Abstract
A large number of activity-tracking devices have recently dominated the fitness world. These devices typically track different forms of activities and are argued to encourage more active lifestyles. The devices encourage and incentivize change in behavior through mechanisms including personal goals, gratifying representations, and social features. However, both current research and anecdotal evidence about the real impacts of these devices point to mixed outcomes. Many users enjoy positive experiences, while others are reported to have abandoned these devices without generating lasting value for themselves. Through a qualitative study of 29 users of Fitbit activity-tracking devices, we explore how different types of pre-existing motivation shaped people’s perception and adoption of the device. Building from the affordance perspective, our findings suggest that users’ pre-existing motivations, derived from unique life priorities, personal situations, and personalities, may interact with different aspects of the tool, and result in disparate outcomes. Two primary conclusions of this research are (1) the motivational features of activity-tracking devices may only complement already existing motivations of the users but do not create incentive for more physical activities on their own. (2) The value of informational affordances of activity trackers diminishes over time for most users (except the quantified selfers), and without motivational affordances, informational affordances do not sustain long-term use of the device.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam Noah J, Spierer DK, Gu J, Bronner S (2013) Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. J Med Eng Technol 37(7):456–462. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2013.831135
Bajarin T (2015) Here’s why fitness trackers are here to stay. Time.com . Retrieved 15 July, 2016 from http://time.com/3934258/fitness-trackers-fitbit/
Bar-Ilan J, Shalom N, Shoham S, Baruchson-Arbib S, Getz I (2006) The role of information in a lifetime process: a model of weight maintenance by women over long time periods. Inf Res An Int Electron J 11(4):n4
Brawley L, Vallerand R (1984) Enhancing intrinsic motivation for fitness activities: its systematic increase in fitness environment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo
Cheon E, Jarrahi MH, Su NM (2016) “Technology isn’t always the best”: the intersection of health tracking technologies and information practices of digital natives. In The Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics 2016 Chicago
Choe EK (2014) Designing self-monitoring technology to promote data capture and reflection. PhD Dissertation. The Information School, University of Washington
Choe EK, Lee NB, Lee B, Pratt W, Kientz JA (2014) Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372
Clawson J, Pater JA, Miller AD, Mynatt ED, & Mamykina L (2015) No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Consolvo S, Everitt K, Smith I, & Landay JA (2006) Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems
Consolvo S, Klasnja P, McDonald DW, Avrahami D, Froehlich J, LeGrand L, …, Landay JA (2008) Flowers or a robot army? Encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
Consolvo S, McDonald DW, & Landay JA (2009) Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems
Cotgreave A (2015) Why I ditched my Fitbit and what this means for analytics. Jul 27, 2015 Retrieved 29 May, 2016 from http://www.computerworld.com/article/2951751/personal-technology/why-i-ditched-my-fitbit-and-what-this-means-for-analytics.html
Dannecker KL, Sazonova NA, Melanson EL, Sazonov ES, Browning RC (2013) A comparison of energy expenditure estimation of several physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45(11):2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318299d2eb
Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 18(1):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, Peacock J, Ma Y, Goldsmith J, …, Davidson KW (2015) Fitbit®: an accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int J Cardiol 185(140):138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.038
Epstein DA, Caraway M, Johnston C, Ping A, Fogarty J, & Munson SA (2016) Beyond abandonment to next steps: understanding and designing for life after personal informatics tool use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD (2015) Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1
Fausset CB, Mitzner TL, Price CE, Jones BD, Fain BW, & Rogers WA (2013) Older adults’ use of and attitudes toward activity monitoring technologies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ferguson T, Rowlands AV, Olds T, Maher C (2015) The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0201-9
Fritz T, Huang EM, Murphy GC, & Zimmermann T (2014) Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Fulk GD, Combs SA, Danks KA, Nirider CD, Raja B, Reisman DS (2014) Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther 94(2):222–229. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120525
Gibson J (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransfor J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 67–82
Gimpel H, Nißen M, & Görlitz R (2013) Quantifying the quantified self: a study on the motivations of patients to track their own health. In 34th International Conference on Information Systems
Glaser B (1978) Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley
Goode L (2015) Tons of people are buying Fitbits, but are they actually using them?. The Verge. Retrieved 15 May, 2016 from http://www.theverge.com/tech/2015/8/6/9110035/fitbit-fitness-tracker-watch-active-users-sales
Gouveia R, Barros S, & Karapanos E (2014) Understanding users’ disengagement with wearable activity trackers. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference
Gouveia R, Karapanos E, & Hassenzahl M (2015) How do we engage with activity trackers?: a longitudinal study of Habito. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Harrison D, Marshall P, Berthouze N, & Bird J (2014) Tracking physical activity: problems related to running longitudinal studies with commercial devices. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication
Harrison D, Marshall P, Bianchi-Berthouze N, & Bird J (2015) Activity tracking: barriers, workarounds and customisation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Hartson R (2003) Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behav Inform Technol 22(5):315–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001592587
Hermsen S, Frost J, Renes RJ, Kerkhof P (2016) Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior: a critical review of current literature. Comput Hum Behav 57:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.023
Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2):441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
IDC (2015). Fitness trackers in the lead as wearables market grows 3.1% in the third quarter, according to IDC. Retrieved 15 may, 2017 from https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS41996116
