Skip to main content
Log in

Industrial workwear for hot workplace environments: thermal management attributes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personal protective clothing (PPC) is critical for worker safety and wellbeing from both protection and thermal management perspectives, particularly as PPC typically covers more than 90% of the body. Research of PPC in low-risk categories such as mining, oil, gas, and construction and their thermal management attributes is limited, although these industries represent a significant proportion of the industrial workforce, work across a broad range of major industries, and frequently work in hot and/or humid thermal environments. This study evaluated and characterized the thermal management attributes of a selection of commercial low-level risk PPC ensembles currently used around the world as well as a civilian/corporate wear ensemble, using a sweating thermal manikin. The results demonstrate that there are substantially poorer thermal attributes for the PPC ensembles. Predicted Heat Strain Index (PHS) results for hot conditions reveal significantly lower duration limited exposure (DLE) and considerably greater body water loss for the wearers of PPC. Opportunities to substantially reduce PPC material mass and improve construction for these low-level risk categories in order to enhance thermal management performance are identified. Relationships between the thermal attributes of PPC and civilian clothing, and their garment construction, fit, and material characteristics are identified, providing new and important knowledge for current performance and direction for development of new improved PPC. This study provides researchers, developers, and garment designers with valuable insights for future improvement of PPC to create improved PPC for industrial workwear worn in hot environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Adams PS, Keyserling WM (1993) Three methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing: a comparative study. Int J Ind Ergon 12(3):177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams PS, Slocum AC, Monroe KW (1994) A model for protective clothing effects on performance. Int J Cloth Sci Technol 6(4):6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM International (2010a) ASTM F1291-Standard Test Method for measuring the thermal insulation of clothing using a heated manikin. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA

  • ASTM International (2010b) ASTM F2370-Standard Test Method for measuring the evaporative resistance of clothing using a sweating manikin. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA

  • Australian Bureau of Meteorology (2014) Weather conditions for Western Australia. www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/annual/wa/summary.shtml. Accessed 15/05/14 2014

  • Brake DJ, Bates GP (2002) Limiting metabolic rate (thermal work limit) as an index of thermal stress. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 17(3):176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brake DJ, Bates GP (2003) Fluid losses and hydration status of industrial workers under thermal stress working extended shifts. Occup Environ Med 60(2):90–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bröde P, Kuklane K, Candas C, Den Hartog EA, Griefahn B, Holmér I, Meinander H, Nocker W, Richards M, Havenith G (2010) Heat gain from thermal radiation through protective clothing with different insulation, reflectivity and vapour permeability. International J Occup Saf Ergon 16(2):231-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2010.11076842

  • Campbell RB, Dini DA (2016) Occupational injuries from electrical shock and arc flash events. Springer, New York, USA

  • Carter BJ, Cammermeyer M (1985) Biopsychological responses of medical unit personnel wearing chemical defense ensemble in a simulated chemical warfare environment. Mil Med 150(5):239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan APC, Yang Y, Guo YP, Yam MCH, Song WF (2015) Evaluating the physiological and perceptual responses of wearing a newly designed construction work uniform. Text Res J 86(6):659–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517515591773

  • Chevron Corporation (2016) our-businesses/barrow-island. Chevron Corporation. www.chevronaustralia.com/our-businesses/barrow-island. Accessed 25/02/2016

  • Crown EM, Ackerman MY, Dale JD, Tan Y-b (1998) Design and evaluation of thermal protective flightsuits. Part II: instrumented mannequin evaluation. Cloth Text Res J 16(2):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue AM (2004) Occupational health hazards in mining: an overview. Occup Med (Lond) 54(5):283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman LE, Havenith G (2005a) The effects of protective clothing on metabolic rate. In: Holmér K, Gao (eds) Environmental Ergonomics, vol. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics, Ystad, Sweden, pp. 82–85

  • Dorman LE, Havenith G (2005b) The influence of clothing weight and bulk on metabolic rate when wearing protective clothing. In: 3rd International Conference on Human-Environment System, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman LE, Havenith G (2007) The effects of protective clothing and its properties on energy consumption during different activities: literature review, THERMPROTECT G6RD-CT-2002-00846, Report 2007-1, Loughborough University. Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough, United Kingdom

