Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and utility of intraoral ultrasound as a real-time guidance technique in trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS).
Methods
We report our early experiences of radiologist-operated intraoral ultrasound during TORS, providing information on tumour margin and important adjacent structures. Resection specimens were sonographically imaged for margin assessment.
Results
Four patients underwent ultrasound-guided TORS, with a close correlation between intraoperative and preoperative imaging in each case. The tumour was fully excised in three cases (one did not proceed due to difficult access). No ultrasound-related adverse events occurred, surgical margins were negative, and the treated patients are currently in a state of remission, with functional swallows.
Conclusion
Intraoperative ultrasound can allow previously inaccessible disease to be robotically resected with confidence. Sonographic interrogation of the resected specimen correlated closely with histological margin analysis, and a novel technique of using saline to improve ultrasound conductance and therefore image quality is described.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hockstein NG, Nolan JP, O’Malley BW Jr, Woo YJ (2005) Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: a technical feasibility study using the da Vinci surgical robot and an airway mannequin. Laryngoscope 115:780–785
Hockstein NG, Nolan P, O’Malley BW Jr, Woo YJ (2005) Robot-assisted microlaryngeal surgery: results of robotic cadaver dissections. Laryngoscope 115:1003–1008
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Hockstein NG (2005) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS): supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 115:1315–1319
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Rinaldo A et al (2015) Understanding contraindications for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:1551–1552
Baskin RM, Boyce BJ, Amdur R, Mendenhall WM, Hitchcock K, Silver N, Dziegielewski PT (2018) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: patient selection and special considerations. Cancer Manag Res 10:839–846
Kwan BYM, Khan NM, de Almeida JR et al (2019) Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck malignancies: imaging features in presurgical workup. Head & Neck 41(11):4018–4025
Weinstein GS, O'Malley BW, Magnuson JS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope. 122:1701–1707
Park DA, Lee MJ, Kim S-H, Lee SH (2019) Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:S0748–S7983
Ford SE, Brandwein-Gensler M, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL, Magnuson JS (2014) Transoral robotic versus open surgical approaches to oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma by human papillomavirus status. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(4):606–611
White H, Ford S, Bush B, Holsinger FC, Moore E, Ghanem T, Carroll W, Rosenthal E, Sweeny L, Magnuson JS (2013) Salvage surgery for recurrent cancers of the oropharynx: comparing TORS with standard open surgical approaches. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(8):773–777
O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116(8):1465–1472
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(12):1220–1226
Paleri V, Fox H, Coward S, Ragbir M, McQueen A, Ahmed O, Meikle D, Saleh D, O'Hara J, Robinson M (2018) Transoral robotic surgery for residual and recurrent oropharyngeal cancers: exploratory study of surgical innovation using the IDEAL framework for early-phase surgical studies. Head & Neck 40:512–525
Goepfert RP, Liu C, Ryan WR (2015) Trans-oral robotic surgery and surgeon-performed trans-oral ultrasound for intraoperative location and excision of an isolated retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 36(5):710–714
Clayburgh DR, Byrd JK, Bonfili J, Duvvuri U (2016) Intraoperative ultrasonography during transoral robotic surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125(1):37–42
Fornage BD, Edeiken BS, Clayman GL (2014) Use of transoral sonography with an endocavitary transducer in diagnosis, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and intraoperative localization of retropharyngeal masses. Am J Roentgenol 202(5):W481–W486
Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, Verzijlbergen FJ, Barrington SF, Pike LC, Weber WA, Stroobants S, Delbeke D, Donohoe KJ, Holbrook S, Graham MM, Testanera G, Hoekstra OS, Zijlstra J, Visser E, Hoekstra CJ, Pruim J, Willemsen A, Arends B, Kotzerke J, Bockisch A, Beyer T, Chiti A, Krause BJ, European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) (2015) FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(2):328–354
Loevner LA, Learned KO, Mohan S, O’Malley BW Jr, Scanlon MH, Rassekh CH, Weinstein GS (2013) Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: what radiologists need to know about the cutting edge. RadioGraphics. 33(6):1759–1779
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Institutional ethical approval was obtained from the Royal Marsden Hospital Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, E.D., Paleri, V., Hardman, J.C. et al. Integrated surgery and radiology: trans-oral robotic surgery guided by real-time radiologist-operated intraoral ultrasound. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24, 477–483 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00880-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00880-5