Skip to main content
Log in

DEA cone ratio model based on a paired comparison

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is well known as evaluation method to measure the efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs) relatively with multiple inputs and outputs items. One of the features of DEA is that DMUs are evaluated based on the Pareto optimal line composed of efficient DMUs (this line is called as “Efficiency Frontier” in DEA). As the efficiency value of the target DMU is calculated by the relative comparison between the current DMU and the point on the efficiency frontier which is the easiest to achieve, the compared points differ for every DMU. Therefore, it is possible to evaluate the efficiency of DMUs relatively considering features of them. On the other hand, there are many cases that a certain adjustment about the data is necessary to make some decisions from the objective results of DEA. To analyze the DEA results continuously, this paper proposed the DEA framework. A proposed framework consists of two following steps: (1) extracting subjectivity information based on a paired comparison, (2) extending the traditional DEA model. The proposed model does not add restrictions to a variable directly and it is formulated in the form where it corrects the search direction, “No solution” does not come out of it. Since the proposed model is correcting the search direction, an analyst’s intention is incorporated without taking out an execution impossible solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson RG, Singleton FD, Thrall RM, Smith BA (1986) Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S (2008) A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 54:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aoki S, Sato Y, Tsuji H (2007) Hierarchical search for improvement direction by data envelopment analysis. In: Proc of the 8th Asia Pacific industrial engineering and management system APIEMS, paper ID = 604, total 9 pages in CD-ROM

  6. Sueyoshi T, Onishi K, Kinase Y (1999) A bench mark approach for baseball evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 115:429–428

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang T, Wang H (2007) Application of DEA model to evaluate operating performance in Taiwan DRA industry. In: Proc of the 8th Asia Pacific industrial engineering and management system APIEMS, paper ID = 604, total 8 pages in CD-ROM

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazushige Inoue.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamitaka, Y., Aoki, S. & Inoue, K. DEA cone ratio model based on a paired comparison. Artif Life Robotics 24, 415–421 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-019-00535-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-019-00535-z

Keywords

Navigation