Skip to main content
Log in

Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair is widely used to treat bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernias. Recently a self-gripping mesh has been introduced into clinical practice. This mesh does not need staple fixation and thus might reduce the incidence of chronic pain. This prospective study aimed to compare two groups of patients with bilateral (BIH) or monolateral (MIH) primary or recurrent inguinal hernia treated with TAPP using either a self-gripping polyester and polylactic acid mesh (SGM) or a polypropylene and poliglecaprone mesh fixed with four titanium staples [standard technique (ST)].

Methods

In this study, 96 patients (mean age, 58 years) with BIH (73 patients with primary and recurrent hernia) or MIH (22 patients with recurrent hernia) underwent a TAPP repair. For 49 patients, the repairs used SGM, and for 46 patients, ST was used. The patients were clinically evaluated 1 week and then 30 days postoperatively. After at least 6 months, a phone interview was conducted. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire was administered to all the patients at the 6-month follow-up visit.

Results

The mean length of the procedure was 83 min in the SGM group and 77.5 min in the ST group. The mean follow-up period was 13.8 months (range 1.3–42.0 months) for the SGM group and 18.2 months (range 1.9–27.1 months) for the ST group. The recurrence rate at the last follow-up visit was 0 % in the SGM group and 2.2 % (1 patient) in the ST group. The incidence of mild chronic pain at the 6-month follow-up visit was 4.1 % in the SGM group and 9.1 % in the ST group, and the incidence of moderate or severe pain was respectively 2.1 and 6.8 %.

Conclusions

The study population was not large enough to obtain statistically significant results. However, the use of SGM for TAPP repairs appeared to give good results in terms of chronic pain, and the incidence of recurrences was not higher than with ST. In our unit, SGM during TAPP repair of inguinal hernias has become the standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Wara P, Asmussen T, Juul P, Strand L, Andersen FH, Bay-Nielsen M (2011) Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Dan Med Bull 58:C4243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaikh I, Olabi B, Wong VM, Nixon SJ, Kumar S (2011) NICE guidance and current practise of recurrent and bilateral groin hernia repair by Scottish surgeons. Hernia 15:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 97:4–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U, Bittner R (2010) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2,800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 24:3026–3030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2008) Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia: a nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann Surg 247:707–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785

  7. Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 14:490–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmoud Uslu HY, Ustuner EH, Sozener U, Ozis SE, Turkcapar AG (2007) Cannula-site insertion technique prevents incisional hernia in laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor C, Layani L, Liew V, Ghusn M, Crampton N, White S (2007) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation: early results of a large randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22:757–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schopf S, von Ahnen T, von Ahnen M, Schardey H (2011) Chronic pain after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized comparison of light and extralight titanized polypropylene mesh. World J Surg 35:302–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajid MS, Leaver C, Baig MK, Sains P (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 99:29–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brügger L, Bloesch M, Ipaktchi R, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G (2012) Objective hypoesthesia and pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing tissue adhesive versus spiral tacks. Surg Endosc 26:1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fortenly RH, Petter-Puchner AH, May C, Jaksch W, Benesch T, Khakpour Z, Redl H, Glaser KS (2012) The impact of atraumatic fibrin sealant vs staple mesh fixation in TAPP hernia repair on chronic pain and quality of life: results of a randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 26:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL, Yang KH, Zhang YC, Tian JH, Han JX (2011) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25:2849–2858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hynes DM, Stroupe KT, Luo P, Giobbie-Hurder A, Reda D, Kraft M, Itani K, Fitzgibbons R, Jonasson O, Neumayer L (2006) Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh hernia operation: results of a Department of Veterans Affairs randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 203:447–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I, Joachim A, Sandberg S, Koch T, Rülicke T (2009) Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. J Am Coll Surg 208:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosai N, Sutton PA, Evans J, Varghese J (2011) Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair using a novel self-adhesive mesh. J Minim Access Surg 7:192–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford TB (2011) Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg 254:709–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melzack R (1987) The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain 30:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah NR, Mikami DJ, Cook C, Manilchuk A, Hodges C, Memark VR, Volckmann ET, Hall CR, Steinberg S, Needleman B, Hazey JW, Melvin WS, Narula VK (2011) A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 25:2330–2337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR (2012) A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 255:846–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bittner R, Gmähle E, Gmähle B, Schwarz J, Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2010) Lightweight mesh and noninvasive fixation: an effective concept for prevention of chronic pain with laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Surg Endosc 24:2958–2964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kukleta JF, Freytag C, Weber M (2012) Efficiency and safety of mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using n-butyl cyanoacrylate: long-term biocompatibility in over 1,300 mesh fixations. Hernia 16:153–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Massaron S, Bona S, Fumagalli U, Valente P, Rosati R (2008) Long-term sequelae after 1,311 primary inguinal hernia repairs. Hernia 12:57–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikkelsen T, Werner MU, Lassen B, Kehlet H (2004) Pain and sensory dysfunction 6 to 12 months after inguinal herniotomy. Anesth Analg 99:146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Massaron S, Bona S, Fumagalli U, Battafarano F, Elmore U, Rosati R (2007) Analysis of postsurgical pain after inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study of 1,440 operations. Hernia 11:517–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Francesco Puccetti, Ugo Elmore, Simonetta Massaron, and Riccardo Rosati have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uberto Fumagalli Romario.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fumagalli Romario, U., Puccetti, F., Elmore, U. et al. Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Surg Endosc 27, 1798–1802 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2683-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2683-8

Keywords

Navigation