Abstract
Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal community of the European chestnut has been poorly investigated, and mostly by sporocarp sampling. We proposed the study of the ECM fungal community of 2-year-old chestnut hybrids Castanea × coudercii (Castanea sativa × Castanea crenata) using molecular approaches. By using the chestnut hybrid clones 111 and 125, we assessed the impact of grafting on ECM colonization rate, species diversity, and fungal community composition. The clone type did not have an impact on the studied variables; however, grafting significantly influenced ECM colonization rate in clone 111. Species diversity and richness did not vary between the experimental groups. Grafted and ungrafted plants of clone 111 had a different ECM fungal species composition. Sequence data from ITS regions of rDNA revealed the presence of 9 orders, 15 families, 19 genera, and 27 species of ECM fungi, most of them generalist, early-stage species. Thirteen new taxa were described in association with chestnuts. The basidiomycetes Agaricales (13 taxa) and Boletales (11 taxa) represented 36% and 31%, of the total sampled ECM fungal taxa, respectively. Scleroderma citrinum, S. areolatum, and S. polyrhizum (Boletales) were found in 86% of the trees and represented 39% of total ECM root tips. The ascomycete Cenococcum geophilum (Mytilinidiales) was found in 80% of the trees but accounted only for 6% of the colonized root tips. These results could help to unveil the impact of grafting on fungal symbionts, improving management of chestnut agro-ecosystems and production of edible fungal species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The chestnuts are deciduous trees and shrubs belonging to the genus Castanea Mill. (Fagaceae), a small taxon which includes 13 species. Native from temperate countries of the Northern Hemisphere, the chestnut is widely distributed in southern Europe, eastern North America, northern Africa, Asia Minor, and eastern Asia (Conedera et al. 2016). Four species are mainly used for commercial production (Hardin et al. 2001): C. sativa Mill. (European chestnut), C. crenata Sieb. and Zucc. (Japanese chestnut), C. mollissima Bl. (Chinese chestnut), and C. dentata (Marsh.) Borkh. (American chestnut).
Chestnut cultivation was initially developed by the ancient Greeks, and successively propagated in the rest of Europe by the Romans as a crop, by grafting (Conedera et al. 2004). Thus, C. sativa, the only native species of the European continent, covering more than 2.5 million hectares, is mainly distributed among France, Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal, and Switzerland (Conedera et al. 2016; Roces-Díaz et al. 2018).
Chestnut forest stands and orchards are part of the traditional and historical landscape and are amongst the conservation priorities in Europe (European Council 1992). Chestnut orchards have a notable multipurpose character, producing not only timber, firewood, forage, and tasty edible fruits but also secondary products such as pasture, hay, mushrooms, and honey (Pereira-Lorenzo et al. 2010). In Spain, chestnut orchards occupy 272,400 ha, being the dominant species in 154,500 ha (MAPAMA 2013). Galicia (NW Spain) is the main producing area in the country, followed by Castilla-León (El Bierzo), Central Spain (Salamanca, Cáceres, and Ávila), Andalucía, and Canary Islands (Tenerife, La Palma, Gomera, and El Hierro).
In Galicia, both forest stands and cultivated orchards cover a total surface area of 45,518 ha (Xunta de Galicia 2001). Although chestnut groves are rarely intercropped or grazed, such groves create a mosaic of land uses including orchard, coppice, and forests. Great part of the adult chestnut areas belongs to the Natura 2000 network, being an important site for birds, and also included in the recovery plan for bear populations in Galicia. Also, the chestnuts produced in this region are recognized as protected geographical indication (PGI) and are exported to selective markets in Europe (Fernández-López 2013).
At the end of the 19th century, native C. sativa was dramatically threatened by the spread of ink disease, caused by Phytophthora cambivora and P. cinnamomi, and more recently by the chestnut blight, caused by Cryphonectria parasitica (Bouhier 1979; Mansilla Vázquez et al. 2000; Miranda-Fontaiña et al. 2007). Castanea sativa was traditionally the main species in Spain´s chestnut orchards, but in Galicia since the 1950s, interspecific hybrids, such as Castanea × coudercii (Castanea sativa × Castanea crenata), have been used as rootstock for grafting C. sativa plants (Fernández-López 2011). In addition, hybrids of C. sativa with C. crenata and C. mollisima offered tolerance and/or resistance to ink diseases, allowing to overcome the infection (Miranda-Fontaiña et al. 2007; Fernández-López 2011). The selection of chestnut hybrids which are resistant to blight or ink diseases, and the necessity of propagating them asexually, led to an important commercial production of selected hybrid clones.
The vegetative propagation used for woody plants are grafting (sometimes by budding), cuttings from stems and roots, layering, and micro-propagation (Macdonald 1990). However, grafting has proven to be a more successful and feasible method for asexual propagation (Huang et al. 1994). Today, chestnut orchards for fruit production consist of open stands, generally composed of grafted trees because of the self-sterility of some chestnut cultivars. It is accomplished most commonly by connecting two plant segments, the shoot piece called “scion” and the root piece called “rootstock,” generally selected for disease resistance. It has been discovered from experiments that grafting influences absorption and translocation of phosphorus, nitrogen, magnesium, and calcium (Ikeda et al. 1986; Ruiz-Medrano et al. 1999; Pulgar et al. 2000), improves nutrient uptake and increases photosynthesis (Hu et al. 2006). Repeated grafting improved the in vitro culture capacity of a recalcitrant mature chestnut tree, indicating that reinvigoration increases rooting capacity (Giovannelli and Giannini 2000; Fernández-Lorenzo and Fernández-López 2005; Fernández-Lorenzo and Crecente 2010). Here, we hypothesize that grafted chestnuts may experience a better performance, which could be translated into an increase of ECM fungal species richness and colonization rate, through a higher allocation of carbohydrates to the fungal symbionts.
