Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Five-year results of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (transoral outlet reduction) for weight gain after gastric bypass

  • 2019 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The study aim is to determine if patients who have undergone endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (EGJR) maintain weight loss up to 5 years postoperatively.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent EGJR with a full-thickness endoscopic suturing device between April 2009 and June 2018. Percent of excess body weight loss (%EBWL) was calculated using the weight on day of EGJR consult as baseline. The paired t test and McNemar’s test were used to compare weight and comorbidities between preoperative and postoperative time points.

Results

A total of 70 patients regained a mean of 42.8 ± 18.7% of the weight lost after gastric bypass. On day of EGJR consult, average was 116.1 ± 25.2 kg and BMI of 42.3 ± 8.5. Weight loss and %EBWL at follow-up was as follows: 10.7 ± 11.6 kg and 18.5 ± 18.2% at 6 months, 8.5 ± 11.5 kg and 14.9 ± 20.6% at 1 year, 6.9 ± 10.7 kg and 12.2 ± 19.8% at 2 years, 5.3 ± 9.1 kg and 8.7 ± 14.9% at 3 years, 3.1 ± 12.0 kg and 3.2 ± 21.6% at 4 years, and 3.9 ± 13.1 kg and 7.0 ± 23.8% at 5 years. The percentage of patients with obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes did not change over time. Patients who received a pursestring revision or had a greater percent reduction in stoma diameter had more significant %EBWL.

Conclusions

Weight loss after EGJR is sustained up to 5 years after revision with little effect on medical comorbidities. Patients with a greater reduction in stoma diameter experienced superior weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Odom J, Zalesin KC, Washington TL, Miller WW, Hakmeh B, Zaremba DL, Altattan M, Balasubramaniam M, Gibbs DS, Krause KR, Chengelis DL, Franklin BA, McCullough PA (2010) Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 20:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9895-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sjöström L, Lindroos A-K, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H, Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351:2683–2693. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa035622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean APH, MacLean LD (2004) Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 240:416–423 (discussion 423)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah M, Simha V, Garg A (2006) Review: long-term impact of bariatric surgery on body weight, comorbidities, and nutritional status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4223–4231. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hallowell PT, Stellato TA, Yao DA, Robinson A, Schuster MM, Graf KN (2009) Should bariatric revisional surgery be avoided secondary to increased morbidity and mortality? Am J Surg 197:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kellogg TA (2011) Revisional bariatric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 91(1353–71):x. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2011.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, Kroh M, Schauer PR, Brethauer SA (2013) Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg 23:1766–1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1012-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herron DM, Birkett DH, Thompson CC, Bessler M, Swanström LL (2008) Gastric bypass pouch and stoma reduction using a transoral endoscopic anchor placement system: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 22:1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9623-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vargas EJ, Bazerbachi F, Rizk M, Rustagi T, Acosta A, Wilson EB, Wilson T, Neto MG, Zundel N, Mundi MS, Collazo-Clavell ML, Meera S, Abu-Lebdeh HS, Lorentz PA, Grothe KB, Clark MM, Kellogg TA, McKenzie TJ, Kendrick ML, Topazian MD, Gostout CJ, Abu Dayyeh BK (2018) Transoral outlet reduction with full thickness endoscopic suturing for weight regain after gastric bypass: a large multicenter international experience and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:252–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5671-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar N, Thompson CC (2016) Transoral outlet reduction for weight regain after gastric bypass: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 83:776–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel LY, Lapin B, Brown CS, Stringer T, Gitelis ME, Linn JG, Denham WE, Farwell E, Haggerty S, Ujiki MB (2017) Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surg Endosc 31:2667–2677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5281-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hedberg HM, Trenk A, Kuchta K, Linn JG, Carbray J, Ujiki MB (2018) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB. Surg Endosc 32:1564–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6073-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedberg HM, Trenk A, Ujiki MB (2018) Modeling suture patterns for endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision: analyzing a technique to address weight regain after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulman AR, Kumar N, Thompson CC (2018) Transoral outlet reduction: a comparison of purse-string with interrupted stitch technique. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1222–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar N (2016) Weight loss endoscopy: development, applications, and current status. World J Gastroenterol 22:7069–7079. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i31.7069

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary M. Callahan.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Ujiki is a consultant for Olympus, on the Boston Scientific scientific advisory board, a consultant and speaker for Apollo Medical Devices, a speaker for Medtronic, and a speaker for Gore Medical.Dr. Callahan, Dr. Su, Ms. Kuchta, Dr. Linn, and Ms. Carbray have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callahan, Z.M., Su, B., Kuchta, K. et al. Five-year results of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (transoral outlet reduction) for weight gain after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 34, 2164–2171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07003-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07003-6

Keywords

Navigation