  • Dorman LE, Havenith G (2009) The effects of protective clothing on energy consumption during different activities. Eur J Appl Physiol 105(3):463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan A (1988) Energy cost of stepping in protective clothing ensembles. Ergonomics 31(1):3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliotts Australia Pty Ltd (2016) About us. Elliotts Australia http://elliotts.net. Accessed 08/01/2016 2016

  • Galloway SDR (1999) Dehydration, rehydration, and exercise in the heat: rehydration strategies for athletic competition. Can J Appl Physiol 24(2):188–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao C, Kuklane K, Östergren P-O, Kjellstrom T (2018) Occupational heat stress assessment and protective strategies in the context of climate change. Int J Biometeorol 62(3):359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havenith G, Heus R, Lotens WA (1990) Resultant clothing insulation: a function of body movement, posture, wind, clothing fit and ensemble thickness. Ergonomics 33(1):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmér I (2006) Protective clothing in hot environments. Ind Health 44(3):404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Li Y, Yeung K-w, Wong AS, Xu W (2005) Moisture management tester: a method to characterize fabric liquid moisture management properties. Text Res J 75(1):57–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J (2012) Theoretical analysis of three methods for calculating thermal insulation of clothing from thermal manikin. Ann Occup Hyg 56(6):728–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck J, Maganga O, Kim Y (1997) Protective overalls: evaluation of garment design and fit. Int J Cloth Sci Technol 9(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2004) ISO 7933:2004 Ergonomics of the thermal environment—analytical determination and interpretation of heat stress using calculation of the predicted heat strain. ISO, Geneva

  • ISO (2015) ISO 11612:2015 Protective clothing-Clothing to protect against heat and flame-Minimum performance requirements. ISO, Geneva

  • Johansson B (2019) PHS simulation. Lund University. http://www.eat.lth.se/fileadmin/eat/Termisk_miljoe/PHS/PHS.html. Accessed June 22nd 2019

  • Kim IY, Lee C, Li P, Corner BD, Paquette S (2002) Investigation of air gaps entrapped in protective clothing systems. Fire Mater 26(3):121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kofler P, Herten A, Heinrich D, Bottoni G, Hasler M, Faulhaber M, Bechtold T, Nachbauer W, Burtscher M (2013) Viscose as an alternative to aramid in workwear: influence on endurance performance, cooling, and comfort. Text Res J 83(19):2085–2092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuklane K, Gao C, Holmér I (2006) Effects of natural solar radiation on manikin heat exchange. In: 3rd European Conference on Protective Clothing and NOKOBETEF 8. Protective clothing-towards balanced protection. Central Institute for Labour Protection, Warszawa, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklane K, Toma R, Lucas RA (2020) Insulation and evaporative resistance of clothing for sugarcane harvesters and chemical sprayers, and their application in PHS model-based exposure predictions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(9):3074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg S, Mahanty A (1986) Energy cost of backpacking in heavy boots. Ergonomics 29(3):433–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2001) The science of clothing comfort. Textile Progress 31(1-2):117–120

  • Lundgren K, Kuklane K, Gao C, Holmer I (2013) Effects of heat stress on working populations when facing climate change. Ind Health 51(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairiaux P, Malchaire J (1985) Workers self-pacing in hot conditions: a case study. Appl Ergon 16(2):85–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malchaire J, Piette A, Kampmann B, Mehnert P, Gebhardt H, Havenith G, den Hartog E, Holmer I, Parsons K, Alfano G, Griefahn B (2001) Development and validation of the predicted heat strain model. Ann Occup Hyg 45(2):123–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion T, Nichevich A (2013) Ergonomic safety apparel: research & development project brief. Chevron Australia, Perth, Australia

  • Mert E, Psikuta A, Bueno MA, Rossi RM (2015) Effect of heterogenous and homogenous air gaps on dry heat loss through the garment. Int J Biometeorol 59(11):1701–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller V, Bates G, Schneider JD, Thomsen J (2011) Self-pacing as a protective mechanism against the effects of heat stress. Ann Occup Hyg 55(5):548–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Fire Protection Association (2012) NFPA® 70E Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace. NFPA, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 USA