Naturally, C. sativa trees establish ectomycorrhizal (ECM) associations with a large macro-fungal community, usually dominated by the families Amanitaceae, Boletaceae, and Cortinariaceae, being the genera Amanita, Cortinarius, Inocybe, Lactarius, Russula, and Tricholoma, the most abundant taxa above-ground, in terms of species number (Baptista et al. 2010; Martins et al. 2011; Álvarez-La Fuente 2015; Baptista et al. 2015). Positive effect of the host plant-fungus symbiosis, such as an increased phosphorus and nitrogen uptake, increased growth (Martins et al. 1996; Martins et al. 1997) and better protection against root pathogens have been assessed (Branzanti et al. 1999). However, during a long time, chestnut orchard planning and management has paid little attention to the ECM fungal diversity and to the harvesting of wild edible fungi. Recently, because of a decline in forest-based industries in some countries, the collection and commercialization of marketable edible mushrooms represent an important income associated with chestnut orchards (Román and Boa 2006). In particular, macro-fungal species such as Amanita cesarea (Scop.) Pers., Cantharellus cibarius Fr., Boletus fragans, and Boletus edulis complex (B. edulis Bull.: Fr. sensu stricto; B. aereus Bull.: Fr.; B. pinophilus Pilat et Dermek; and B. reticulatus Schaeff), are especially appreciated (Leonardi et al. 2005). Despite the ecological and economic importance of the fungal assemblage associated with C. sativa, literature on this topic is still scarce.
The ECM fungal community associated with chestnut orchards has been investigated, mostly by fruit bodies identification, in some European countries such as Italy (Laganà et al. 2002; Peintner et al. 2007; Blom et al. 2009; Ambrosio and Zotti 2015), Greece (Diamandis and Perlerou 2001; Polemis et al. 2011), Portugal (Baptista et al. 2010; Martins et al. 2011; Baptista et al. 2015; Reis et al. 2016), Romania (Chira and Chira 2003), and Spain (Álvarez-La Fuente 2015). Although above-ground surveys of epigeous fungal species provide valuable information on the reproductive investment of co-occurring species, they only partially reflect fungal diversity and represent a distorted view of the distribution of soil mycelia (Gardes and Bruns 1996; Straatsma et al. 2001). Studies performed in chestnut orchards have revealed little overlap between above- and below-ground fungal communities by using fruit body surveys and internal transcriber spacer (ITS) barcoding of ECM root tips (Peintner et al. 2007; Baptista et al. 2015).
Here, we proposed for the first time (1) the study of the ECM fungal community of young chestnut hybrid Castanea × coudercii saplings in NW Spain, by using a below-ground molecular approach, and (2) the evaluation of the impact of chestnut hybrid clone type and grafting on ECM colonization rate, fungal community composition, importance value (sum of relative frequency and relative abundance), richness, and diversity.
Material and methods
Study area and orchard characteristics
The study was conducted in Galicia, which is the most important forestry region of Spain (MAPAMA 2013). It is characterized by an Atlantic humid climate without long frost periods and with a uniformly distributed annual precipitation (Martínez Cortizas and Pérez Alberti 2000). The average annual temperature varies between 8 and 14 °C. Annual rainfall ranges from 600 to 2500 mm, with some sites over 3000 mm per year. The experimental orchard is located at Bora, Pontevedra province (42° 25′ 56.5″ N–8° 34′ 41″ W) and belongs to Hifas Foresta company. This is a 3-year-old, productive orchard, irrigated 4/5 times per year and fertilized with Ficosagro, a liquid bio-stimulant. This product is rich in microorganisms (Agarophytae algae, sulfate-reducing bacteria, aerobic mesophilic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, yeast, and molds) and improves the recovery of soil microflora and microfauna, and helps to release soil nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus that can be absorbed by the roots of the plants. The experimental site is surrounded by pastures, fruit orchards, mature chestnuts, and oak trees (Quercus robur).
Soil characterization
In Galicia, soils are typically acidic and sandy; they contain a high proportion of coarse fragments and have a high content of organic matter and low levels of nutrients. Granite, schist, and slate are the dominant parent materials, leading to ranker-like soils, litosols, or humid cambisols (Macías and Calvo de Anta 2008). The studied area is characterized by soils with a predominance of the sand fraction and little amount of clay, high porosity, and low water retention capacity. Soil sampling was carried out in October 2018, to assess the main chemical characters of the studied orchard. In the orchard, twelve soil samples 5 × 5 cm were taken in the first horizon (0–5 cm deep) with a soil corer, and another twelve soil samples at 20 cm deep. Soil analysis (pH, organic matter (%), organic C, available soil N, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and Ca, K, Mg, Na, Al) was carried out at the Plant Biology and Soil Sciences Department of the University of Vigo and is summarized in the Electronic Supplementary Material S1.
Experimental design and root sample collection
Young (2-year-old) chestnut clones, named 111 and 125, of the hybrid Castanea × coudercii from Hifas Foresta germplasm, were used as plant material. One half of the chestnut clone 111 was grafted with Bouche de Bétizac cultivar, which is a French controlled hybrid between C. sativa and C. crenata, mostly appreciated for its large fruits. Similarly, one half of the chestnut clone 125 was also grafted with the C. sativa cultivar “Judía” which is the main cultivar in north-western Trás-os-Montes, and quite popular in Portugal for its fruit yield (Dinis et al. 2009). The other halves of both chestnut clones were kept ungrafted.
