Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to compare total orchiectomy, subcapsular orchiectomy, and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue treatment in patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer in terms of efficacy of androgen deprivation treatment (ADT), patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), development of phantom testis syndrome (PTS), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Method

Among 272 patients treated between July 2015 and January 2019, 189 patients were enrolled in this prospective, cohort study and the patients were divided into three groups: group I, bilateral total orchiectomy (n 66); group II, bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy (n 63); and group III, LHRH analogue treatment (n 60). The adequacy of ADT was routinely monitored every 3 months and clinical parameters were evaluated. After 6 to 36 months following ADT, questionnaires were used to evaluate PTS, PTSD, and HRQoL during outpatient visits. The patient satisfaction was questioned as yes/no.

Results

Adequate castration was provided with all three treatments, while the presence and frequency of PTS and severity of PTSD were lower, and patient satisfaction related to ADT and all components of HRQoL were better in patients undergoing subcapsular orchiectomy than those undergoing total orchiectomy. All findings except for PTS were similar in patients undergoing subcapsular orchiectomy and LHRH analogue treatment. In analysis of all patients, total incidence of PTS was 43.4% and PTSD was reported to be 48.7%. A strong relationship was found between PTSD and phantom testis pain (r 0.621, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Subcapsular orchiectomy has less psychosocial side effects than total orchiectomy and is similar to LHRH analogue treatment. It can be a reliable, cheaper, and fast-acting alternative to LHRH analogue treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Fanti S, et al. (2019) European Association of Urology guidelines on prostate cancer: the 2019 update. ISBN 978-94-92671-05-9. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/ Accessed 19 March 2019

  2. Østergren PB, Kistorp C, Fode M, Henderson J, Bennedbæk FN, Faber J, Sønksen Jet al.Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists are superior to subcapsular orchiectomy in lowering testosterone levels of men with prostate cancer: results from a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2017;197(6):1441–1447 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.003

  3. Orakwe DE, Tijani KH, Jeje EA, Ogunjimi MA, Rufus WO, Alabi TO (2018) Bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy versus bilateral total orchiectomy: comparison of the quality of life post-orchiectomy. Niger Postgrad Med J 25(1):43–47. https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_169_17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal M, Agrawal MS (2015) Can subepididymal orchiectomy re-emerge as the treatment of choice in patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma? Indian J Surg 77(1):23–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0741-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rud O, Peter J, Kheyri R, Gilfrich C, Ahmed AM, Boeckmann W, Fabricius PG, May Met al (2012) Subcapsular orchiectomy in the primary therapy of patients with bone metastasis in advanced prostate cancer: an anachronistic intervention? Ther Adv Urol 2012:190624 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/190624

  6. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, Bolla M, Cornford P, De Santis M, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on prostate cancer: the 2016 update. ISBN 978-94-92671-04-2. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer. Accessed 15 Mar 2019

  7. Pühse G, Wachsmuth JU, Kemper S, Husstedt IW, Kliesch S, Evers S (2010) Phantom testis syndrome: prevalence, phenomenology and putative mechanisms. Int J Androl 33(1):216–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00994.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobie DJ, Kivlahan DR, Maynard C, Bush KR, McFall M, Epler AJ et al (2002) Screening for post-traumatic stress disorder in female Veteran’s Affairs patients: validation of the PTSD checklist. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 24(6):367–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alkan A, Guc ZG, Senler FC, Yavuzsen T, Onur H, Dogan M, Karci E, Yasar A, Koksoy EB, Tanriverdi O, Turhal S, Urun Y, Ozkan A, Mizrak D, Akbulut Het al (2016) Breast cancer survivors suffer from persistent postmastectomy pain syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder (ORTHUS study): a study of the palliative care working committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). Support Care Cancer 24(9):3747–3755 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3202-6

  10. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee S-Y, Lee H-J, Kim Y-K, Kim S-H, Kim L, Lee MS et al (2004) Neurocognitive function and quality of life in relation to hematocrit levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Psychosom Res 57(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00528-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Riba LWN (1942) Subcapsular castration for carcinoma of prostate. J Urol 48:384–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)70724-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein S, Sersen EA, Vetter RJ (1968) Phantoms following orchiectomy. Neuropsychologia 6(1):61–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(68)90039-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bokemeyer C, Frank B, Schöffski P, Poliwoda H, Schmoll HJ (1993) Phantom sensation after orchiectomy for testicular cancer. Int J Oncol 2(4):633–636. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2.4.633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA (2002) Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. A conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev 22(4):499–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bapat S, Mahajan PM, Bhave AA, Kshirsagar YB, Sovani YB, Mulay A (2011) Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate. Indian J Surg 73(3):175–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0207-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Roosen JU, Klarskov OP, Mogensen P (2005) Subcapsular versus total orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: a randomized trial. Scand J Urol Nephrol 39(6):464–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590500220230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh P, Agrawal T, Yadav S, Nayak B, Seth A, Dogra PN (2018) A comparative study of the effects of medical versus surgical androgen deprivation therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic carcinoma prostate. Indian J Cancer 55(2):148–153. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_531_17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foley KM (1987) Pain syndromes in patients with cancer. Med Clin North Am 71:169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30864-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neto MS, de Aguiar Menezes MV, Moreira JR, Garcia EB, Abla LE, Ferreira LM (2013) Sexuality after breast reconstruction post mastectomy. Aesthet Plast Surg 37(3):643–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0082-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meijuan Y, Zhiyou P, Yuwen T, Ying F, Xinzhong C (2013) A retrospective study of postmastectomy pain syndrome: incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and influence on quality of life. Sci World J 2013:159732. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/159732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H (2009) Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA 302(18):1985–1992. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alter CL, Pelcovitz D, Axelrod A, Goldenberg B, Harris H, Meyers B (1996) Identification of PTSD in cancer survivors. Psychosomatics 37:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(96)71580-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pühse G, Wachsmuth JU, Kemper S, Husstedt IW, Evers S, Kliesch S (2012) Chronic pain has a negative impact on sexuality in testis cancer survivors. J Androl 33:886–893. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.110.012500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cayan S, Kendirci M, Yaman O, Ascı R, Orhan I, Usta MF et al (2017) Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in men over 40 years of age in Turkey: results from the Turkish Society of Andrology Male Sexual Health Study Group. Turk J Urol 43(2):122–129. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.24886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Selvi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval for research involving human participants

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (protocol number: 2018-07/56) at Health Science University Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital. All procedures performed in our study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

A formal written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The data of patients who did not consent was not used.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvi, I., Basar, H. Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects. Support Care Cancer 28, 4313–4326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05266-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05266-2

Keywords

Navigation