Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation of unconsolidated undrained shear behaviour of peat

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study conducted a series of standard classifications to determine the physical properties of peat, followed by 28 unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests to investigate undrained peat shear behaviour. Results show that the undrained deviatoric shear resistance of peat grows continuously with increasing shear strain, but ends up with no obvious peak strength even at very large strain (i.e. 25%). The shear stiffness of peat specimens degrades substantially with increasing shear strain. To make the stiffness of peat specimens comparable, the secant shear modulus G is then normalized with the shear modulus \({G}_{0.1\%}\) at relatively small strain of 0.1%. Furthermore, results from 16 previous unconsolidated undrained tests and 66 consolidated undrained tests available in literature were taken into account together with 28 lab test data obtained in this study, aiming to reveal the general behaviour of peat shear stiffness degradation. For all the test data, the shear strain \(\gamma\) is normalized with a reference strain \({\gamma }_{\mathrm{ref},0.1\%}\), at which the stiffness \(G\)/\({G}_{0.1\%}\) = 0.5. A hyperbolic function is then adopted to fit the relationship between the normalised stiffness versus the normalised shear strain. Over 78% of the data falls within a ± 30% margin within 5% shear strain, while the predicted stiffness out of the margin is usually underestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K, Richards PG (2009) Quantitative seismology. University Science Book, California America

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang E, Loehr JE (2003) Specimen size effects for fiber-reinforced silty clay in unconfined compression. Geotech Test J 26(2):191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D1997–91 (2008) Standard test method for laboratory determination of the fiber content of peat samples by dry mass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D2850–95 (1999) Standard test method for unconlidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Berre T (1982) Triaxial testing at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute. ASTM Geotech Test J 5(1/2):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan N (2008) The shear strength of peat. University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland (Ph.D. thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • BS1377–2 (1990) Method of test for soils for civil engineering purposes (classification tests). British Standards Institution (BSI), London

    Google Scholar 

  • BS1377–3 (1990) Method of test for soils for civil engineering purposes (chemical and electrol-chemical tests). British Standards Institution (BSI), London

    Google Scholar 

  • BS1377–8 (1990) Method of test for soils for civil engineering purposes (shear strength test: effective stress). British Standards Institution (BSI), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cola S, Cortellazzo G (2005) The shear strength behavior of two peaty soils. Geotech Geol Eng 23(6):679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan J (2009) Baseline monitoring survey of blanket bog vegetation at Curragh Mountain windfarm Millstreet Co Cork. Ecological Report to SSE Renewables

  • Coutinho RQ, Lacerda WA (1989) Strength characteristics of Juturnaiba organic clays. 12th ICSMFE, 3:1731–1734, Rio de Janerio, Brazil

  • Culloch FM (2006) Guidelines for the risk management of peat slips on the construction of low volume/low cost road over peat. Forestry Civil Engineering, Forestry Commission, Scotland, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (PhD thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell ER, Hebib S (1998) The determination of the geotechnical parameters of organic soils. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Problematic Soils, Is-Tohoku 98, Sendai, Japan, pp 33–36

  • Garnier P (2007) Influence of L’anisotropie d’une tourbe sur la capacite portante d’un remblai ferroviaire. University Laval, Quebec (Master Thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) (2006) Landslides in Ireland. Irish Landslides Working Group, Department of Communications Marine and Natural Resources, Ireland

  • Gui Y, Fang J et al (2016) (2016) Direct shear strength characteristics and mechanism of high decomposition peat soil. J Hohai Univ (nat Sci Edn ) 5:418–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div 6(7):667–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry MT, Sharma JS, Martin CD, Barbour SL (2012) Effect stiffness and shear strength of peat. Can Geotech J 49:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang PT, Patel M, Santagata MC, Bobet A (2009) Classification of organic soils. School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/2. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2676&context=jtrp. Accessed 15 Jul 2017

  • Huat BBK, Sina K et al (2011) State of an art review of peat: general perspective. Int J Phys Sci 6(8):1988–1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishida T, Boulanger R, Wehling TM et al (2006) Variation of small strain stiffness for peat and organic soil. In: Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA, pp 1057–1068

  • Konstantinou M (2017) Dynamic behaviour of Groningen peat. Feiten en Cijfers, Nehterlands, pp 75–79 (Laboratory test report, Deltares)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landva A, Korpijaakko EO, Pheeney PE (1983) Geotechnical classification of peats and organic soils. In: Testing of Peats and Organic Soils. ASTM International, Pennsylvania, pp 37–51