In the orchard, mother plants were induced to produce clones by layering. The clones were cultivated during the winter and successively grafted in spring 2017. The rootstocks obtained were grafted following the English double protocol (i.e., whip and tongue graft of scion and rootstock, with large contact between both cambial surfaces). Grafted and ungrafted plants were 30 cm apart along the same row. The rows were 50 cm apart. A total of 16 saplings of chestnut clone 111 grafted (n = 8) and ungrafted (n = 8) and another 16 saplings of the chestnut clone 125 grafted (n = 8) and ungrafted (n = 8) were sampled for fungal root tip analysis. Root samples were collected during January–February 2018. The below-ground fungal community of the experimental orchard was studied following the procedure of Pestaña-Nieto and Santolamazza-Carbone (2009). Approximately 50 cm of fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) per tree were collected. Fine roots were cut with scissors, introduced in labelled plastic bags and transported to the laboratory, where they were stored at 4 °C until processing. Following Agerer (1987–2002), all ECM root tips were sorted into broadly defined morphotypes based on morphological characteristics, including color, shape, texture, ramification type, occurrence of cystidia, mantle type, emanating hyphae and rhizomorphs. Care was taken to separate morphotypes when slight variations were found. Finally, for each tree, subsamples of the morphotypes (depending on its abundance, it ranged from 10 to 100 mg) were placed individually in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and stored at − 20 °C for molecular analysis, in order to provide taxonomic identification.
Ecological parameters
Fifty pieces (approximately 1 cm) of roots were examined per tree. The fragments were randomly dispersed in a 9-cm-diameter Petri dish with grid lines in order to calculate the ECM colonization rate (proportion of ECM root tips/total root tips of 50 cm of root length) by using the gridline intersect method under a dissecting microscope (Brundrett et al. 1996). Once obtained the taxonomic identity of the ECM root tips, after molecular verification, ECM fungal community composition was assessed through the estimation of the relative abundance per plant (root tips produced by each taxon/ECM root tips of 50 cm of root length), the absolute frequency (no. of plants with a taxon/total sampled plants), and the relative frequency (absolute frequency of a taxon/Ʃ absolute frequency of all taxa) of each fungal species per host plant, were calculated. In addition, following Brundrett et al. (1996), we used the sum of relative frequency and relative abundance to obtain the importance value of each taxon in the ECM fungal community. Species richness was defined as the number of ECM species recorded per plant. Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H’) was used to characterize the composition of the ECM fungal communities across the experimental groups, by using the software EstimateS 9.1.0 (Colwell 2006). The Shannon–Wiener index increases when the number of taxa increases or the distribution of the species becomes more even.
Molecular analysis
The taxonomic identity of the morphotypes was ascertained by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of the ITS regions (Horton and Bruns 2001). The samples were amplified by using the direct PCR procedure (Iotti and Zambonelli 2006). This procedure, which is faster and less expensive than conventional methods, allows to amplify ITS fragments directly from the root tips, without performing the previous DNA extraction and purification. ECM root tips manipulation was carried out in Petri dishes containing sterile distilled water under a dissecting microscope (× 20). A small portion of the ECM mantle was peeled with a sterilized surgical blade and directly transferred to the PCR tube containing pure sterilized water and BSA. For this method, the PCR reaction protocol was as follows: 95 °C for 6 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 10 min. However, direct PCR may not always provide a good amplification of dark pigmented ECM root tips or with recalcitrant DNA. In these cases, fungal DNA was extracted from fresh ECM root tips using the EZNA Fungal DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, USA). The eluted DNA was successively purified with the Power Clean Pro DNA Clean up Kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCRs were conducted in 30 µl volume reaction containing MgCl2 50 mM (BIORAD), DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Scientific), bovine serum albumin (BSA) 10× (Thermo Scientific), pure water nuclease-free (Thermo Scientific), and 2 µl of undiluted DNA (concentration ranged between 50 and 100 ng/µl). The universal primers ITS1/ITS4 and ITS1F/ ITS4B were used to amplify the ITS-1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions of the nuclear rDNA. The amplification conditions were optimized for each primer combination, but the general reaction protocol was as follows: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. A sample of 3 µl of each PCR reaction was electrophoresed in a 2% agarose gel and visualized with the UV-transilluminator. Negative controls without DNA were performed, in order to detect possible contaminations.
PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Laboratories (http://www.macrogen.com). Forward and reverse sequences were aligned and edited using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.2.6 (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html). All sequences were identified to genus or species level by querying the GenBank database, using the nucleotide-nucleotide (blastn) BLAST search option, available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). We considered only sequences with 80–100% of query coverage and E value (expectation value) equal to zero. Assignment to taxonomic categories was performed by using the following criterion: sequences with similarity between 90 and 97% were identified to genus groups, while sequence similarity ≥ 98% gives a match for species identification.
The nomenclature of fungal taxa and the geographical distribution of these species have been assessed by using the Index Fungorum (www.indexfungorum.org) and the global mapper provided by the online encyclopedia of life www.discoverlife.org and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility web (www.gbif.org), respectively.
Statistical analysis
Prior the analyses, variables using continuous data were checked for normality by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variances. Variables using binomial data (such as ratios expressed in percentage) were previously subjected to logarithm (x + 1) transformation.
The impact of chestnut clone and grafting on ECM colonization rate and fungal species richness were investigated by two-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons were done with LSD (least significant difference) Fisher’s test at level of significance α = 0.05. The analyses were performed with GenStat release 10.2 (VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK).
To estimate the species accumulation curve index (S), we used Chao2 estimators. Species accumulation curves with 95% confidence intervals and 100 permutations were computed to assess the efficiency of ECM sampling for each experimental group and were performed with EstimateS 9.1.0 (Colwell 2006).
To test for differences in ECM fungal species composition and to estimate the components of variation, we used the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), with the number of root tips of each ECM taxon as the variables. The plant clone identity and the grafting were used as fixed factors. PERMANOVA analyses were based on Bray–Curtis similarities. We used PRIMER 7.0.13 with the PERMANOVA + 1 add for these analyses. The analysis was performed using 9999 permutations, with permutation of residuals under a reduced model, fixed effects sum set to zero and type III sums of squares. Significance was declared at α = 0.05.
Results
A total of 25,296 chestnut hybrid root tips were examined under the dissecting microscope, of which 3,784 were ECM root tips, initially sorted among 382 morphotypes. The 48% of the samples were successfully amplified with the direct PCR technique.