Jarrahi MH (2015) Digital and physical materiality of information technologies: the case of fitbit activity tracking devices. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on
Karageorghis C, Terry P (2011) Inside sport psychology. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Kim J (2014) Analysis of health consumers’ behavior using self-tracker for activity, sleep, and diet. Telemed e-Health 20(6):552–558. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0282
Kooiman TJ, Dontje ML, Sprenger SR, Krijnen WP, van der Schans CP, de Groot M (2015) Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 7(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0018-5
Lazar A, Koehler C, Tanenbaum J, & Nguyen DH (2015) Why we use and abandon smart devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Ledger D, & McCaffrey D (2014) Inside wearables how the science of human behavior change. Endeavour Partners. Retrieved 15 May, 2017 from http://endeavourpartners.net/assets/Endeavour-Partners-Inside-Wearables-Part-2-July-2014.pdf
Leonardi PM (2010) Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday, 15(6), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3036
Leonardi PM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: what do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In: Kallinikos J, Leonardi PM, Nardi BA (eds) Materiality and organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.003.0002
Li I, Dey A, & Forlizzi J (2010) A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Li I, Froehlich J, Larsen JE, Grevet C, & Ramirez E (2013) Personal informatics in the wild: hacking habits for health & happiness. CHI'13 Extended Abstracts 3179–3182
Lyons EJ, Lewis ZH, Mayrsohn BG, Rowland JL (2014) Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis. J Med Internet Res 16(8):e192. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3469
Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J Assoc Inf Syst 9(10/11):609
Mcfedries P (2013) Tracking the quantified self. IEEE Spectr 50(8):24
Meyer J, Fortmann J, Wasmann M, & Heuten W (2015) Making lifelogging usable: design guidelines for activity trackers. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling
Montgomery-Downs HE, Insana SP, Bond JA (2012) Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device. Sleep Breath 16(3):913–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-011-0585-y
Motti VG, & Caine K (2014) Human factors considerations in the design of wearable devices. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Munson S (2012) Mindfulness, reflection, and persuasion in personal informatics. Ext. Abstract CHI’12
Munson SA, & Consolvo S (2012) Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. In International conference on Pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (PervasiveHealth)
Mutsuddi AU, & Connelly K (2012) Text messages for encouraging physical activity Are they effective after the novelty effect wears off? In International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth)
Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Barre LK, Bartels SJ (2015) Feasibility of popular m-health technologies for activity tracking among individuals with serious mental illness. Telemed e-Health 21(3):213–216. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0105
Nelson EC, Verhagen T, Noordzij ML (2016) Health empowerment through activity trackers: an empirical smart wristband study. Comput Hum Behav 62:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.065
Nelson SB, Jarrahi MH, Thomson L (2017) Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies. Int J Inf Manag 37(2):54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.008
Orji R, & Moffatt K (2016) Persuasive technology for health and wellness: state-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Informatics J, First Published Online
Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans Inf Syst 12(2):174–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196745
Paton C, Margaret M, Fernandez-Luque L, & Lau AY (2012) Self-tracking, social media and personal health records for patient empowered self-care. Nursing and Health Professions Faculty Research and Publications. Retrieved 16 June, 2017 from http://repository.usfca.edu/nursing_fac/17
Pina LR, Ramirez E, & Griswold WG (2012) Fitbit+: a behavior-based intervention system to reduce sedentary behavior. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth)
Ploderer B, Reitberger W, Oinas-Kukkonen H, van Gemert-Pijnen J (2014) Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Springer, Berlin
Randriambelonoro M, Chen Y, Geissbuhler A, & Pu P (2015) Exploring physical activity monitoring devices for diabetic and obese patients. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
Rapp A, Cena F (2016) Personal informatics for everyday life: how users without prior self-tracking experience engage with personal data. Int J Hum Comput Stud 94:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.006
Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, & Chalmers MC (2014) Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems
Shih PC, Han K, Poole ES, Rosson MB, & Carroll JM (2015) Use and adoption challenges of wearable activity trackers. In the Proceedings of iConference 2015, Newport Beach, CA
Statista (2016) Statista dossier on Fitbit. Retrieved 15 Feb, 2017 from https://www.statista.com/study/30847/fitbit-statista-dossier/
Swan M (2009) Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(2):492–525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6020492
Waltz E (2012) How I quantified myself. IEEE Spectr 49(9):42–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2012.6281132
Wankel LM (1993) The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits from physical activity. Int J Sport Psychol
Wendel S (2013) Designing for behavior change: applying psychology and behavioral economics. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol
Wu Q, Sum K, & Nathan-Roberts D (2016) How fitness trackers facilitate health behavior change. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Yang R, Shin E, Newman MW, & Ackerman MS (2015) When fitness trackers don't'fit': end-user difficulties in the assessment of personal tracking device accuracy. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Zhao Z, Etemad SA, & Arya A (2016) Gamification of exercise and fitness using wearable activity trackers. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Computer Science in Sports (ISCSS)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the study participants for generously sharing their thoughts and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarrahi, M.H., Gafinowitz, N. & Shin, G. Activity trackers, prior motivation, and perceived informational and motivational affordances. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22, 433–448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1099-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1099-9