Skip to main content
Log in

A digital-twin and machine-learning framework for precise heat and energy management of data-centers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The massive growth in data-centers has led to increased interest and regulations for management of waste heat and its utilization. This work seeks to develop a combined Digital-Twin and Machine-Learning framework to optimize such systems by controlling both the ventilation and the cooling of the bases of data units/processors in the system. This framework ascertains optimal cooling strategies to deliver a target temperature in the system using a minimum amount of energy. A model problem is constructed for a data-center, where the design variables are the flow rates and air-cooling at multiple ventilation ports and ground-level conduction-based base-cooling of processors. A thermo-fluid model, based on the Navier–Stokes equations and the first law of thermodynamics, for the data-center is constructed and a rapid, stencil-based, iterative solution method is developed. This is then combined with a genomic-based machine-learning algorithm to develop a digital-twin (digital-replica) of the system that can run in real-time or faster than the actual physical system, making it suitable as either a design tool or an adaptive controller. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An inviscid or ”perfect” fluid is one where \(\varvec{\tau }^{vs}\) is taken to be zero, even when motion is present.

  2. As in the previous example, a \(20\times 20\times 20\) stencil grid was used along with a standard Macbook Pro laptop for all calculations using a FORTRAN code written by the author.

  3. We have ignored thermal effects in this representation.

References

  1. Masanet E, Shehabi A, Lei N, Smith S, Koomey J (2020) Recalibrating global data-center energy-use estimates. Science 367(6481):984–986

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones N (2018) How to stop data centres from gobbling up the worlds electricity. Nature. 561(7722):163–166. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-018-06610-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shehabi A et al (2016) United States data-center Energy Usage Report. No. LBNL-1005775. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA, USA

  5. U.S. Department Of Energy (2020) Annual energy outlook 2020. https://www.eia.gov/Outlooks/Aeo/

  6. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2020) How much carbon dioxide is produced per kilowatthour of U.S. Electricity Generation. https://Www.eia.gov/Tools/Faqs/Faq.php Id=74&T=11

  7. Brown R, Masanet E, Nordman B, Tschudi W, Shehabi A, Stanley J, Koomey J, Sartor D, Chan P, Loper J, Capana S, Hedman B, Duff R, Haines E, Sass D, Fanara A (2007) Report to congress on server and data-center energy efficiency: Public Law 109-431. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. LBNL-363E

  8. Masanet E, Brown RE, Shehabi A, Koomey JG, Nordman B (2011) Estimating the energy use and efficiency potential of U.S. data-centers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 99, no 8

  9. Koomey JG (2011) Growth in data-center electricity use 2005 to 2010. Analytics Press, Oakland, CA. http://www.analyticspress.com/datacenters.html

  10. Upton F (2015) North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2015. H.R. 8, 114th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/8

  11. Koomey J (2008) Worldwide electricity used in data-centers. Environ Res Lett 3:034008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koomey JG (2007) Estimating total power consumption by servers in the U.S. and the World. February 15. http://www.mediafire.com/file/exywo1hf6ionskw/AMDserverpowerusecomplete-final.pdf

  13. Van Heddeghem W, Lambert S, Lannoo B, Colle D, Pickavet M, Demeester P (2014) Trends in worldwide ICT electricity consumption from 2007 to 2012. Comput Commun 50:64–76

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lanzisera S, Nordman B, Brown RE (2012) Data network equipment energy use and savings potential in buildings. Energy Effic 5(2):149–162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reviriego P, Maestro JA, Larrabeiti D (2010) Burst transmission for energy-efficient ethernet. IEEE Internet Comput 14(4):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dudkowski D, Hasselmeyer P (2015) Energy-efficient networking in modern data-centers. In: Samdanis K, Rost P, Maeder A, Meo M, Verikoukis C (eds) Green communications: principles, concepts and practice. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tschudi W, Xu T, Sartor D, Stein J (2003) High performance data centers: a research roadmap. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL53483. http://hightech.lbl.gov/documents/DataCenters_Roadmap_Final.pdf