  • Nawaz N, Troynikov O (2018) Firefighters’ protective jackets: fit to female form and its effects on attributes relevant to thermal comfort. J Occup Environ Hyg 15(11):792–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen BW (2000) Guidelines for comfort. ASHRAE J 42(8):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons K (2014) Human thermal environments: the effects of hot, moderate, and cold environments on human health, comfort, and performance, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London, England

  • Parsons KC, Havenith G, Holmér I, Nilsson H, Malchaire J (1999) The effects of wind and human movement on the heat and vapour transfer properties of clothing. Ann Occup Hyg 43(5):347–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Psikuta A, Frackiewicz-Kaczmarek J, Frydrych I, Rossi R (2012) Quantitative evaluation of air gap thickness and contact area between body and garment. Text Res J 82(14):1405–1413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raccuglia M, Hodder S, Havenith G (2017) Human wetness perception: from skin to clothing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 49(5S):511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CJ, Havenith G (2011) Body mapping of sweating patterns in male athletes in mild exercise-induced hyperthermia. Eur J App Physiol 111(7):1391–1404

  • Song G (2007) Clothing air gap layers and thermal protective performance in single layer garment. J Ind Text 36(3):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Paskaluk S, Sati R, Crown EM, Doug Dale J, Ackerman M (2011) Thermal protective performance of protective clothing used for low radiant heat protection. Text Res J 81(3):311–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (2009) AS/NZS 4967:2009 Protective clothing for firefighters-requirements and test methods for protective clothing used for structural firefighting. SAI Global Limited, Sydney, Australia

  • Sullivan PJ, Mekjavic (1993) Temperature and humidity within the clothing microenvironment. Aviat Space Environ Med 63(3):186–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor NA (2006) Challenges to temperature regulation when working in hot environments. Ind Health 44(3):331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor NAS, Lewis MC, Notley SR, Peoples GE (2012) A fractionation of the physiological burden of the personal protective equipment worn by firefighters. Eur J Appl Physiol 112(8):2913–2921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thermetrics a subsidiary of Measurement Technology NW (2016) full-body-manikins/Newton. www.thermetrics.com/products/full-body-manikins/newton. Accessed 25/02/2016

  • Tuffa Workwear Pty Ltd (2016) Tuffa. Tuffa Workwear. http://tuffaworkwear.com.au. Accessed 25/05 2016

  • Ueda H, Havenith G (2005) The effect of fabric air permeability on clothing ventilation. Elsevier Ergonomics Book Series, vol 3. Elselvier B.V, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-347X(05)80054-0

  • Wachtel TL, Berry CC, Wachtel EE, Frank HA (2000) The inter-rater reliability of estimating the size of burns from various burn area chart drawings. Burns 26(2):156–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Koganezawa S, Horikoshi T, Tomita A (2008) Measurement of solar radiation absorptance of different clothing fabric for outdoor thermal comfort study. Nihon Seikisho Gakkai Zasshi 45(4):121

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson CG (2020) Improved personal protective clothing for mining, oil and gas personnel working in hot environmental conditions. Dissertation, RMIT University, Unpublished

  • Wong DPL, Chung JWY, Chan APC, Wong FKW, Yi W (2014) Comparing the physiological and perceptual responses of construction workers (bar benders and bar fixers) in a hot environment. Appl Ergon 45(6):1705–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf K (2009) Flame-resistant clothing. Prof Saf 54(6):52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermakova I, Dukchnovskaya K, Nikolaienko A, Troynikov O, Nawaz N (2011) Dynamic evaluation of fire fighters thermal responses in different ensembles using mathematical model. In: 14th Int. Conf. on Environmental Ergonomics. Nafplio, Greece, pp. 367–372

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Chevron Australia Pty. Ltd. for supplying the Personal Protective Clothing (PPC) garments for this study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Watson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watson, C., Troynikov, O., Kuklane, K. et al. Industrial workwear for hot workplace environments: thermal management attributes. Int J Biometeorol 65, 1751–1765 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02130-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02130-z

Keywords

Navigation