Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thrust line analysis and the minimum thickness of pointed masonry arches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last few years, scholars have revisited the classical issue of identifying the limit equilibrium states of masonry arches. While the Couplet’s problem was rigorously solved by Serbian scholar Milutin Milankovitch more than a century ago, the minimum thickness of elliptical arches has been recently computed. However, albeit pointed masonry arches are very common in historic structures, particularly in Gothic architecture, their structural behaviour according to thrust line theory is not researched in sufficient detail. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to further develop the geometric formulation, i.e. macroscopic equilibrium analysis of a finite portion of an arch, used for semicircular and semielliptical arches, in order to compute the minimum thickness of pointed arches. Employing radial stereotomy, which concerns generic sections concurrent to the arch’s centre, the present paper derives a closed-form expression of the thrust line of pointed arches under self-weight. The paper concludes that, when the limit equilibrium state is attained, there are four admissible collapse modes with the precise order of the occurrence regarding eccentricity. Considering both incomplete and overcomplete arches, numerical calculations are conducted, resulting in the minimum thickness values of more than hundred arches having various eccentricity. In addition, the limit eccentricity corresponding to the arch having maximum use of its thickness is indicated and particularly treated. Finally, the correlation between eccentricity, embrace angle, and minimum thickness is graphically presented, enabling the clear distinction between the collapse modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aita, D., Barsotti, R., Bennati, S., Foce, F.: The statics of pointed masonry arches between ’limit’ and ’elastic’ analysis. In: Roca, P., Molins, C. (eds.) Arch Bridges IV, Advances in Assessment, Structural Design and Construction, pp. 354–362. CIMNE, Barcelona (2004)

  2. Aita, D., Barsotti, R., Bennati, S.: Equilibrium of pointed, circular, and elliptical masonry arches bearing vertical walls. J. Struct. Eng. 138, 880–888 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, E., Załewski, W.: Form and Forces: Designing Efficient. Expressive Structures. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexakis, H., Makris, N.: Limit equilibrium analysis of masonry arches. Arch. Appl. Mech. 85, 1363–1381 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexakis, H., Makris, N.: Minimum thickness of elliptical masonry arches. Acta Mech. 224, 2977–2991 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Benvenuto, E.: An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics. Springer, New York (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Branner, R.: Villard de Honnecourt, Archimedes, and Chartres. J. Soc. Archit. Hist. 19, 91–96 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Como, M.: Statics of Historic Masonry Constructions. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Cocchetti, G., Colasante, G., Rizzi, E.: On the analysis of minimum thickness in circular masonry arches. Appl. Mech. Rev. 64, 050802 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Couplet, P.: De la poussée des voûtes. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 79–117 and 117–141 (1729, 1730)

  11. Coulomb, C. A.: Essai sur une application des regles des maximis et minimis à quelques problémes de statique relativs a l’arquitecture. In: Mémoires de mathematique et de physique présentés l’acadmie royal des sciences per divers savants et lus dans ses assemblées, vol. 1, pp. 343–382, París (1773)

  12. Cowan, H.J.: Some observations on the structural design of masonry arches and domes before the age of structural mechanics. Archit. Sci. Rev. 24, 98–102 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Culmann, K.: Die graphische Statik. Meyer and Zeller, Zürich (1866)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Curl, J.S.: A Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davies, N., Jokiniemi, E.: Dictionary of Architecture and Building Construction. Architectural Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Rosa, E., Galizia, F.: Evaluation of safety of pointed masonry arches through the static theorem of limit analysis. In: Lourenço, P., Oliveira, D., Portela, A. (eds.) ARCH’07—5th International Conference on Arch Bridges, pp. 659–668 (2007)

  17. Dimitri, R., Tornabene, F.: A parametric investigation of the seismic capacity for masonry arches and portals of different shapes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 52, 1–34 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitchen, J.: The Construction of Gothic Cathedrals. The University of Chicago press, Chicago (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frezier, A. F.: La theorie et la pratique de la coupe des pierres et des bois pour la construction des voutes, vol. 3. Charles-Antoine Jombert, Paris (1739)

  20. Foce, F.: Milankovitch’s Theorie der Druckkurven: Good mechanics for masonry architecture. Nexus Netw. J. 9, 185–210 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gil-Martn, L.M., Hernandez-Montes, E.: Palomares, Pasadas-Fernandez, M.: The optimum shape of an arch under non-symmetric loading conditions. Arch. Appl. Mech. 86, 1509–1520 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregory, D.: Catenaria. Philos. Trans. 19, 637–652 (1697)

  23. Heyman, J.: The stone skeleton. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2, 249–279 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heyman, J.: Coulomb’s Memoir on Statics: An Essay in the History of Civil Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Heyman, J.: The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Hooke, R.: A Description of Helioscopes, and Some Other Instruments. John Martyn Printer to the Royal Society, London (1675)

  27. Huerta, S.: Mechanics of masonry vaults: the equilibrium approach. In: Lourenço, P.B., Roca, P. (eds.) Historical Constructions, pp. 47–69. Guimarães (2001)

  28. Huerta, S.: The analysis of masonry architecture: a historical approach. Archit. Sci. Rev. 51, 297–328 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Körner, C.: Gewölbte Decken. In: Durm, J., Ende, H., Schmitt, E., Wagner, H. (eds.) Handbuch der Architectur, Third part, 2. tome, 3. chapter, pp. 141–553. Verlag von Arnold Bergsträsser, Darmstadt (1895)

  30. Kurrer, K.E.: The History of the Theory of Structures: From Arch Analysis to Computational Mechanics. Ernst & Sohn Verlag, Berlin (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Makris, N., Alexakis, H.: The effect of stereotomy on the shape of the thrust-line and the minimum thickness of semicircular masonry arches. Arch. Appl. Mech. 83, 1511–1533 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Méry, E.: Sur l’équilibre des voûtes en berceau. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées 1, 50–70 (1840)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Milankovitch, M.: Theorie der Druckkurven. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 55, 1–27 (1907)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Moseley, H.: On a new principle in statics, called the principle of least pressure. Lond. Edinb. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 3, 285–288 (1833)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moseley, H.: The Mechanical Principles of Engineering and Architecture. Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London (1843)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Radelet-de, P.G.: The use of a particular form of the parallelogram law of forces for the building of vaults (1650–1750). In: Becchi, A., Corradi, M., Foce, F., Pedemonte, O. (eds.) Essays on the History of Mechanics, pp. 135–163. Springer, Basel, AG (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Romano, A., Ochsendorf, J.A.: The mechanics of gothic masonry arches. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 4, 59–82 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Scheffler, H.: Theorie der Gewölbe. Futtermauern und eisernen Brücken. Verlag der Schulbuchhandlung, Braunschweig (1857)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ungewitter, G.: Lehrbuch der Gotischen Konstruktionen, vol. 1. T. O. Weigel Nachfolger, Leipzig (1890)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ware, S.: A Treatise of the Properties of Arches, and Their Abutment Piers. Longman, Hurst, Rees and Orme, London (1809)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Young, T.: Bridge. Supplement to the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 2, pp. 497–520. Archibald Constable, Edinburgh (1824)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia

    Dimitrije Nikolić

Authors
  1. Dimitrije Nikolić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrije Nikolić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolić, D. Thrust line analysis and the minimum thickness of pointed masonry arches. Acta Mech 228, 2219–2236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-1823-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-1823-6

Search

Navigation