Abstract
The ability to learn and flexibly apply sophisticated concepts is thought by many to be what differentiates humans from all other animals. A basic assumption underlying this belief is that some “lower-order” associative learning mechanisms link perceptual events to specific reactions, whereas the kinds of verbalizable concepts that humans form depend on “higher-order” cognitive processes that rely less on perception and more on rational thought. Evidence in support of this interpretation comes largely from experiments in which animals either fail to learn or generalize concepts that humans readily learn, or learn them with great difficulty. Here, we argue that the formation of generalizable relational concepts may depend more on an individual’s capacity to shift attention than on the possession of representational processes that are unique to humans. Studies of relational concept learning in non-human animals show that they can learn generalizable concepts when conditions are favorable. In particular, repetition of similar training experiences appears to facilitate attentional redirection, thereby enabling animals to flexibly reenact past events and to judge the similarity of items within stimulus sets. The conditions that promote concept learning in humans may differ substantially from those experienced by most other animals. This does not imply, however, that either (1) conceptual learning mechanisms differ qualitatively from other learning mechanisms, or (2) that the processes that lead to concept formation in humans differ significantly from those present in other species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
No new data or materials are included in this paper.
Code availability
No code was used in relation to this paper.
References
Anderson EM, Chang Y, Hespos S, Gentner D (2018) Comparison within pairs promotes analogical abstraction in three-month-olds. Cognition 176:74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.008
Braslau-Scheck S (1994) Innovative behaviors and synchronization in bottlenosed dolphins. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu
Carstensen A, Frank MC (2021) Do graded representations support abstract thought? Curr Opin Behav Sci 37:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.10.009
Cook TW (1944) Repetition and learning. I. Stimulus and response. Psychol Rev 5:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058927
Cook RG, Qadri MAJ (2021) Examining the extents of same/different processing in non-human animals. Curr Opin Behav Sci 37:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.10.014
Cook RG, Cavoto KK, Cavoto BR (1995) Same-different texture-discrimination and concept-learning by pigeons. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 21(3):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.21.3.253
Cook RG, Katz JS, Cavoto BR (1997) Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 23(4):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.23.4.417
Custance DM, Bard KA, Whiten A (1995) Can young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) imitate arbitrary actions? Behaviour 132:837–859. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853995X00036
Darby CL, Riopelle AJ (1959) Observational learning in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Physiol Psychol 52:94–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046068
Diederich A, Trueblood JS (2018) A dynamic dual process model of risky decision making. Psychol Rev 125(2):270–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000087
Doumas LAA, Hummel JE, Sandhofer CM (2008) A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychol Rev 115(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.115.1.1
Dror S, Miklósi A, Sommese A, Temesi A, Fugazza C (2021) Acquisition and long-term memory of object names in a sample of Gifted Word Learner dogs. R Soc Open Sci 8:210976. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210976
Fetterman JG (1996) Dimensions of stimulus complexity. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 22:3–18
Fiacconi CM, Peter EL, Owais S, Kohler S (2016) Knowing by heart: visceral feedback shapes recognition memory judgments. J Exp Psychol-General 145(5):559–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000164
Fischer KW (1980) A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychol Rev 87:477–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477
Fischer KW (2008) Dynamic cycles of cognitive and brain development: measuring growth in mind, brain, and education. In: Battro AM, Fischer KW, Léna P (eds) The educated brain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 127–150
Fischer KW, Silvern L (1985) Stages and individual differences in cognitive development. Annu Rev Psychol 36:613–648. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.003145
Fugazza C, Pongracz P, Pogany A, Lenkei R, Miklosi A (2020) Mental representation and episodic-like memory of own actions in dogs. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67302-0
Galizio M, Bruce KE (2018) Abstraction, multiple exemplar training and the search for derived stimulus relations in animals. Perspect Behav Sci 41:45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0112-y
Gallistel CR, Balsam PD (2014) Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 108:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.11.019
Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2001) Computational versus associative models of simple conditioning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10(4):146–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00136
Geach P (1957) Mental acts: their content and their objects. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Gibson EJ (1977) How perception really develops: a view from outside the network. In: Laberge D, Samuels SJ (eds) Basic processes in reading: perception and comprehension. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 155–173
Goldstone RL, Barsalou LW (1998) Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition 65(2–3):231–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00047-4
Griebel U, Oller DK (2012) Vocabulary learning in a Yorkshire Terrier: slow mapping of spoken words. PLoS ONE 7(2):e30182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030182
Harlow HF (1949) The formation of learning sets. Psychol Rev 56(1):51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062474
Hayes KJ, Hayes C (1952) Imitation in a home-raised chimpanzee. J Comp Physiol Psychol 45:450–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053609
Herman LM (2002) Vocal, social, and self-imitation by bottlenose dolphins. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv C (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 63–106