  18. Greenberg S, Mills E, Tschudi B, Rumsey P, Myatt B (2006) Best practices for data-centers: lessons learned from benchmarking 22 data-centers. In: Proceedings of the ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings in Asilomar, CA. ACEEE, August, vol 3, pp 76–87. http://eetd.lbl.gov/emills/PUBS/PDF/ACEEE-datacenters.pdf

  19. Malone C, Belady C (2006) Metrics to characterize datacenter & IT equipment energy use. In: Proceedings of the digital power forum, Richardson, TX, September

  20. Sullivan A (2010) Energy star for data-centers. Green Grid Forum. February 4

  21. Cheung IH, Greenberg S, Mahdavi R, Brown R, Tschudi W (2014) Energy efficiency in small server rooms: field surveys and findings. In: Proceedings the 2014 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. LBNL-6952E

  22. Masanet E, Shehabi A, Ramakrishnan L, Liang J, Ma X, Walker B, Mantha P (2013) The energy efficiency potential of cloud-based software: a US case study. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shehabi A, Masanet E, Price H, Traber K, Horvath A, Nazaroff WW (2011) Data center design and location: consequences for electricity use and greenhouse-gas emissions. Build Environ 46(5):990–998

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koomey JG, Berard S, Sanchez M, Wong H (2011) Implications of historical trends in the electrical efficiency of computing. Ann Hist Comput IEEE 33(3):46–54

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Koomey J, Samuel N (2015) Efficiency’s brief reprieve: Moore’s Law slowdown hits performance more than energy efficiency. In: IEEE Spectrum. April. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/moores-law-might-be-slowing-down-but-not-energyefficiency

  26. Torcellini P, Long N, Judkoff R (2003) Consumptive water use for U.S. power production. NREL/TP-550- 33905, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/33905.pdf

  27. Miller R (2009) Data-centers move to cut water waste. Data-center knowledge. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/09/data-centers-move-to-cut-waterwaste

  28. Fitzgerald D (2015) Data-centers and hidden water use. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10007111583511843695404581067903126039290

  29. Federal Data-Center Consolidation Initiative (FDCCI) (2014) GSA FDCCI Inventory Data Fields. https://cio.gov/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/FDCCI-InventoryData-Fields-Release-2.pdf

  30. Boyd A (2015) Experts: data-center consolidation goals not aggressive enough. Federal Times.com. http://www.federaltimes.com/story/government/it/datacenter/2015/02/17/data-center-consolidation-goals-not-aggressive/23556995/

  31. McMillian R (2015) Zombie servers: theyre here and doing nothing but burning energy. The Wall Street Journal. September 13, 2015. http://www.wsj.com/articles/zombie-serverstheyre-here-and-doing-nothing-but-burning-energy-1442197727

  32. Delforge P, Whitney J (2014) Issue paper: data-center efficiency assessment scaling up energy efficiency across the data-center industry: evaluating key drivers and barriers. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

  33. Lo D, Cheng L, Govindaraju R, Ranganathan P, Kozyrakis C (2015) Heracles: improving resource efficiency at scale. In: Proceedings of the 42nd annual international symposium on computer architecture. ACM, pp 450–462

  34. Masanet E, Shehabi A, Ramakrishnan L, Liang J, Ma X, Walker B, Hendrix V, Mantha P (2013) The energy efficiency potential of cloud-based software: a US case study. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heller B, Seetharaman S, Mahadevan P, Yiakoumis Y, Sharma P, Banerjee S, McKeown N (2010) ElasticTree: saving energy in data-center networks. NSDI 10:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hilty LM, Aebischer B (eds) (2015) ICT innovations for sustainability, advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  37. Masanet ER, Matthews HS (eds) (2010) Environmental applications of information and communication technology [special issue]. J Ind Ecol 14:685–862

  38. Rejeski D (ed) (2002) E-Commerce, the Internet, and the Environment [special issue]. J Ind Ecol 6:1–161

  39. Roberts S (2009) Measuring the relationship between ICT and the environment. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/sti/43539507.pdf