The chestnut hybrid clone type (111 vs. 125) did not have any impact on ECM colonization rate (F1,31 = 2.03, P = 0.165) (Fig. 1a). When data from both clones were pooled, ECM colonization was greater in grafted than in ungrafted saplings (F1,31 = 12.75, P = 0.001) (Fig. 1b). With chestnut clone 111, grafted plants had a higher ECM colonization rate than the ungrafted ones (F1,31 = 29.20, P < 0.001), whereas such difference was not found in the chestnut clone 125 (F1,31 = 0.04, P = 0.845) (Fig. 1c). On the other hand, among ungrafted plants, the chestnut clone 125 had a higher ECM colonization rate than clone 111 (F1,15 = 12.20, P = 0.004) (Fig. 1c). ECM colonization rate, however, did not vary between the grafted clones 111 and 125 (F1,15 = 3.46, P = 0.084). Neither clone type (F1,31 = 0.21, P = 0.654) nor grafting (F1,31 = 0.57, P = 0.457), influenced ECM species richness. Similarly, species richness did not vary within clone 111 (F1,31 = 2.34, P = 0.150) and clone 125 (F1,31 = 0.25, P = 0.626) when comparing grafted and ungrafted plants, and also between the grafted clones 111 and 125 (F1,15 = 0.07, P = 0.792).
Anatomical features and sequence data from ITS regions of rDNA revealed the presence of 9 orders, 15 families, 19 genera, and 27 species of ECM fungi (Table 1). Among the identified ECM fungal taxa, 13 were not previously reported in association with chestnuts (Table 1). Moreover, Hebeloma arenosum, Hymenogaster huthii, Laccaria montana, and Xerocomellus ripariellus have been identified for the first time in Spain. In addition, Hortiboletus rubellus, Inocybe curvipes, I. soluta, Laccaria macrocystidiata, L. proxima, Sphaerosporella brunnea, Xerocomus pruinatus, and X. rubellus have been detected for the first time in Galicia.
All the ECM fungal taxa were basidiomycetes (Agaricales, Boletales, Cantharellales, Russulales, Sebacinales, Thelephorales, and Trechisporales), with the exception of Cenococcum geophilum (Mytilinidiales) and Sphaerosporella brunnea (Pezizales), both ascomycetes (Table 1). The order groups with the highest species richness were Agaricales (13 taxa) and Boletales (11 taxa), which represented 36% and 31%, of total sampled ECM fungal taxa, respectively. Root tips colonized by Agaricales represented only 10% of the 3784 sampled ECM root tips, whereas Boletales were detected in 48% of the ECM root tips. C. geophilum was found in 80% of the experimental trees but Mytilinidiales accounted only for 6% of colonized root tips.
Scleroderma spp. (S. areolatum, S. citrinum, and S. polyrhizum) were found in 86% of the sampled trees and represented 39% of sampled ECM root tips. Percentages of relative abundance calculated for each fungal order inside each experimental group are shown in Fig. 2a–d. For the grafted chestnut clone 111, Boletales (33.08%) and Agaricales (30.49%) dominate the fungal community, whereas Agaricales (45.76%) and Thelephorales (27.12%) are the most abundant orders for the ungrafted clone 111 (Fig 2a, b). A similar trend was found for the grafted chestnut clone 125, where Agaricales (47.19%) and Boletales (20.48%) are the most abundant taxa inside the fungal community (Fig. 2c). For the ungrafted chestnut clone 125, Boletales had the highest abundance (51.06%), followed by Thelephorales (18.72%) (Fig. 2d)
The ranking of importance values of the identified ECM fungal taxa is shown in Fig. 3a–d. Scleroderma spp. appeared in the first position of the importance value ranking of three out of the four experimental treatments, followed by C. geophilum and Laccaria spp. The ECM fungal community associated with the ungrafted clone 111 (Fig. 3b), was characterized by a group of 6–7 taxa with similar importance value, being impossible to indicate a really dominant taxon, as it occurred in the other experimental groups.
Although, ECM fungal species (73%) dominated the below-ground fungal community (19 genera, and 27 species), also non-ECM fungi (ericoid, saprotrophic, and wood decay fungi) were detected, representing 27% (12 genera and 9 species) of identified taxa (Electronic Supplementary Material S3). Non-ECM fungi, however, were excluded from further analyses.
Rarefaction curves for ECM root tip surveys did not reach a plateau (Electronic Supplementary Material S2). The ratio between the observed and the estimated ECM species richness (using the Chao2 estimators) ranged between 25 and 80%, with the lower ratios corresponding to ungrafted clone 125, which suggest some under-sampling (Electronic Supplementary Material S2).
Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H’) did not vary among chestnut clone types (F1,31 = 0.00, P = 0.945), and between grafted and ungrafted plants (F1,31 = 0.54, P = 0.469). The similarity of ECM fungal composition was significantly affected by the host plant clone identity but not by grafting (PERMANOVA analysis; Table 2). There were differences in fungal composition between clone 111 and 125 (up to eleven ECM fungal species were found exclusively in clone 111 and 5 in clone 125) and within clone 111 between grafted and ungrafted plants, although this effect was not detected within clone 125 (Table 2). In addition, 6 ECM fungal species (Hortiboletus rubellus, Hymenogaster huthii, Astraeus hygrometricus, Sphaerosporella brunnea, Laccaria proxima, and Inocybe solute) were found exclusively in the grafted chestnut clone 111, whereas only 2–3 exclusive ECM fungal species were recorded in the other treatment groups (Fig. 3a–d).
Discussion
Grafting is an ancient procedure commonly used to improve growth, yield, and resistance to diseases of woody trees such as chestnut (Giovannelli and Giannini 2000; Fernández-Lorenzo and Fernández-López 2005; Fernández-Lorenzo and Crecente 2010). Many attempts to provide a satisfactory explanation of short- and long-term consequences of grafting have been made, but, at present, many physical, physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of this practice are still unclear (Goldschmidt 2014; Belmonte-Ureña et al. 2019). As far as we know, this is the first time that the relationship between grafting and ECM fungal community structure is investigated. We hypothesized that grafted plants should experience a higher ECM colonization rate, but actually this effect was found only in the chestnut clone 111 grafted with the Bouche de Bétizac cultivar, mostly determined by Scleroderma areolatum (Boletales), Inocybe curvipes (Agaricales), Tomentella sp. (Thelephorales), and Cenococcum geophilum (Mytilinidiales). Similarly, importance value indicates a dominance of S. areolatum, C. geophilum, and Tomentella sp. for this experimental group. Thus, the chestnut clone 111 seems to be more responsive to grafting in comparison with clone 125, because the higher association with ECM fungi, and because ungrafted plants of clone 125 showed the lowest colonization rate. Clone 111 thus appears as a promising type which may ensure, under favorable soil conditions, a better performance and development of the plant. On the other hand, grafted plants of clone 125 did not increase their alliance with ECM fungi, showing a similar ECM colonization rate than ungrafted plants or grafted plants of clone 111. Possibly, the increase of the colonization rate by the fungal partners, which in turn allows a higher water and nutrient uptake, may depend on a better performance of the plant, promoted by grafting. Of course, at present, this is just speculative and further studies are needed to unveil the role of grafting on fungal symbionts dynamics and plant development. About ECM fungal richness and diversity, however, we did not find significant differences between groups, possibly due to the young age of the chestnut clones, being our first hypothesis not supported. Despite the fungal communities of the experimental groups were dominated by generalist species, and despite richness and diversity did not vary, significant differences in ECM fungal species composition were found between clones 111 and 125, and within the clone 111. Then, the grafted clone 111 had not only a higher fungal colonization rate, in comparison with ungrafted plants, but also harbored a significantly different ECM fungal community. In particular, there is a shift of the dominant fungal order within clone 111: Boletales members are preponderant among grafted plants (33%), whereas Agaricales dominate the ECM fungal community of ungrafted ones (46%). Fungal species with thick mantles, extensive extra-matrical mycelia or rhizomorphs, and large and abundant sporocarps (high-biomass species) have a larger carbon requirement and may impose a greater cost on the plant host (Saikkonen et al. 1999). Under the hypothesis of an increased photosynthetic performance of the scion leaves in response to grafting (Fullana-Pericás et al. 2019), the presence of high-biomass fungal species, such as the Boletales Scleroderma, Hortiboletus and Xerocomus, could be explained. On the other hand, among the ungrafted plants, which may be not able to support expensive fungal symbionts due to lower carbon allocation, low-biomass fungi of the Agaricales order, such as Laccaria, Inocybe, and Hebeloma are more abundant.
To our knowledge, this is the first report on the mycobiota associated with 2-year-old Castanea × coudercii hybrids using molecular approaches. Among the identified fungal taxa, there are 13 species that have not been previously documented in symbiosis with chestnuts. This finding supports the evidence that molecular identification of ECM fungal root tips provides better information about fungal diversity than above-ground sporocarp surveys only (Gardes and Bruns 1996). Species producing hypogeous sporocarps such as Hymenogaster huthii would have never been detected by above-ground sporocarp sampling. The genus Hymenogaster is the most species-rich genus of false truffles and includes a number of rarely recorded taxa, for which molecular study are necessary (Stielow et al. 2011). Also, the ascomycete C. geophilum, a ubiquitous, generalist ECM fungus, can only be detected on root tips or as sclerotia into the soil (Trappe 1964; Douhan and Rizzo 2004). Other species such as Thelephora sp. and Tomentella sp., well represented in all the experimental chestnut clones, are easily missed in above-ground sporocarp surveys, due to their resupinate fruitbodies (Gardes and Bruns 1996). Both genera are often found in plant nursery soil and are considered as important ECM mycobionts of seedlings, especially after planting on former agricultural land (Hilszczańska and Sierota 2006).
A Sebacina sp. was found in symbiosis with the ungrafted chestnut clone 111 only, being in the second position in the ranked importance value for the ECM fungal community (Fig. 3b). Fungi in the Sebacinales order display transitions from saprotrophy to endophytism and to mycorrhizal life styles. Sebacina is another example of a previously overlooked and now ubiquitous root symbiont (Kühdorf et al. 2014). The same is true for the species of the ascomycetous genus Meliniomyces, which was listed here among the non ECM species (Table S1). Meliniomyces sp. have been previously detected with molecular tools in roots of conifers such as Pinus pinaster (Pestaña Nieto and Santolamazza-Carbone 2009), and Picea abies (Vohník et al. 2007), but also in Castanea sativa (Reis et al. 2016). It remains to be shown whether Meliniomyces sp. can form true ectomycorrhizae (Hambleton 2005). In the present study, we detected only one species, Sphaerosporella brunnea, of the Pezizales order, present on 0.1% of the total sampled ECM root tips. This fungus is a pioneer and opportunist ECM species, often present in nurseries (Sánchez et al. 2014).
Fungal species composition tends to change as stands mature, and older trees tend to support a greater number of fungal symbionts than younger trees (Nara et al. 2003; Twieg et al. 2007). In Portugal, 46 ECM species were reported on root tips of mature C. sativa stands (Baptista et al. 2010) and 39 ECM genera in 100-year-old chestnut orchard (Reis et al. 2016). In Italy, 38 (Peintner et al. 2007) and 52 ECM fungal species (Blom et al. 2009) were identified from C. sativa root tips. In addition, the investigation developed in central Spain on ECM fungal diversity of C. sativa, based on both sporocarp collection and root tips, found 115 ECM fungal species sorted among 30 genera (Álvarez-Lafuente 2015). In the present study, we found 19 genera and 27 ECM fungal species associated with the young chestnut hybrids, which confirm that young plants have a reduced community of fungal symbionts, although the rarefaction curves suggest that we underestimated species diversity.
