Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of correlations between shear wave velocities and CPT data: a case study at Eskisehir in Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic waves result from fault movement during earthquakes. Depending on the features of the physical environment through which they pass, there are variations in the velocity and amplitude of body waves, which occur underground, and surface waves, which occur on the Earth’s surface. The ratio of shear wave velocity (V s) to near-surface velocity is a parameter used widely in land use planning to predict the potential for amplified seismic shaking, especially in urban areas. The main objective of this study was to estimate V s by using cone resistance (q c) and lateral friction (f s) for a study area at Eskisehir Graben, to help mitigate geotechnical earthquake engineering problems in civil engineering and land use planning. In geotechnical shallow soil research, certain geophysical methods are used for measuring V s —a major form of seismic energy propagation—at the near surface. In this study, cone penetrometer data collected from seismic cone penetration tests (SCPT) includes q c, f s, and downhole V s. S-type seismic energy waveforms, which are produced on the surface, were measured at different depths using an S-type geophone in the city center of Eskisehir via SCPT. With SCPT, q c, friction ratios (R f), and V s values were measured at 42 different test points. R f properties are associated with soil thickness, and these were compared with dynamic soil properties (V s) using a standard statistical method; we calculated correlations amongst V s, q c, and R f measured from cone penetration tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altunel E, Barka A (1998) Neotectonic activity of Eskişehir fault zone between İnönü and Sultandere. Geol Bull Turk 41(2):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Azdiken, S, Çatalyürekli E (2001) General Directoratio of State Hydraulic Works, Eskişehir Odunpazari Municipality Geophysics Resistivity Report

  • Barrow BL, Stokoe KE (1983) Field investigation of liquefaction sites in Northern California, Geotechnical Engineering Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

  • Boore DM (2004) Estimating Vs30(or NEHRP site classes) from shallow velocity models (depths <30 m). Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(2):591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer J, Ghose R, Helbig K et al. (1997) The improvement of geotechnical subsurface models through the application of S-wave reflection seismic exploration. 3rd EEGS Meeting

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (1991) NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings: Part 2: Commentary. Earthquake Hazard Reductions Series, US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (1994) National earthquake hazard reduction program (NEHRP) recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings’. Part I, Provisions. BSSC, Washington, DC

  • Campanella R, Baziw E, Sully J (1989) Interpretation of seismic cone data using digital filtering techniques. Department of Civil Engineering. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Emre Ö, Duman TY, Özalp S et al. (2013) Active fault map of Turkey with explanatory text. Special Publication Series-30, MTA (Mineral Research & Exploration General Directoratio), Ankara, Turkey

  • Ersoy İ (1956) Eskişehir earthquake. Arkitekt 284(2):74–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer TL, Padovani AC, Bennett MJ et al (2005) Mapping NEHRP VS30 site classes. Earthq Spectr 21(2):353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter J, Benjumea B, Harris J et al (2002) Surface and downhole shear wave seismic methods for thick soil site investigations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9):931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R (1995) The CPT test. Equipment–testing–evaluation. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Information No. 15E

  • Luna R, Jadi H (2000) Determination of dynamic soil properties using geophysical methods. In: Proceedings of the First I nternational Conference on the Application of Geophysical and NDT Methodologies to Transportation Facilities and Infrastructure , St. Louis, MO, December 2000

  • Lunne T, Robertson P, Powell J (1997) Cone penetration testing in Geotechnical Practice. Blackie/Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayne P, Rix G (1995) Correlations between cone tip resistance and shear wave velocity in natural clay. Soils Found 35(2):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mola-Abasi H, Dikmen U, Shooshpasha I (2015) Prediction of shear-wave velocity from CPT data at Eskisehir (Turkey), using a polynomial model. Near Surf Geophys 13(2):155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocakoğlu F (2007) A re-evaluation of the Eskişehir Fault Zone as a Recent extensional structure in NW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 31(2):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ölmez E, Yücel B (1985) Geothermal Energy Potentiality of the near region and Eskisehir city

  • Ölmez E, Demirel Z, Uzel ÖF (1986) The report of deep borehole data Eskisehir ES-1 and ES 2, Report No:8142, MTA (Mineral Research & Exploration General Directoratio), Ankara, Turkey

  • Orhan A (2005) The geo-engineering properties of foundation soils in southern part of Eskisehir city center and applying of geographic information system (in Turkish). PhD thesis, Eskisehir Osmangazi Univertsity, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences

  • Özmen B (2000) The damage distribution of August 1999 Izmit earthquake (numerical data). Earthquake Foundation of Turkey, TDV/DR 010-53: 132

  • Pekkan E, Tun M, Guney Y et al (2015) Integratiod seismic risk analysis using simple weighting method: the case of residential Eskişehir, Turkey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15(6):1123–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella R (1984b) Guidelines for use and interpretation of the electronic cone penetration test, Soil Mechanics, Series No:69. Department of Civil Engineering. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella R, Gillespie D et al (1986) Seismic CPT to measure in situ shear wave velocity. J Geotech Eng 112(8):791–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevinçli T, Çatalyürekli E (2001) General Directoratio of State Hydraulic Works, Eskişehir Tepebasi Municipality Geophysics Resistivity Report

  • Seyitoğlu G, Ecevitoğlu GB, Kaypak B et al (2015) Determining the main strand of the Eskişehir strike-slip fault zone using subsidiary structures and seismicity: a hypothesis tested by seismic reflection studies. Turk J Earth Sci 24(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tün M (2003) Investigation of change in shear wave velocity (Vs) by soil properties and determination of soil natural period (T 0) in the Eskisehir Urban Area (in Turkish). Master’s Thesis, Anadolu University Graduate School of Sciences, Department of Physics

  • Xia J, Miller RD, Park CB et al (2002) Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave with borehole measurements. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(3):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaltırak C (2002) Tectonic evolution of the Marmara sea and its surroundings. Mar Geol 190(1):493–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yücel B (1986) The report of deep borehole data Eskisehir ES-3, Report No:8142, MTA (Mineral Research & Exploration General Directoratio), Ankara, Turkey

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Anadolu University Department of Scientific Research Projects, under project number 000401 and 1605F404. We would like to thank Associate Professor Dr. Hakan A. Nefeslioglu, A. Dagliyar, and S. Azdiken for collecting data and applying SCPT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muammer Tun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tun, M., Ayday, C. Investigation of correlations between shear wave velocities and CPT data: a case study at Eskisehir in Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 225–236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0987-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0987-y

Keywords

Navigation