  40. Auweter DK, Tahamtan A, Tjoa AM, Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J, Kleinberg JM, Mattern F, Mitchell JC, Naor M, Nierstrasz O, Pandu Rangan C, Steffen B, Sudan M, Terzopoulos D, Tygar D, Vardi MY, Weikum G (eds) (2012) ICT as key technology against global warming, vol 7453. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32606-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Erdmann L, Hilty L, Goodman J, Arnfalk P (2004) The future impact of ICTs on environmental sustainability. Technical Report No. EUR 21384 EN. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain

  42. Jorgensen MS, Andersen MM, Hansen A, Wenzel H, Thoning T, Pedersen UJ, Falch M, Rasmussen B, Olsen SI, Willum O (2006) Green technology foresight about environmentally friendly products and materials. Environmental Protection Agency Den. http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publications/2006/87-7052-216-2/pdf/87-7052-217-0.pdf

  43. Romm J, Rosenfeld A, Herrmann S (1999) The internet economy and global warming: a scenario of the impact of e-commerce on energy and the environment. Cent. Energy Clim. Solut. Dec. httpwww Cool-Co, Orgenergycecs Cfm

  44. Laitner JA, Ehrhardt-Martinez K (2008) Information and communication technologies: the power of productivity (E081). American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  45. Elliott N, Molina M, Trombley D (2012) A defining framework for intelligent efficiency. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC. http://aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/e125.pdf

  46. Accenture (2015) SMARTer2030: ICT solutions for 21st century challenges. http://smarter2030.gesi.org/downloads/Full_report2.pdf

  47. Rattle R (2010) Computing our way to paradise: the role of internet and communication technologies in sustainable consumption and globalization. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  48. Berkhout F, Hertin J (2004) De-materialising and re-materialising: digital technologies and the environment. Futures 36:903–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2004.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Borjesson Rivera M, Hakansson C, Svenfelt A, Finnveden G (2014) Including second order effects in environmental assessments of ICT. Environ Model Softw 56:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Erdmann L, Hilty LM (2010) Scenario analysis: exploring the macroeconomic impacts of information and communication technologies on greenhouse gas emissions. J Ind Ecol 14:826–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00277.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Koomey JG, Matthews HS, Williams E (2013) Smart everything: will intelligent systems reduce resource use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38:311–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-021512-110549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yi L, Thomas HR (2007) A review of research on the environmental impact of e-business and ICT. Environ Int 33:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Allenby B, Unger D (2001) Information technology impacts on the US energy demand profile. RAND Corp, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  54. Azevedo IML (2014) Consumer end-use energy efficiency and rebound effects. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39:393–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-021913-153558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Borenstein S (2013) A microeconomic framework for evaluating energy efficiency rebound and some implications. National Bureau of Economic Research

  56. Hilty LM, Arnfalk P, Erdmann L, Goodman J, Lehmann M, Wager PA (2006) The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability—a prospective simulation study. Environ Model Softw 21:1618–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hesse M (2002) Shipping news: the implications of electronic commerce for logistics and freight transport. Resour Conserv Recycl 36:211–240

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shorr Packaging Corp (2015) The Amazon effect: impacts on shipping and retail. http://www.shorr.com/packaging-news/2015-06/amazon-effect-impacts-shipping-and-retail. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

  59. Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28:389–401

    Google Scholar 

  60. Plepys A (2002) The grey side of ICT. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:509–523

    Google Scholar 

  61. Williams E (2011) Environmental effects of information and communications technologies. Nature 479:354–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Weber C et al (2008) Life cycle comparison of traditional retail and e-commerce logistics for electronic products: a case study of buy.com. Green Design Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.ce.cmu.edu/~greendesign/research/Buy_com_report_final_030209.pdf

  63. Shehabi A, Walker B, Masanet E (2014) The energy and greenhouse-gas implications of internet video streaming in the United States. Environ Res Lett 9:054007

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kitou E, Horvath A (2008) External air pollution costs of telework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  65. Henderson P, Waitner M (2013) Real-time energy management: a case study of three large commercial buildings in Washington, DC. Natural Resources Defense Council. http://www.nrdc.org/business/casestudies/files/tower-companies-case-study.pdf

  66. Seidel S, Ye J (2012) Leading by example: using information and communication technologies to achieve federal sustainability goals. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/federal-sustainability-ict.pdf

