Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dentoskeletal changes and their correlations after micro-implant-assisted palatal expansion (MARPE) in adults with advanced midpalatal suture ossification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate and correlate the dentoskeletal changes of adult patients after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) in the two final stages of midpalatal suture ossification.

Materials and methods

This interventional pre-post clinical study consisted of 20 adults (24.9±1.8 years), with transverse maxillary atresia, divided into two subgroups (n=10) based on the ossification degree of the midpalatal suture: stage D, fusion completed in the palatine bone; and stage E, fusion anteriorly in the maxilla. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) time intervals were used to evaluate the anterior and posterior sutural opening, activation of the expander screw, vestibular-lingual inclinations, and widths of first premolars and first molars. Maxillary interincisor diastema was measured on patients’ plaster models in the same timepoints. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, generalized linear models (GLM), and chi-square (χ2) test were employed.

Results

All variables significantly increased after MARPE therapy regardless of the ossification degree (P<0.05). Patients with stage D suture presented wider interincisal diastema and maxillary suture opening (on both regions, anterior and posterior) when compared with patients with stage E (P<0.05). Maxillary interincisor diastema was positively associated with anterior and posterior suture opening for all subjects (P<0.05). MARPE therapy was unsuccessful in six patients, mostly presented by individuals with E maturation stage of the midpalatal suture.

Conclusions

After MARPE, a significant correction in the transverse defect of the maxillary basal bone was achieved for adults in the last two midpalatal suture maturation stages.

Clinical relevance

Adult patients in stage D of maxillary suture ossification are more susceptible to dentoskeletal changes following MARPE therapy as compared to patients with stage E.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G (2015) Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. https://doi.org/10.2319/030514-156.1

  2. Canan S, Şenışık NE (2017) Comparison of the treatment effects of different rapid maxillary expansion devices on the maxilla and the mandible. Part 1: Evaluation of dentoalveolar changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.11.022

  3. Ghislanzoni LH, Lione R, Franchi L, Cozza P (2018) Qualitative description of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a three-dimensional perspective. Iran J Orthod. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijo.7844

  4. Di Ventura A, Lanteri V, Farronato G, Gaffuri F, Beretta M, Lanteri C, Cossellu G (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of rapid maxillary expansion anchored to primary molars: direct effects on maxillary arch and spontaneous mandibular response. Eur J Paediatr Dent. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.01.08

  5. Seo YJ, Chung KR, Kim SH, Nelson G (2015) Camouflage treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with asymmetry using a bone-borne rapid maxillary expander. Angle Orthod. https://doi.org/10.2319/031314-189.1

  6. Carvalho PHA, Moura LB, Trento GS, Holzinger D, Gabrielli MAC, Gabrielli MFR, Pereira Filho VA (2020) Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review of complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.011

  7. Smeets M, Da Costa SO, Eman S, Politis C (2020) A retrospective analysis of the complication rate after SARPE in 111 cases, and its relationship to patient age at surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.12.015

  8. Pereira MD, Koga AF, Prado GPR, Ferreira LM (2018) Complications from surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with HAAS and HYRAX expanders. J Craniofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004079

  9. Angelieri F, Franchi L, Cevidanes LHS, Gonçalves JR, Nieri M, Wolford LM, McNamara JA Jr (2017) Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of midpalatal suture maturation in adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.021

  10. Angelieri F, Cevidanes LH, Franchi L, Gonçalves JR, Benavides E, McNamara JA Jr (2013) Midpalatal suture maturation: classification method for individual assessment before rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.022

  11. Lee KJ, Park YC, Park JY, Hwang WS (2010) Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.065

  12. Carlson C, Sung J, McComb RW, Machado AW, Moon W (2016) Microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance to orthopedically correct transverse maxillary deficiency in an adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.043

  13. Arman Ozcirpici A, Yılmaz A, Polat-Ozsoy O (2014) Maxillary expansion via palatal mini-implants: a preliminary study. Turk J Orthod. https://doi.org/10.13076/TJOD-D-13-00010

  14. Di Palma E, Tepedino M, Chimenti C, Tartaglia GM, Sforza C (2017) Longitudinal effects of rapid maxillary expansion on masticatory muscles activity. J Clin Exp Dent. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53544

