Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to undertake a 5-year review of the OMX temporomandibular prosthetic total joint replacement system (OMX-TMJ).
Methods
Data was collected from patients who had an OMX-TMJ implanted between May 2015 and November 2020 at Epworth-Freemasons and St. Vincent’s hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. The data points included patient demographics, primary diagnosis, and clinical outcomes in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, maximum inter-incisal mouth opening, and complication events.
Results
There were 206 OMX-TMJ devices implanted in 151 patients over the 5-year study period. The vast majority were female patients (n = 137, 90.7%) with a mean age of 44.8 years (range 20–76 years) at the time of surgery. Most patients presented with primary (idiopathic) osteoarthritis (119 joints—57.8%) that failed to respond to conservative measures. Based on a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range 12 months to 73 months), the average mouth opening improved from 30.8 mm pre-surgery to an average of 39.1 mm following OMX-TMJ surgery (p < 0.05). Joint pain (VAS: 0–10) significantly improved from 6.14 pre-surgery to 0.87 following OMX-TMJ surgery (p < 0.001). Twenty-one patients (13.9%) experienced device-related complications which resulted in explantation of 7 (3.4%) OMX-TMJ devices over the 5-year period.
Conclusion
This study shows that the OMX-TMJ prosthetic total joint replacement system is a reasonably safe, versatile, and reliable implant that effectively improves mandibular opening and reduces joint pain across a broad range of end-stage TMJ disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elledge R, Mercuri LG, Attard A, Green J, Speculand B (2019) Review of emerging temporomandibular joint total joint replacement systems. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:722–728
Mian M, Ackland D, Fink S, Wang N, Dimitroulis G (2021) Accuracy of custom temporomandibular joint replacement surgery using a virtual surgical planning protocol. Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:367–371
Sembronio S, Tel A, Robiony M (2021) The use of cutting/positioning devices for custom-fitted temporomandibular joint alloplastic reconstruction: current knowledge and development of a new system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:530–537
Merema BJ, Kraeima J, Witjes MJH, van Bakelen NB, Spijkervet FKL (2021) Accuracy of fit analysis of the patient-specific Groningen temporomandibular joint prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:538–545
Kanatsios S, Breik O, Dimitroulis G (2018) Biomet stock temporomandibular joint prosthesis: Long-term outcomes of the use of titanium condyles secured with four or five condylar fixation screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46:1697–1702
Dimitroulis G. (2018) Management of temporomandibular joint disorders: a surgeon’s perspective. Aust Dent J. Mar;63 Suppl 1:S79-S90.
Dimitroulis G (2013) A new surgical classification for temporomandibular joint disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:218–222
Ackland DC, Robinson D, Redhead M, Lee PVS, Moskaljuk A, Dimitroulis G (2017) A personalised 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint: from implant design to implantation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:404–411
Ackland D, Robinson D, Lee PVS, Dimitroulis G (2018) Design and clinical outcome of a novel 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 56:52–60
Dimitroulis G, Austin S, Sin Lee PV, Ackland DJ (2018) A new three-dimensional, print-on-demand temporomandibular prosthetic total joint replacement system: preliminary outcomes. Craniomaxillofac Surg 46:1192–1199
Mian M, Fink S, Ackland D, Wang N, Dimitroulis G (2020) Accuracy of orthopantomograms in the assessment of implant position following alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:203–209
De Meurechy NKG, Zaror CE, Mommaerts MY (2020) Total temporomandibular joint replacement: stick to stock or optimization by customization? Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 13:59–70
Gruber EA, McCullough J, Sidebottom AJ (2015) Medium-term outcomes and complications after total replacement of the temporomandibular joint. Prospective outcome analysis after 3 and 5 years. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:412–415
Leandro LF, Ono HY, Loureiro CC, Marinho K, Guevara HA (2013) A ten-year experience and follow-up of three hundred patients fitted with the Biomet/Lorenz Microfixation TMJ replacement system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1007–1013
De Meurechy N, Mommaerts MY (2018) Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement systems: a systematic review of their history. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:743–754
Sembronio S, Tel A, Robiony M (2021) Protocol for fully digital and customized management of concomitant temporomandibular joint replacement and orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:212
Humphries LS, Shakir A, Figueroa AA, Mercuri LG, Dianiskova S, Reid RR, Tragos C (2020) Custom alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction: expanding reconstructive horizons. J Craniofac Surg 31:1651–1658
Amarista FJ, Mercuri LG, Perez D (2020) Temporomandibular joint prosthesis revision and/or replacement survey and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78:1692–1703
Machoň V, Levorová J, Hirjak D, Drahoš M, Brizman E, Beňo M, Foltán R (2020) Evaluation of complications following stock replacement of the temporomandibular joint performed between the years 2006 and 2015: a retrospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:373–379
Lee KC, Chintalapudi N, Halepas S, Chuang SK, Selvi F (2021) The healthcare burden and associated adverse events from total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a national United States perspective. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:236–241
Kim JH, Kim MY, Knowles JC, Choi S, Kang H, Park SH, Park SM, Kim HW, Park JT, Lee JH, Lee HH (2020) Mechanophysical and biological properties of a 3D-printed titanium alloy for dental applications. Dent Mater 36:945–958
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Epworth Hospital Melbourne—EH2020-576.
Consent to participate
Not required, data collection de-identified.
Conflicts of interest
The senior author (GD) holds shares in MAXONIQ, the company that manufactures the device discussed in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brierly, G., Thomas, A. & Dimitroulis, G. A five-year review of the OMX temporomandibular prosthetic total joint replacement system. Oral Maxillofac Surg 27, 131–139 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-01032-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-01032-z