  67. Laitner JA, Ehrhardt-Martinez K (2008) Information and communication technologies: the power of productivity. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. http://aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/E081.pdf

  68. Baer WS, Hassell S, Vollaard BA (2002) Electricity requirements for a digital society. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hilty LM et al (2006) The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability—a prospective simulation study. Environ Model Softw 21:1618–1629

    Google Scholar 

  70. Romm J, Rosenfeld A, Herrmann S (1999) The internet economy and global warming: a scenario of the impact of e-commerce on energy and the environment. Cent. Energy Clim. Solut. Dec. httpwww Cool-Co. Orgenergycecs Cfm. http://www.fraw.org.uk/files/tech/romm_1999.pdf

  71. Laitner JA, McDonnell MT, Keller RM (2015) ICT-enabled intelligent efficiency: shifting from device-specific approaches to system optima. http://cda.iea4e.org/document/11/ict-enabled-intelligent-efficiency-shifting-from-device-specific-approachesto-system-optima

  72. Horner N, Azevedo I (2016) Power usage effectiveness in data-centers: overloaded and underachieving. Electr J 29(4):61–69

    Google Scholar 

  73. Azevedo D, Rawson A (2008) Measuring data-center productivity. Metrics and Measurements Work Group. The Green Grid. http://www.thegreengrid.org/~/media/TechForumPresentations2008/Measuring_Data_Center_P roductivity.pdf lang=en

  74. Kaplan J, Forrest W, Kindler N (2008) Revolutionizing data-center energy efficiency. McKinsey & Company. http://www.sallan.org/pdfdocs/McKinsey_Data_Center_Efficiency.pdf

  75. Cappiello C, Chen D, Ferreria AM, Henis R, Jiang T, Kat I, Kipp A, Liu J, Sotnikov D, Vitali M (2011) Usage centric green performance indicators. http://www.sigmetrics.org/sigmetrics2011/greenmetrics/green11_Kat_email.pdf

  76. Shehabi A, Smith SJ, Horner N, Azevedo I, Brown R, Koomey J, Masanet E, Sartor D, Herrlin M, Lintner W (2016) United States data-center energy usage report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, LBNL-1005775

  77. Zohdi TI (2002) An adaptive-recursive staggering strategy for simulating multifield coupled processes in microheterogeneous solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53:1511–1532

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Zohdi TI (2005) Charge-induced clustering in multifield particulate flow. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62(7):870–898

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Zohdi TI (2007) Computation of strongly coupled multifield interaction in particle–fluid systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:3927–3950

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Zohdi TI (2010) On the dynamics of charged electromagnetic particulate jets. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(2):109–135

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Zohdi TI (2010) Simulation of coupled microscale multiphysical-fields in particulate-doped dielectrics with staggered adaptive FDTD. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:79–101

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Zohdi TI (2012) Electromagnetic properties of multiphase dielectrics. A primer on modeling, theory and computation. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Zohdi TI (2012) Dynamics of charged particulate systems. Modeling, theory and computation. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Zohdi TI (2013) Numerical simulation of charged particulate cluster-droplet impact on electrified surfaces. J Comput Phys 233:509–526

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  85. Zohdi TI (2014) A direct particle-based computational framework for electrically-enhanced thermo-mechanical sintering of powdered materials. Math Mech Solids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-013-9092-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Zohdi TI (2014) Embedded electromagnetically sensitive particle motion in functionalized fluids. Comput Part Mech 1:27–45

    Google Scholar 

  87. Zohdi TI (2018) Electrodynamic machine-learning-enhanced fault-tolerance of robotic free-form printing of complex mixtures. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1629-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Zohdi TI (2009) Mechanistic modeling of swarms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(21–26):2039–2051

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Zohdi TI (2018) Multiple UAVs for Mapping: a review of basic modeling, simulation and applications. Annu Rev Environ Resour. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zohdi TI (2019) The game of drones: rapid agent-based machine-learning models for multi-UAV path planning. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01761-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Zohdi T (2020) A machine-learning framework for rapid adaptive digital-twin based fire-propagation simulation in complex environments. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.112907