Herman LM, Arbeit WR (1973) Stimulus control and auditory discrimination learning sets in the bottlenose dolphin. J Exp Anal Behav 19(3):379–394
Herman LM, Beach FA, Pepper RL, Stalling RB (1969) Learning-set formation in bottlenose dolphin. Psychon Sci 14(3):98–99. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332723
Herman LM, Gory JD, Hovancik JR, Bradshaw GL (1989) Generalization of visual matching by a bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)—evidence for invariance of cognitive performance with visual and auditory materials. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 15(2):124–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.15.2.124
Herman LM, Pack AA, Morrel-Samuels P (1993) Representational and conceptual skills of dolphins. In: Roitblat HL, Herman LM, Nachtigall PE (eds) Language and communication: comparative perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 403–442
Herman LM, Pack AA, Wood AM (1994) Bottlenosed dolphins can generalize rules and develop abstract concepts. Mar Mamm Sci 10(1):70–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1994.tb00390.x
Hochmann JR, Tuerk AS, Sanborn S, Zhu R, Long R, Dempster M, Carey S (2017) Children’s representation of abstract relations in relational/array match-to-sample tasks. Cogn Psychol 99:17–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.001
James W (1890) Principles of psychology. Holt, New York
Jamrozik A, Gentner D (2020) Relational labeling unlocks inert knowledge. Cognition 196:104146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104146
Kaminski J, Call J, Fischer J (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “fast mapping.” Science 304:1682–1683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097859
Katz JS, Wright AA (2006) Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 32(1):80–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80
Katz JS, Wright AA (2021) Issues in the comparative cognition of same/different abstract-concept learning. Curr Opin Behav Sci 37:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.009
Katz JS, Wright AA, Bachevalier J (2002) Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 28(4):358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.28.4.358
Katz JS, Wright AA, Bodily KD (2007) Issues in the comparative cognition of abstract-concept learning. Compar Cogn Behav Rev 2:79–92. https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2008.20005
Köhler W (1925) The mentality of apes. Harcourt Press, San Diego
Krechevsky I (1932) “Hypotheses” in rats. Psychol Rev 39:516–533
Lea SEG, de Filippo G, Meier C (2022) Location as a feature in pigeons’ recognition of visual objects. J Exp Psychol: Anim Learn Cogn 48:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000250
Levine M (1959) A model of hypothesis behavior in discrimination learning set. Psychol Rev 66(6):353–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044050
Levine M, Levinson B, Harlow HF (1959) Trials per problem as a variable in the acquisition of discrimination learning set. J Comp Physiol Psychol 52(4):396–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046684
Lovejoy AO (1936) The great chain of being. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lubow RE (1974) High-order concept formation in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 21:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.21-475
Matlen BJ, Gentner D, Franconeri SL (2020) Spatial alignment facilitates visual comparison. Hum Percept Perform 46:443–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000726
Mercado E III (2008) Neural and cognitive plasticity: from maps to minds. Psychol Bull 134(1):109–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.109
Mercado E III (2016) Commentary: interpretations without justification: a general argument against Morgan’s Canon. Front Psychol 7:452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00452
Mercado E III, Murray SO, Uyeyama RK, Pack AA, Herman LM (1998) Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule. Anim Learn Behav 26(2):210–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199213
Mercado E III, Uyeyama RK, Pack AA, Herman LM (1999) Memory for action events in the bottlenosed dolphin. Anim Cogn 2:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050021
Mercado E III, Killebrew DA, Pack AA, Macha IVB, Herman LM (2000) Generalization of “same-different” classification abilities in bottlenosed dolphins. Behav Proc 50(2–3):79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00100-5
Morgan CL (1903) Introduction to comparative psychology. Walter Scott, New York
Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Matsuzawa T (1999) Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 113:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.2.128
Newman RS, Rowe ML, Ratner NB (2015) Input and uptake at 7 months predicts toddler vocabulary: the role of child-directed speech and infant processing skills in language development. J Child Lang 43:1158–1173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000446
Obozova T, Smirnova A, Zorina Z, Wasserman E (2015) Analogical reasoning in amazons. Anim Cogn 18:1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0882-0
Oden DL, Premack D, Thompson RKR (1988) Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 14(2):140–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.14.2.140
Oden DL, Thompson RKR, Premack D (1990) Infant chimpanzees spontaneously perceive both concrete and abstract same different relations. Child Dev 61(3):621–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02807.x
Pack AA, Herman LM (1995) Sensory integration in the bottlenosed dolphin: immediate recognition of complex shapes across the senses of echolocation and vision. J Acoust Soc Am 98(2):722–733. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413566
Pack AA, Herman LM, Hoffmann-Kuhnt M, Branstetter BK (2002) The object behind the echo: dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) perceive object shape globally through echolocation. Behav Proc 58(1–2):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00200-5
Penn DC, Povinelli DJ (2007) Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. Annu Rev Psychol 58:97–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555
Penn DC, Povinelli DJ (2012) The human enigma. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG (eds) The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 529–542
Penn DC, Holyoak KJ, Povinelli DJ (2008) Darwin’s mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behav Brain Sci 31(2):109–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525x08003543
