. Facilities 31(3/4):138–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadollahi M, Ansari R, Abd Majid MZ, Yih CH (2014) A multi-criteria analysis for bridge sustainability assessment: a case study of Penang Second Bridge, Malaysia. Struct Infrastruct Eng 1–17 (ahead-of-print)

  • Yun SH, Jun KH, Son CB, Kim SC (2014) Preliminary study for performance analysis of BIM-based building construction simulation system. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(2):531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heap-Yih Chong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chong, HY., Wang, X. The outlook of building information modeling for sustainable development. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 1877–1887 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1170-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1170-7

Keywords

Navigation