Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Ascending the learning curve

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 October 2004

Abstract

Background

Soon after its introduction, laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) became the procedure of choice in the surgical management of most adrenal tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome and learning curve of the first 100 cases operated by the same surgical team.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 100 consecutive LAs was performed. The parameters studied were indication for surgery, side and length of operation, intra- and postoperative complications, size of tumor, conversion to open surgery, final diagnosis, and length of stay.

Results

Between 1996 and 2002, 100 LAs were performed in 90 patients. The procedures included 45 left, 35 right, and 10 bilateral resections for pheochromocytoma (29), Cushing’s syndrome (27), Conn’s syndrome (16), nonfunctioning adenoma (13), and others (5). Mean tumor size was 4.16 cm (range, 0.3–11). Overall major morbidity occurred in eight patients (9%); there was one mortality due to cerebrovascular accident in an elderly patient. Five cases (5%) were converted to open surgery. The mean length of stay for the whole group was 4.7 days (range, 2–25). In order to assess the learning curve, procedures were divided into three, equal consecutive groups (n = 33, 33, and 34). Intraoperative complications in the intermediate and late groups were significantly less compared to those in the early group (2/33, 2/34, and 7/33, respectively; (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean operating time was significantly reduced between the early (169 min) and both intermediate (116 min) and late (127 min) groups (p < 0.005). The conversion rate was reduced between the three groups (3/33, 2/33, and 0/34), but this was not significant (p = 0.06).

Conclusions

As expected, the outcome of LA is associated with a steep learning curve. According to this study, it seems that performance of approximately 30 cases by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon is required to master the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Barreca Presentil C Renzi G Cavallavo Borrellia FV AStipa (2003) ArticleTitleExpectations and outcomes when moving from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: multivariate analysis. World J Surg 27 223–228 Occurrence Handle12616441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MM Desai IS Gill JH Kauk SF Matin GT Surg EL Bravo (2002) ArticleTitleRobotic assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 60 1104–1107 Occurrence Handle12475680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M Gagner (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Clin North Am 76 523–537

    Google Scholar 

  4. D Hazzan E Shiloni O Jurim D Gross P Reissman (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 15 1356–1358 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnotV2kuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11727150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. IG La QY Duh (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic adrenalectomy—indications and techniques. Surg Oncol 12 105–123 Occurrence Handle12946482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AM Lacy JC Garicia-Valdecasas S Delgado A Castells J Viga (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359 2224–2229 Occurrence Handle12103285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DWH Lee SCS Chung (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic adrenalectomy. Int Surg 80 311–314 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3cbhs10%3D Occurrence Handle8740675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DL Maccabee A Jones J Domreis CW Deveney BC Sheppard (2003) ArticleTitleTransition from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc . .

    Google Scholar 

  9. J Rassweiler A Tsivian AV Kumar C Lymberakis M Schulze O Seen T Frede (2003) ArticleTitleOncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1,000 operations. J Urol 169 2072–2075 Occurrence Handle12771722

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P Reissman S Chen EG Weiss SD Wexner (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve. World J Surg 20 277–282 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900044 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA38rmt1A%3D Occurrence Handle8661831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. SJ Shichman (1999) ArticleTitleLateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. World J Urol 17 48–53 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7psFyrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10096151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O Zmora P Gervaz SD Wexner (2001) ArticleTitleTrocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: myth or concern. Surg Endosc 15 788–793 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksFSjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11443452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Reissman.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-0086-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

David, G., Yoav, M., Gross, D. et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 18, 771–773 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8830-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8830-5

Keywords

Navigation