  15. Sayar G, Kılınç DD (2019) Rapid maxillary expansion outcomes according to midpalatal suture maturation levels. Prog Orthod. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0278-9

  16. Cantarella D, Dominguez-Mompell R, Mallya SM, Moschik C, Pan HC, Miller J, Moon W (2017) Changes in the midpalatal and pterygopalatine sutures induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with a novel 3D method based on CBCT imaging. Prog Orthod. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0188-7

  17. Capelozza Filho L, Da Silva Filho OG (1997) Rapid maxillary expansion: a general approach and clinical applications. Part I. Dental Press J Orthod 2(3):88–102

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen J (1992) A power prime. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim HM, Park YC, Lee KJ, Kim KH, Choi YJ (2017) Stability of dental, alveolar, and skeletal changes after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion. Korean J Orthod. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.5.313

  20. Lo Giudice A, Quinzi V, Ronsivalle V, Martina S, Bennici O, Isola G (2020) Description of a digital work-flow for CBCT-guided construction of micro-implant supported maxillary skeletal expander. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081815

  21. Lee RJ, Moon W, Hong C (2017) Effects of monocortical and bicortical mini-implant anchorage on bone-borne palatal expansion using finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.025

  22. Lione R, Ballanti F, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Cozza P (2008) Treatment and posttreatment skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion studied with low-dose computed tomography in growing subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.05.011

  23. Zemann W, Schanbacher M, Feichtinger M, Linecker A, Kärcher H (2009) Dentoalveolar changes after surgically assisted maxillary expansion: a three-dimensional evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.044

  24. Park JJ, Park YC, Lee KJ, Cha JY, Tahk JH, Choi YJ (2017) Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.77

  25. Morais JF, Freitas MR, Freitas KM, Janson G, Castello Branco N (2014) Postretention stability after orthodontic closure of maxillary interincisor diastemas. J Appl Oral Sci. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130472

  26. Baratieri C, Alves M Jr, Sant’anna EF, Nojima Mda C, Nojima LI (2011) 3D mandibular positioning after rapid maxillary expansion in Class II malocclusion. Braz Dent J. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402011000500014

  27. Cançado RH, Lauris JR (2014) Error of the method: what is it for? Dental Press J Orthod 19(2):25–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204

  29. Stuart DA, Wiltshire WA (2003) Rapid palatal expansion in the young adult: time for a paradigm shift? J Can Dent Assoc 69(6):374–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi SH, Shi KK, Cha JY, Park YC, Lee KJ (2016) Nonsurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion results in acceptable stability in young adults. Angle Orthod. https://doi.org/10.2319/101415-689.1

  31. Minervino BL, Barriviera M, Curado MD, Gandini LG (2019) MARPE guide: a case report. J Contemp Dent Pract 20(9):1102–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ngan P, Nguyen UK, Nguyen T, Tremont T, Martin C (2018) Skeletal, dentoalveolar, and periodontal changes of skeletally matured patients with maxillary deficiency treated with microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliances: a pilot study. APOS Trends Orthod. https://doi.org/10.4103/apos_27_18

  33. Masthoff M, Gerwing M, Masthoff M, Timme M, Kleinheinz J, Berninger M, Heindel W, Wildgruber M, Schülke C (2019) Dental imaging - a basic guide for the radiologist. Rofo. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0636-4129

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IS: standardizing methodology, intervention, data collection, and interpretation, and writing the manuscript. ESC: blinding, randomization, and clinical follow-up after intervention. AF: formulating the methodology, and clinical intervention. CMF and WC: guidance throughout the study and manuscript editing. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Custodio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Online Resource 1.

Assessment of method error according to Bland-Altman analysis and Dahlberg’s formula. (DOCX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salmoria, I., de Souza, E.C., Furtado, A. et al. Dentoskeletal changes and their correlations after micro-implant-assisted palatal expansion (MARPE) in adults with advanced midpalatal suture ossification. Clin Oral Invest 26, 3021–3031 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04284-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04284-x

Keywords

Navigation