Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A 7-year follow-up retrospective, international, multicenter study of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the long-term glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes, using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for at least 5 years in three diabetes centers from three different countries: Canada, Italy and Spain. This was an observational retrospective multicenter cohort study. Subjects were included if they were followed at one of the participating centers, had type 1 diabetes, age 5–20 years at time of data collection and used CSII for more than 5 years. Data collected included gender, age, disease duration, age at CSII initiation, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), insulin requirement and serious adverse events (SAE) at baseline and every 12 months during follow-up. One hundred fifteen patients were included in the study (55 % males), aged 5–20 years (mean: 13.5 ± 3.8 years), with mean diabetes duration of 6.3 ± 3.4 years, using CSII for mean of 6.9 ± 1.2 years (range 5–12 years.). HbA1c significantly improved after 1 year of CSII treatment and during follow-up (p = 0.02). When HbA1c was compared between countries, a difference was observed, with slightly lower values in Italy than in Canada and Spain (p = 0.04). When evaluated by gender, HbA1c was similar at baseline, but significantly improved only in males during all follow-up (p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed for BMI, insulin requirement or SAE. Insulin pump therapy is safe and effective in the pediatric population, although in this study, the major benefit in HbA1c was seen in males. The use of advanced pump features was associated with greater improvement in HbA1c.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Diabetes Control Complication Trial (DCCT) Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 329:977–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 352:837–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group (2005) Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 353:2643–2652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Monami M, Lamanna C, Marchionni N, Mannucci E (2010) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol 47(Suppl 1):77–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Misso ML, Egberts KJ, Page M, O’Connor D, Shaw J (2010) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(1):CD005103

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weinzimer SA, Ternand C, Howard C, Chang CT, Becker DJ, Laffel LM, Insulin Aspart Pediatric Pump Study Group (2008) A randomized trial comparing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion of insulin aspart versus insulin lispro in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 31:210–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahern JA, Boland EA, Doane R, Ahern JJ, Rose P, Vincent M, Tamborlane WV (2002) Insulin pump therapy in pediatrics: a safe alternative to safely lower HbA1c levels across all age groups. Pediatr Diabetes 3:10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 157:336–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sulli N, Shashaj B (2006) Long-term benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with Type 1 diabetes: a 4-year follow-up. Diabet Med 23:900–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scrimgeour L, Cobry E, McFann BS, Burdick P, Weimer C, Slover R, Chase HP (2007) Improved glycemic control after long-term insulin pump use in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 9:421–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shalitin S, Gil M, Nimri R, de Vries L, Gavan MY, Phillip M (2010) Predictors of glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes commencing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy. Diabet Med 27:339–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes CR, McDowell N, Cody D, Costigan C (2012) Sustained benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Arch Dis Child 97:245–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Batajoo RJ, Messina CR, Wilson TA (2012) Long-term efficacy of insulin pump therapy in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 4:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinzimer SA, Ahern JH, Doyle EA, Vincent MR, Dziura J, Steffen AT, Tamborlane WV (2004) Persistence of benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in very young children with type 1 diabetes: a follow-up study. Pediatrics 114:1601–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh J, Roberts R, Bailey T (2011) Guidelines for optimal bolus calculator settings in adults. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:129–135

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connell MA, Donath S, Cameron FJ (2011) Poor adherence to integral daily tasks limits the efficacy of CSII in youth. Pediatr Diabetes 12:556–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cukierman-Yaffe T, Konvalina N, Cohen O (2011) Key elements for successful intensive insulin pump therapy in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 92:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scaramuzza AE, Iafusco D, Santoro L, Bosetti A, De Palma A, Spiri D, Mameli C, Zuccotti GV (2010) Timing of bolus in children with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (TiBoDi Study). Diabetes Technol Ther 12:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luijf YM, van Bon AC, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH (2010) Premeal injection of rapid-acting insulin reduces postprandial glycemic excursions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 33:2152–2155

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Palma A, Giani E, Iafusco D, Bosetti A, Macedoni M, Gazzarri A, Spiri D, Scaramuzza AE, Zuccotti GV (2011) Lowering postprandial glycemia in children with type 1 diabetes after Italian pizza ‘margherita’ (TyBoDi2 Study). Diabetes Technol Therap 13:483–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cherubini V, Gesuita R, Bonfanti R, Franzese A, Frongia AP, Iafusco D, Iannilli A, Lombardo F, Rabbone I, Sabbion A, Salvatoni A, Scaramuzza A, Schiaffini R, Sulli N, Toni S, Tumini S, Mosca A, Carle F; VIPKIDS Study Group. (2013) Health-related quality of life and treatment preferences in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The VIPKIDS study. Acta Diabetol [Epub ahead of print]

  22. Maniatis AK, Toig SR, Kingensmith GJ, Fay-Itzkowitz E, Chase HP (2001) Life with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy: child and parental perspectives and predictors of metabolic control. Pediatr Diabetes 2:51–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahern JA, Boland EA, Doane R, Ahern JJ, Vincent M, Tamborlane WV (2002) Insulin pump therapy in pediatrics: a therapeutic alternative to safely lower HbA1c levels across all age groups. Pediatr Diabetes 3:10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Plotnick LP, Clark LM, Brancati F, Erlinger T (2003) Diabetes Care 26:1142–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Willi SM, Planton J, Egede L, Schwarz S (2003) Benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 143:796–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. De Wit M, Snoek FJ (2011) Depressive symptoms and unmet psychological needs of Dutch youth with type 1 diabetes: results of a web-survey. Pediatr Diabetes 12(3 pt 1):172–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Vries L, Grushka Y, Lebenthal Y, Shalitin S, Phillip M (2011) Factors associated with increased risk of insulin pump discontinuation in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 12(5):506–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

A.E.S receives research support, and participates in advisory boards for Medtronic, no conflict of interest disclosed for this study; C.M., J.H., R.C.-H., L.S.-O., and G.V.Z. have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea E. Scaramuzza.

Additional information

Communicated by Guido Pozza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mameli, C., Scaramuzza, A.E., Ho, J. et al. A 7-year follow-up retrospective, international, multicenter study of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 51, 205–210 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-013-0481-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-013-0481-y

Keywords

Navigation