Skip to main content
Log in

Reengineering the paper mill waste management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are thousands of pulp and paper mills worldwide. The utilization of the waste they produce is a problem of particular importance. Many methods have already been put forward for the management of the mixture of lime mud and cellulose fibre residues. The chemical nature of its management presents a challenge because it requires costly catalysts and long retention times or raises criticisms about its environmental impacts. Several techno-economic analyses (including various modifications to anaerobic fermentation; combustion; pyrolysis and composting) have been carried out on an almost commercial scale to holistically assess the wide portfolio of management issues. The data obtained indicate that it cannot be clearly concluded that one particular method is the best for dealing with all management issues. However, the conclusions do provide an insight into how processing technologies can be adapted in specific cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberici A, Querci F (2015) The quality of disclosures on environmental policy: the Profile of financial intermediaries. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. doi:10.1002/csr.1375

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento AM, Kanbur R, Leard B (2015) Designing efficient markets for carbon offsets with distributional constraints. J Environ Econ Manag 70:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch D, Kammann C, Grünhage L, Müller C (2012) Simple biotoxicity tests for evaluation of carbonaceous soil additives: establishment and reproducibility of four test procedures. J Environ Qual 41:1023–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Chen X, Xu J (2015) Impacts of climate change on agriculture: evidence from China. J Environ Econ Manag. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Doda B, Gennaioli C, Gouldson A, Groverand D, Sullivan R (2015) Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. doi:10.1002/csr.1369

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell H, Burtraw D, Morgenstern R, Palmer K (2012) Climate policy design with correlated uncertainties in offset supply and abatement cost. Land Econ 88:589–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilescu D (2008) Energy from biomass in pulp and paper mills. Environ Eng Manag J 7:537–546

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havlínová B, Katuščák S, Petrovičová M, Maková A, Brezová V (2009) A study of mechanical properties of papers exposed to various methods of accelerated ageing. Part I. The effect of heat and humidity on original wood–pulp papers. J Cult Herit 10:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Lange CR, Dougherty M (2009) Laboratory study using paper mill lime mud for agronomic benefit. Process Saf Environ 87:401–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Nelson PF (2010) Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere 78:1167–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain R (2005) Sustainability: metrics, specific indicators and preference index. Clean Technol Environ 7:71–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain R (2015) Natural resource development for science, technology, and environmental policy issues: the case of hydraulic fracturing. Clean Technol Environ 17:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemeš JJ (2015) Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Clean Technol Environ 17:577–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardoyan A, Braun P (2015) Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. Int J Green Energy 12:405–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2013a) Study on agriculture decision–makers behavior on sustainable energy utilization. J Agric Environ Ethic 26:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2013b) Pretreatment of sunflower stalks for biogas production. Clean Technol Environ 15:735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2014) Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Technol Environ 16:1821–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolář L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Váchal J, Vaníčková R (2015a) Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Technol Environ 17:549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Váchal J, Vaníčková R (2015b) Processing of residues from biogas plants for energy purposes. Clean Technol Environ 3:797–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušková A, Braun P (2014) Holistic approach to improve the energy utilization of Jatropha curcas L. Rev Téc Ing Univ Zulia 37:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndeza A, Fidalgoa JM, Guerrerob F, Gascób G (2009) Characterization and pyrolysis behaviour of different paper mill waste materials. J Anal Appl Pyrol 86:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rongyue S, Yingjie L, Changtian L, Xin X, Chunmei L (2013) Utilization of lime mud from paper mill as CO2 sorbent in calcium looping process. Chem Eng J 221:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira P, Vallejo VR (2002) Labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen in organic matter decomposing at different depths in soil: an acid hydrolysis approach. Geoderma 107:109–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shirato Y, Yokozawa M (2006) Acid hydrolysis to partition plant material into decomposable and resistant fractions for use in the rothamsted carbon model. Soil Biol Biochem 38:812–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar SK (2003a) Sustainable development and sustainability metrics. AIChE J 49:1928–1932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar SK (2003b) Journey towards sustainable development: a role for chemical engineers. Environ Prog 22:227–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sládeček V (1967) The seventh conference of Czechoslovakian hydrobiologists. Hydrobiologia 29:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker M, Mercado H (2015) Environmentally responsible value orientations: perspectives from public assembly facility managers. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. doi:10.1002/csr.1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Zhao J, Bhattacharya J (2015) Optimal health and environmental policies in a pollution–growth nexus. J Environ Econ Manag 71:160–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirojanagud W, Tantemsapya N, Tantriratna P (2004) Precipitation of heavy metals by lime mud waste of pulp and paper mill. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 26:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradník J, Rychtera M, Kratochvíl J, Havlíčková L, Čermák J (1983) Production of biomass from sulphite liquors in tower fermentor with forced circulation. Collect Czech Chem Commun 48:1984–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Vochozka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vochozka, M., Maroušková, A., Váchal, J. et al. Reengineering the paper mill waste management. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 323–329 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1012-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1012-z

Keywords

Navigation