The concept “succession,” generally applied to patterns of community development that exhibited replacement of species over time (Chapin III et al. 2002), has been used to describe the below-ground changes of ECM fungal community (Mason et al. 1983; Visser 1995). Fungal taxa may be categorized as “early-stage,” “multi-stage” (occurring in all stages), and “late-stage” depending on the host plant age (Twieg et al. 2007). Here, the ECM fungal community associated with the young chestnuts saplings was dominated by Scleroderma spp., C. geophilum, and Laccaria spp. for which the highest importance values were found (Fig. 3a–d). Scleroderma species are commonly used for inoculation practice in greenhouse nurseries to improve plant performance (Ortega et al. 2004), as well as Laccaria spp. (Sinclair et al. 1982), and both are generally considered early-stage fungi, because of their easy dispersal and fast colonization of young root systems of ECM host trees. Scleroderma spp. can improve afforestation efforts (Itoo and Reshi 2014) because they are able to tolerate high temperatures and to persist in conditions of drought, thanks to the production of abundant mycelium and rhizomorphs which facilitates water transport (Jeffries 1999). In particular, Scleroderma spp., Hebeloma arenosum, and H. sacchariolens were found in association with the chestnut hybrid clone 111 in both grafted and ungrafted plants, whereas Inocybe spp. were found in all the groups. This fact is not surprising; species of Hebeloma, Inocybe, and Laccaria also colonize roots of young Betula trees (Mason et al. 1984), and Inocybe and Laccaria were the first colonizers of Salix renii in pioneer conditions (Nara et al. 2003). Interestingly, all Laccaria spp. identified in the present study have not been previously recorded in association with chestnuts and have been identified now for the first time in Galicia.
On the other hand, Lactarius and Tricholoma species, generally dominant in C. sativa mature stands (Diamandis and Perlerou 2001; Laganà et al. 2002; Blom et al 2009; Baptista et al. 2010; Polemis et al. 2011; Álvarez-La Fuente 2015; Ambrosio and Zotti 2015; Baptista et al. 2015; Reis et al. 2016), were not found, which suggest that such species can be considered as late-stage fungal symbionts of woody trees. Other late-stage fungi, such as Russula and Boletus, were rarely found in symbiosis with the experimental saplings. Our data support the hypothesis that saplings are mostly associated with early-stage, generalistic fungal taxa.
To conclude, our study represents a first glance to the fungal partners hosted by young chestnut Castanea × coudercii hybrids by using molecular methods. Besides the characterization of the ECM fungal community, this investigation also provides a view of the soil saprotrophic fungi, reveals previously undetected fungal species, and highlights for the first time the impact of selected chestnut hybrid clones and grafting on fungal colonization rate. However, further genetic characterization of fungal species diversity and succession is needed, at a more large temporal and spatial scale, to unveil the major processes involved in the distribution of the fungal symbionts in chestnut orchards. Hopefully, the information on the ECM fungal community structure associated with grafted chestnuts hybrids could help in the sustainable management of the traditional chestnut agro-ecosystems, by improving beneficial activities of microorganisms in the soil and rhizosphere (Altieri 1999).
References
Agerer R (1987-2002) Color Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae. Einhorn-Verlag, Schwäbisch Gmünd
Álvarez-La Fuente A (2015) Estudio y caracterización de las micorrizas asociadas a Castanea sativa Mill. Obtención en vivero de planta inoculada de calidad con vistas a su utilización en reforestación y recuperación de zonas degradadas. PhD Thesis. Universidad de León, Spain
Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems Agr Ecosyst Environ 74(19):31
Ambrosio E, Zotti M (2015) Mycobiota of three Boletus edulis (and allied species) productive sites. Sydowia 67:197–216
Baptista P, Martins A, Tavares RM, Lino-Neto T (2010) Diversity and fruiting pattern of macrofungi associated with chestnut (Castanea sativa) in the Trás-os-Montes region (Northeast Portugal). Fungal Ecol 3(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2009.06.002
Baptista P, Reis F, Pereira E, Tavares RM, Santos P, Richard F, Selosse MA, Lino-Neto T (2015) Soil DNA pyrosequencing and fruitbody surveys reveal contrasting diversity for various fungal ecological guilds in chestnut orchards. Environ Microbiol Rep 7(6):946–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12336
Belmonte-Ureña LJ, Garrido-Cardenas JA, Camacho-Ferre F (2019) Analysis of world research on grafting in horticultural plants. Hortscience 55:112–120. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14533-19
Blom JM, Vannini A, Vettraino AM, Hale MD, Godbold DL (2009) Ectomycorrhizal community structure in a healthy and a Phytophthora-infected chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) stand in central Italy. Mycorrhiza 20:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-009-0256-z
Bouhier A (1979) La Galice, essai geographique d'analyse et d'interpretation d'un vieux complexe agraire. Université de Poitiers (ed.). Imprimerie Yonnaise, La Roche-sur-Yon (Vendée)
Branzanti MB, Rocca E, Pisi A (1999) Effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on chestnut ink disease. Mycorrhiza 9:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050007
Brundrett MC, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T, Malajczuk N (1996) Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture (No. 435-2016-33680). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Camberra, Australia: ACIAR Monograph
Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New York, NY, USA
Chira F, Chira D (2003) Contribution to the knowledge of mycorrhizal fungi of chestnut forests of Baia Maré Forest District. Mycology 17–18:83–84
Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS, Version 8.0: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. [Online] Available at:http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS
Conedera M, Krebs P, Tinner W, Pradella M, Torriani D (2004) The cultivation of Castanea sativa (Mill.) in Europe, from its origin to its diffusion on a continental scale. Veget Hist Archaeobot 13:161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-004-0038-7
Conedera M, Tinner W, Krebs P, de Rigo D, Caudullo G (2016) Castanea sativa in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds) European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off, EU, Luxembourg, pp 78–79
Diamandis S, Perlerou C (2001) The mycoflora of the chestnut ecosystems in Greece. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 76:499–504
Dinis LT, Ramos S, Gomes-Laranjo J, Peixoto F, Vallania R, Costa R, Botta R (2009) Phenology and reproductive biology in cultivar Judia (Castanea sativa Mill.). Acta Hortic 866(169):174
Douhan GW, Rizzo DM (2004) Phylogenetic divergence in a local population of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum. New Phytol 166:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01305.x
European Council (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Communities: 31992L0043
Fernández-López JL (2011) Identification of the genealogy of interspecific hybrids between Castanea sativa, Castanea crenata and Castanea mollissima. Forest Systems 20:65–80
Fernández-López JL (2013) Variedades para os soutos novos. Ed. Xunta de Galicia
Fernández-Lorenzo JL, Fernández-López MJ (2005) Reinvigoration of mature Castanea sativa by micrografting onto a juvenile clone. Acta Hortic 693:293–298. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.693.36
Fernández-Lorenzo JL, Crecente S (2010) In vivo serial micrografting of Castanea sativa in short cycles. Acta Hortic 866:291–296. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.866.35
Fullana-Pericás M, Conesa MA, Perez-Alfocea F, Galmés J (2019) The influence of grafting on crops’ photosynthetic performance, Plant Sci https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110250
Gardes M, Bruns TD (1996) Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: above and below-ground views. Can J Bot 74(10):1572–1583. https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-190
Giovannelli A, Giannini R (2000) Reinvigoration of mature chestnut (Castanea sativa) by repeated graftings and micropropagation. Tree Physiol 20:1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.18.1243
Goldschmidt EE (2014) Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front. Plant Sci. 5:727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00727
Hambleton S (2005) Meliniomyces, a new anamorph genus for root associated fungi with phylogenetic affinities to Rhizoscyphus ericae (Hymenoscyphus ericae), Leotiomycetes. Stud Mycol 53:1–27
Hardin JW, Leopold DJ, White FM (2001) Magnoliophyta (Angiosperms): Castanea Mill. Harlow & Harrar’s Textbook of Dendrology, 9th edition
Hilszczańska D, Sierota Z (2006) The role of Thelephora terrestris fungus in mycorrhization on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings I. Laboratory study. Sylwan 1:40–47
Horton TS, Bruns TD (2001) The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Mol Ecol 10:1855–1871. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333
Huang H, Norton JD, Boyhan GE, Abrahams BR (1994) Graft compatibility among chestnut (Castanea) species. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 119(6):1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.119.6.1127
Hu C, Zhu Y, Yang L, Chen S, Huang Y (2006) Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics of grafted and own-root seedling of cucumber under low temperature circumstances. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 26(2):247–253
Ikeda H, Shinji O, Kazuo A (1986) The comparison between soil and hydroponics in magnesium absorption of grafting cucumber and the effect of increased application of magnesium. Bull Natl Veg Res Ins Japan C 9:31–41
Iotti M, Zambonelli A (2006) A quick and precise technique for identifying ectomycorrhizas by PCR. Mycol. Res. 110:60–65
Itoo Z, Reshi Z (2014) Influence of ectomycorrhizal inoculation on Pinus wallichiana and Cedrus deodara seedlings under nursery conditions. Front Biol 9:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-014-1292-4
Jeffries P (1999) Scleroderma. In: Cairney JWG, Chambers SM (eds) Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Key Genera in Profile. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06827-4_7
Kühdorf K, Münzenberger B, Begerow D, Karasch-Wittmann C, Gómez-Laurito J, Hüttl RF (2014) Sebacina sp. is a mycorrhizal partner of Comarostaphylis arbutoides (Ericaceae). Mycol Progress 13:733–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0956-9
Laganà A, Salerni E, Barluzzi C, Perini C, De Dominicis V (2002) Macrofungi as long-term indicators of forest health and management in central Italy. Cryptogamie Mycol 23:39–50
Leonardi M, Paolocci F, Rubini A, Simonini G, Pacioni G (2005) Assessment of inter- and intra-specific variability in the main species of Boletus edulis complex by ITS analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 243(2):411–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.01.003
Macdonald B (1990) Principles of vegetative propagation, clonal selection and stock (mother) plants. In: Practical Woody Plant Propagation for Nursery Growerspp, pp 219–259
Macías F, Calvo de Anta R (2008) Mapas de solos de Galicia Escala 1:50000. Consellería de Medio Ambiente e Desenvolvemento Sostible, Xunta de Galicia
Mansilla Vázquez JP, Pérez Otero R, Pintos Varela C, Salinero Corral C, Iglesias Vázquez C (2000) Plagas y enfermedades del castaño en Galicia. Xunta de Galicia, Consellería de Agricultura, Ganadería e política Agroalimentaria, Santiago de Compostela
MAPAMA (2013) Cuarto Inventario Forestal Nacional. Área de Inventario y Estadísticas Forestales, Dirección General de Desarrollo Rural y Política Forestal, Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Madrid, España.