Pepperberg IM (1987) Acquisition of the same different concept by an African gray parrot (Psittacus erithacus)—Learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Anim Learn Behav 15(4):423–432. https://doi.org/10.3758/Bf03205051
Piaget J (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. International University Press, New York
Piaget J (1962) Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. W.W. Norton, New York
Pilley JW, Reid AK (2011) Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behav Proc 86:184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.11.007
Pope SM, Russell JL, Hopkins WD (2015) The association between imitation recognition and socio-communicative competencies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Front Psychol 6:188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00188
Povinelli DJ, Vonk J (2003) Chimpanzee minds: suspiciously human? Trends Cogn Sci 7(4):157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00053-6
Premack D (2010) Why humans are unique: three theories. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356782
Premack D, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behav Brain Sci 1(4):515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525x00076512
Pryor KW (2015) Creating creative animals. In: Kaufman A, Kaufman J (eds) Animal creativity and innovation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 483–498
Pryor KW, Chase S (2014) Training for variable and innovative behavior. Int J Comp Psychol 27:218–225. https://doi.org/10.5070/P4272022389
Pryor KW, Haag R, O’Reilly J (1969) The creative porpoise: training for novel behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 12:653–661. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-653
Roitblat HL, Penner RH, Nachtigall PE (1990) Matching-to-sample by an echolocating dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 16(1):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.16.1.85
Rosenbaum DA, Carlson RA, Gilmore RO (2001) Acquisition of intellectual and perceptual–motor skills. Annu Rev Psychol 52:453–470. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.453
Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. Hutchinson of London, London
Scagel A (2022) An examination of the ability of domestic dogs to form abstract concepts. Unpublished doctoral disserttion, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo
Scagel A, Mercado E III (2022a) Do that again! Memory for self-performed actions in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000310
Scagel A, Mercado III E (2022b) Same-different conceptualization in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Compar Psychol
Schusterman RJ, Reichmuth C (2008) Novel sound production through contingency learning in the Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens). Anim Cogn 11:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0120-5
Smirnova A, Zorina Z, Obozova T, Wasserman E (2015) Crows spontaneously exhibit analogical reasoning. Curr Biol 25:256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.063
Smith JD, Redford JS, Haas SM, Coutinho MVC, Couchman JJ (2008) The comparative psychology of same-different judgments by humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 34(3):361–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.34.3.361
Smith LB, Jayaraman S, Clerkin E, Yu C (2018) The developing infant creates a curriculum for statistical learning. Trends Cogn Sci 22:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.004
Smith JD, Jackson BN, Church BA (2019) Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: relational matching and working memory. Mem Cognit 47(3):544–560. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0890-9
Steirn JN, Thomas RK (1990) Comparative assessments of intelligence—performances of Homo sapiens sapiens on hierarchies of oddity and sameness difference tasks. J Comp Psychol 104(4):326–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.104.4.326
Terrace H (2019) Why chimpanzees can’t learn language and humans can. Columbia University Press, New York
Thompson RKR, Oden DL (1995) A profound disparity revisited: perception and judgment of abstract identity relations by chimpanzees, human infants, and monkeys. Behav Proc 35(1–3):149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(95)00048-8
Thompson RKR, Oden DL (2000) Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: the paleological monkey and the analogical ape. Cogn Sci 24(3):363–396. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2403_2
Thompson RKR, Oden DL, Boysen ST (1997) Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 23(1):31–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.23.1.31
Thorndike EL (1931) The influence of frequency of occurrence on a connection: the principle of belonging. In: Thorndike EL (ed) Human learning. Century, New York, pp 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/11243-002
VanLehn K (1996) Cognitive skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol 47:513–539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.513
Wasserman EA, Young ME (2010) Same-different discrimination: the keel and backbone of thought and reasoning. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 36(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016327
Wasserman EA, Hugart JA, Kirkpatrick-Steger K (1995) Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual-stimuli. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Process 21(3):248–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.21.3.248
Wasserman EA, Fagot J, Young ME (2001) Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio): the role of entropy. J Comp Psychol 115(1):42–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.42
Wasserman EA, Young ME, Castro L (2021) Mechanisms of same-different conceptualization: entropy happens! Curr Opin Behav Sci 37:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.001
Wright AA, Katz JS (2006) Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Behav Proc 72(3):234–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009
Wright AA, Shyan MR, Jitsumori M (1990) Auditory same different concept-learning by monkeys. Anim Learn Behav 18(3):287–294. https://doi.org/10.3758/Bf03205288
Zentall TR, Wasserman EA, Lazareva OF, Thompson RKR, Rattermann MJ (2008) Concept learning in animals. Compar Cogn Behav Rev 3:13–45. https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2008.30002
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mercado, E., Scagel, A. Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition. Anim Cogn 26, 141–151 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01702-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01702-9