  • Landva A, Pheeney PE, LaRochelle P, Briaud JL (1986) Structures on peatland – geotechnical investigations. In: Proceedings Advances in Peatlands Engineering, Ottawa, pp 31–52

  • Mitachi T, Fujiwara Y (1987) Undrained shear behavior of clays undergoing long-term anisotropic consolidation : Soils Found. Int J Rock Mech Mining 27(4):45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro R (2005) Dealing with bearing capacity problems on low volume roads constructed on peat. Roadex II Northern Periphery, pp 17–22

  • Muntohar AS (2011) Effect of specimen size on the tensile strength behavior of the plastic waste fiber reinforced soil–lime–rice husk ash mixtures. Civ Eng Dimens 13(2):82–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraro S (2019) The deviatoric behaviour of peat: a route between past empiricism and future perspectives. Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg, Netherlands (Ph.D. thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura S, Minh NA, Jardine RJ (2007) Shear strength anisotropy of natural London clay. Geotechnique 57(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly BC (2004) Accurate determination of moisture content of organic soils using the oven drying method. Dry Technol 22(7):1767–1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly BC (2015) Effective stress strength testing of peat. Environ Geotech 2:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly BC, Zhang L (2013) Consolidated-drained triaxial compression testing of peat. Geotech Test J 36(3):310–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar T, Sadrekarimi A (2015) Specimen size effects on behavior of loose sand in triaxial compression tests. Can Geotech J 52(6):732–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts DM, Zdravković L (1999) Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering:Theory, Volume 1, Thomas Telford, 1999

  • Powrie W (1997) Soil mechanics: concepts and application. CRC Press, London UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saarenketo T et al (1992) GPR applications in geotechnical investigations of peat for road survey purposes, vol. 16. In: Fourth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, pp 293–305. (Special Paper 16)

  • Song BW (2002) The Influence of initial static shear stress on Post Cyclic degradation of non-plastic silt. Lowl Technol Int 4(2):14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe KH, Rosenblad BL (1999) Offshore geotechnical investigations with shear waves. In: Proceedings of the Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, pp 105–114

  • Trafford A, Long M (2016) Some recent developments on geophysical testing of peat. In: Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting Challenges in Nordic Geotechnic, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 215–224

  • Vardanega PJ, Bolton MD (2013) Stiffness of clays and silts: normalizing shear modulus and shear strain. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(9):1575–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu B, Tewari VC (2014) Geotechnical application of ground penetrating radar (GPR). Jour Ind Geol Cong 6(1):35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Post L, Granlund E (1926) Peat resources in southern Sweden. Sver Geol Unders Yearbook 335(2):1–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehling TM, Boulanger R, Arulnathan R, Harder LF, Driller MW (2003) Nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous organic soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(10):929–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM (1990) Soil behavior and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong EL, Ren YF, Li WL (2006) Mechanical properties of Kunming peat. Soil Eng Found 20(1):53–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y (2008) Engineering geological characteristics and deformation settlement of peat soil in seasonal frozen area. Jilin University, Jilin, China (A Master Degree Thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi H, Ohira Y, Kogure K, Mori S (1985) Undrained shear characteristics of normally consolidated peat under triaxial compression and extension conditions. Soils Found 25:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zainorabidin A, Mohamad HMB (2015) Pre- and post-cyclic behavior on monotonic shear strength of penor peat. Electron J Geotech Eng 20(16):6927–6935

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainorabidin A, Mohamad HMB (2017) The small strain effects to the shear strength and maximum stiffness of post-cyclic degradation of hemic peat soil. Int J Civ Environ Eng 11(9):1192–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, O’Kelly BC, Nagel T (2017) Tensile and compressive contributions of fibres in peat. In: Poromechanics VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Biot Conference On poromechanics, pp 1466–1473

  • Zhang Y (2011) Study on permeability deformation characteristics and deformation constitutive model of peat soil in Kunming basin. Kunming University of science and technology, Kunming (A Master Degree Thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolkefle SNA (2014) The dynamic properties of peat soil in south west of Johor. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia (A Master Degree Thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwanenburg C, Jardine R (2015) Laboratory in situ and full-scale load tests to assess flood embankment stability on peat. Geotechnique 65(4):309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mike Long in University College Dublin and Dr. Andrew Trafford for their invaluable advice and support.

Funding

This work was supported by Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences (iCRAG), Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), School of Engineering in University College Cork, and the Hebei University of Technology (2017HW0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zili Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Xu, D., McCarthy, E. et al. Experimental investigation of unconsolidated undrained shear behaviour of peat. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02541-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02541-7

Keywords

Navigation