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural & artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  93. Holland JH, Miller JH (1991) Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory (PDF). Am Econ Rev 81(2):365–371 (Archived from the original (PDF) on October 27, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization & machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Davis L (1991) Handbook of genetic algorithms. Thompson Computer Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  96. Onwubiko C (2000) Introduction to engineering design optimization. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  97. Goldberg DE, Deb K (2000) Special issue on genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186(2–4):121–124

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Luenberger D (1974) Introduction to linear & nonlinear programming. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  99. Gill P, Murray W, Wright M (1995) Practical optimization. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the UC Berkeley College of Engineering and the USDA AI Institute for Next Generation Food Systems (AIFS), USDA award number 2020-67021- 32855.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. I. Zohdi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix: Related websites

  1. 1.

    https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/taking-next-steps-stockholm-circular-city/

  2. 2.

    https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/efficiency/

  3. 3.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_center

  4. 4.

    https://eta.lbl.gov/publications/united-states-data-center-energy

  5. 5.

    https://energyinnovation.org/2020/03/17/how-much-energy-do-data-centers-really-use/

  6. 6.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06610-y

  7. 7.

    https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/data-centers-and-servers

  8. 8.

    https://www.vxchnge.com/blog/growing-energy-demands-of-data-centers

  9. 9.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921003019

  10. 10.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/data-center-company-aligned-energy-raises-1-25-billion-in-debt-to-fund-sustainable-facilities-11629407307 mod=hp_minor_pos4

  11. 11.

    https://datacenterfrontier.com/waste-heat-utilization-data-center-industry/

Appendix: Further discussion on fluid mechanics models

Although we considered an incompressible thermally-insensitive fluid in the body of the work, for completeness, we briefly discuss enhancements to such models.

1.1 Pressure-density approximation

There are a variety of possible Equations of State that connect the density to the pressure, such as a Boussinesq-like relation, which is adequate to describe dense gases and fluids, derived fromFootnote 3

$$\begin{aligned} \rho \approx \rho _{o}(P_o)+\frac{\partial \rho }{\partial P}\Delta P, \end{aligned}$$
(8.1)

where \(\rho _{o}\) and \(P_o\) are reference values and \(\Delta P=P-P_o\). We define the bulk (compressibility) modulus by \(\zeta {\mathop {=}\limits ^\mathrm{def}}\rho \frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho }\), yielding

$$\begin{aligned} \rho \approx \rho _{o}\left( 1+\frac{1}{\zeta } \Delta P\right) \Rightarrow P\approx P_o+\zeta \left( \frac{\rho }{\rho _{o}}-1\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(8.2)

For a constant density case, \(\rho =\rho _{o}\), and utilizing the Boussinesq-like relation, \(P=P_o\).

1.2 Buoyancy

Although we will not consider buoyancy in the present analysis, for completeness we illustrate a typical model. Consider the following decomposition of the body forces:

$$\begin{aligned} \varvec{f}=\rho \varvec{g}=\rho _o\varvec{g}+(\rho -\rho _o)\varvec{g}. \end{aligned}$$
(8.3)

Now we approximate

$$\begin{aligned} (\rho -\rho _o)\varvec{g}\approx -\rho _o\beta (\theta -\theta _o)\varvec{g}, \end{aligned}$$
(8.4)

where \(\beta \) is the thermal expansion coefficient. Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta \rho =(\rho -\rho _o) \approx -\rho _o\beta (\theta -\theta _o), \end{aligned}$$
(8.5)

thus

$$\begin{aligned} \rho \approx \rho _o(1-\beta (\theta -\theta _o)). \end{aligned}$$
(8.6)

A generalization

$$\begin{aligned} \rho \approx \rho _oe^{-\beta (\theta -\theta _o)}\approx \rho _o(1-\beta (\theta -\theta _o))+\cdots \end{aligned}$$
(8.7)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zohdi, T.I. A digital-twin and machine-learning framework for precise heat and energy management of data-centers. Comput Mech 69, 1501–1516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02152-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02152-3

Keywords

Navigation