Martínez Cortizas A, Pérez Alberti A (2000) Atlas climático de Galicia. Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela
Martins A, Barroso J, País M (1996) Effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on survival and growth of micropropagated plants and seedlings of Castanea sativa mill. Mycorrhiza 6:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050135
Martins A, Casimiro A, Pais M (1997) Influence of mycorrhization on physiological parameters of micropropagated Castanea sativa Mill. plants. Mycorrhiza 7:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050176
Martins A, Marques G, Borges O, Portela E, Lousada J, Raimundo F, Madeira M (2011) Management of chestnut plantations for a multifunctional land use under Mediterranean conditions: effects on productivity and sustainability. Agrofor Syst 81(2):175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9355-2
Mason PA, Wilson J, Last FT (1983) The concept of succession in relation to the spread of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi on inoculated tree seedlings growing in unsterile soils. Plant Soil 71:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182659
Mason PA, Wilson J, Last FT (1984) Mycorrhizal fungi of Betula spp.: factors affecting their occurrence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section B. Proc Biol Sci 85 (1-2):141–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026972700000395X
Miranda-Fontaína ME, Fernández-López J, Vettraino AM, Vannini A (2007) Resistance of Castanea clones to Phytophthora cinnamomi: testing and genetic control. Silvae Genet 56:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2007-0002
Nara K, Nakaya H, Hogetsu T (2003) Ectomycorrhizal sporocarp succession and production during early primary succession on Mount Fuji. New Phytol 158:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00724.x
Ortega U, Duñabeitia M, Menendez S, Gonzalez-Murua C, Majada J (2004) Effectiveness of mycorrhizal inoculation in the nursery on growth and water relations of Pinus radiata in different water regimes. Tree Physiol 24(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.1.65
Peintner U, Iotti M, Klotz P, Bonuso E, Zambonelli A (2007) Soil fungal communities in a Castanea sativa (chestnut) forest producing large quantities of Boletus edulis sensu lato (porcini): where is the mycelium of porcini? Environ Microbiol 9:880–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01208.x
Pereira-Lorenzo S, Díaz-Hernández B, Ramos-Cabrer A (2010) Chestnut in Spain, from nut and timber production to industry. Acta Horticulturae 866:499–503. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.866.67
Pestaña Nieto M, Santolamazza Carbone S (2009) Characterization of juvenile maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) ectomycorrhizal fungal community using morphotyping, direct sequencing and fruitbodies sampling. Mycorrhiza 19:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-008-0207-0
Polemis E, Dimou DM, Pountzas L (2011) Mycodiversity studies in selected ecosystems of Greece: 5. Basidiomycetes associated with woods dominated by Castanea sativa (Nafpactia Mts., central Greece). Mycotaxon 115:535
Pulgar G, Villora G, Moreno DA, Romero L (2000) Improving the mineral nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: Nitrogen metabolism. Biol Plant 43:607–609. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002856117053
Reis F, Pereira E, Tavares M, Baptista P, Lino-Neto T (2016) Fungal community in chestnut orchards with different Hypholoma fasciculare aboveground abundance: potential implications for sustainable production. Rev. de Ciências Agrárias [online]. vol.40, n.1, pp.124–132. https://doi.org/10.19084/RCA15153.
Roces-Díaz JV, Díaz-Varela ER, Barrio-Anta M, Álvarez-Álvarez P (2018) Sweet chestnut agroforestry systems in North-western Spain: classification, spatial distribution and an ecosystem services assessment. Forest Syst 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2018271-11973
Román M, Boa E (2006) The marketing of Lactarius deliciosus in northern Spain. Econ Bot 60:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[284:TMOLDI]2.0.CO;2
Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cbzares B, Lucas WJ (1999) Phloem long-distance transport of CmNACP mRNA: Implications for supracellular regulation in plants. Development 126:4405–4419
Saikkonen K, Ahonen-Jonnarth U, Markkola AM, Helander M, TuomiJ Roitto M, Ranta H (1999) Defoliation and mycorrhizal symbiosis: a functional balance between carbon sources and below-ground sinks. Ecol Lett 2:19–26
Sánchez S, Gómez E, Martín M, De Miguel AM, Urban A, Barriuso J (2014) Experiments on the life cycle and factors affecting reproduction of Sphaerosporella brunnea provide evidence for rapid asexual propagation by conidiospores and for homothallism in an ectomycorrhizal competitor of cultivated truffle species. Fungal Ecol 8:69–75
Sinclair WA, Sylvia DM, Larsen AO (1982) Disease suppression and growth promotion in Douglas-fir seedlings by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata. For Sci 28(2):191–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/28.2.191
Stielow B, Bratek Z, Orczán AK, Rudnoy S, Hensel G, Hoffmann P, Klenk HP, Göker M (2011) Species delimitation in taxonomically difficult fungi: the case of Hymenogaster. PLoS One 6(1):e15614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015614
Straatsma G, Ayer F, Egli S (2001) Species richness, abundance, and phenology of fungal fruit bodies over 21 years in a Swiss forest plot. Mycol Res 105:515–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201004154
Trappe JM (1964) Mycorrhizal host and distribution of Cenococcum geophilum. Lloydia 27:100–106
Twieg BD, Durall DM, Simard SW (2007) Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in mixed temperate forests. New Phytol 176:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02173.x
Visser S (1995) Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in jack pine stands following wildfire. New Phytol 129:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb04309.x
Vohník M, Fendrych M, Kolařík M, Gryndler M, Hršelová H, Albrechtová J, Vosátka M (2007) The ascomycete Meliniomyces variabilis isolated froma sporocarp of Hydnotrya tulasnei (Pezizales) intracellularly colonises roots of ecto- and ericoid mycorrhizal host plants. Czech Mycol 59:215–226
Xunta de Galicia (2001) O Monte Galego en cifras. Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Dirección Xeral de Montes e Medio Ambiente Natural, Santiago de Compostela
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. Elena Benito Rueda for soil analysis and to Xesús Graña Carbajo and Jose Manuel Calvo Ríos for the help during field samplings. The authors acknowledge to the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (grant number RTI2018-095568-B-I00) for the Postdoctoral Contract to Serena Santolamazza-Carbone and to Hifas da Terra S.L. for the R&D contract to Laura Iglesias-Bernabé.
Funding
This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (grant number RTI2018-095568-B-I00) and Xunta de Galicia through “Red de Uso Sostenible de los Recursos Naturales y Agroalimentarios” (REDUSO, grant number ED431D 2017/18) and “Cluster of Agricultural Research and Development” (CITACA Strategic Partnership, grant numbered ED431E 2018/07). \
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, S.S-C. and E.S-S.; methodology, S.S-C. and L. I-B; formal analysis, S. S-C.; investigation, S.S-C. and L. I-B.; resources, E.S-S. and P.P.G.; data curation, S.S-C. and L. I-B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S-C.; writing—review and editing, S.S-C., L. I-B. and P.P.G.; supervision, P.P.G.; funding acquisition, E.S-S. and P.P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Santolamazza-Carbone, S., Iglesias-Bernabé, L., Sinde-Stompel, E. et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure in a young orchard of grafted and ungrafted hybrid chestnut saplings. Mycorrhiza 31, 189–201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-020-01015-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-020-01015-0