Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptual and instrumental impacts of robotic laparoscopy on surgical performance

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

References

  1. Birkett DH, Josephs LG, Este-McDonald J (1994) A new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc 8: 1448–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cadière GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Germay O, Izizaw R (2001) Nyssen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 15: 918–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter MB, Wesley G, Larson GM (2005) Didactic lecture versus instructional standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship. Am J Surg 189: 243–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan ACW, Chung SCS, Yim APC, Lau JYW, Ng EKW, Li AKC (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11: 438–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crosthwaite G, Chung T, Dunkley P, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1995) Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Brit J Surg 82: 849–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175: 482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dion YM, Gaillard F (1997) Visual integration data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy: Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera system. Surg Endosc 11: 995–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Doyon J, Penhume V, Ungerleider LG (2003) Distinct contributions of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia. 41: 252–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falk V, Mintz D, Grünenfelder J, Fann JL, Burdon TA (2001) Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc 15: 1282–1288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Hahn JF (1998) Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 133: 957–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study on influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351: 248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W (2003) A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 17: 1595–1599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huber JW, Taffinder N, Russell RCG, Darzi A (2003) The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery. Ergonomics 46: 999–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones G (1990) A cognitive perspective on the processes underlying the relationship between stress and performance in sport. In: Jones G, Hardy L, eds. Stress and performance in sport. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1990: 17–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones G, Cale A (1997) Goal difficulty, anxiety and performance. Ergonomics 40: 319–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall RL, Smith JS, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM, Haluck RS, Conney RN (2001) Use of a human patient simulator in the development of resident trauma management skills. J Trauma 51: 17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nio D, Bemelman WA, den Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2001) Efficiency of manual vs robotic (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peitgen K, Walz MV, Holtmann G, Eigler FW (1996) A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pietrabissa A, Scarcello E, Mosca F (1994) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. End Surg 2: 315–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Soper NJ, Damanio RJ, Klingensmith ME (2002) The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183: 702–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Euhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: Better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191: 272–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Servos P (2000) Distance evaluation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Exp Brain Res 130:35–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Taffinder N, Smith SGT, Huber J, Russell RCG, Darzi A (1999) The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13: 1087–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Bergen P, Kunert W, Bessell J, Buess GF (1998) Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 12: 948–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Voorhorst FA, Overbeeke KJ, Smets GJF (1996) Using movement parallax for 3D laparoscopy. Med Prog Technol 21: 211–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the medical students who participated in the study and David Douglas and Olivier Germay for their expert technical assistance. This research was supported by a grant from the National Fund of Scientific Research of Belgium. Equipments were provided by Intuitive Surgical, Ethicon, Storz Endoscope and Essilor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Fund of Scientific Research, Cognitive Ergonomics Laboratory, University of Liège, 5, B32, boulevard du Rectorat, 4000, Liège, Belgium

    Adélaïde Blavier

  2. Department of gastro-intestinal surgery, CHU, St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium

    Quentin Gaudissart & Guy-Bernard Cadière

  3. Cognitive Ergonomics Laboratory, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Anne-Sophie Nyssen

Authors
  1. Adélaïde Blavier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quentin Gaudissart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guy-Bernard Cadière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anne-Sophie Nyssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adélaïde Blavier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blavier, A., Gaudissart, Q., Cadière, GB. et al. Perceptual and instrumental impacts of robotic laparoscopy on surgical performance. Surg Endosc 21, 1875–1882 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9342-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9342-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation