Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of bio-crystallogram images using neural networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study utilized a unique neural network model for texture image analysis to differentiate the crystallograms from pairs of fresh red pepper fruits from conventional and organic farms. The differences in visually analyzed samples are defined as the distribution of crystals on the circular glass underlay, the thin or thick structure of crystal needles, the angles between branches and side needles, etc. However, the visual description and definition of bio-crystallogram images has major disadvantages. A novel methodology called an image neural network (INN) has been developed to overcome these shortcomings. The 1,488 × 2,240 pixel bio-crystallogram images were acquired in a lab and cropped to 425 × 1,025 pixel images. These depicted either a conventional sweet red pepper or an organic sweet red pepper. A set of 19 images was utilized to train the image neural network. A new set of 4 images was then prepared to test the INN performance. Overall, the INN achieved an average recognition performance of 100 %. This high level of recognition suggests that the INN is a promising method for the discrimination of bio-crystallogram images. In addition, Hinton diagrams were utilized to display the optimality of the INN weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harms W (2004) Quality of organic food. Genet Eng Newslett (Special Issue) 16:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pfeiffer E (1931) Studium von Formkr¨aften an Kristallizationen. Naturwissenschaftliche Sektion am Goetheanum, Dornach, Switzerland

  3. Engqvist M (1970) Gestaltkrafte des Lebendigen. Klostermann, Frankfurt amMain, Germany

  4. Bloksma J, Northolt M, Huber M (2001) Parameters for apple quality part-1. Louis Bolk Institute, p 115 (Archieved at http://orgprint.org/4266)

  5. Andersen JO, Henriksen CB, Laursen J, Nielsen AA (1999) Computerised image analysis of biocrystallograms originating from agricultural products. Comput Electron Agric 22(1):51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meelursarn A (2006) Statistical evaluation of texture analysis from the biocrystallization method: effect of image parameters to differentiate samples from different farming systems, submitted in fulfillment for the degree of doctor of agricultural science. University of Kassel, Department of Organic Food Quality and Food Culture, Witzenhausen, December 2006, p 220

  7. Kuşçu A (2008) Organik ve Konvansiyonel Kırmızıbiber ve Ürünlerinin Ayırt Edilebilme Yöntemleri ve Kalite Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ph.D. Thesis, 420 p, Izmir

  8. Doesburg P, Huber M (2007) Biocrystallisation and Steigbild results at the Louis Bolk Instituut. Elemente Der Naturwissenschaft 87:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  9. Balzer-Graf UR, Köpke U, Geier U (2001) Research on quality in organic agriculture by picture forming methods, understanding the quality of organic horticultural products (Short Course on). 15–26 May, Izmir, Turkey

  10. Szulc M, Cordeiro F, Maquet A, Anklam E (2005) Application of a multivariate design approach for maximisation of the observed differences between organically and conventionally grown wheat grains in biocrystallisation method. In: Proceedings of the 1st scientific FQH conference, November 28th & 29th, Fibl, Frick, p 78

  11. Timothy Masters (1993) Practical neural networks. Academic Press Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts

  12. Kendall MG, Stuart A (1963) The advanced theory of statistics. Charles Griffin & Company Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cichocki A, Unbehauen R (1992) Neural networks for optimization and signal processing. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman JA, Skapura DM (1991) Neural networks algorithms, applications, and programming techniques. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by backpropagation error. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollis PW, Paulos JJ (1988) Artificial neural networks using MOS analog multipliers. In: International conference on neural networks

  17. Hollis PW, Paulos JJ (1994) A neural network learning algorithm tailored for VLSI implementation. In: IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol. 5, No. 5

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet S. Unluturk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unluturk, S., Unluturk, M.S., Pazir, F. et al. Discrimination of bio-crystallogram images using neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 24, 1221–1228 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1346-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1346-6

Keywords

Navigation