Skip to main content
Log in

Deep, effortless concentration: re-examining the flow concept and exploring relations with inattention, absorption, and personality

Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conceptualizing the construct of flow in terms of ‘deep and effortless concentration’, we developed two measurement scales designed to index individual differences in flow during ‘internal’ tasks, such as thinking (deep effortless concentration: internal—DECI) and during ‘external’ tasks, such as while playing a sport (deep effortless concentration: external—DECE). These scales were highly correlated, indicating that individuals prone to experiencing flow in external contexts are also prone to experience flow in internal contexts. Nonetheless, a measurement model construing internal and external flow as related, but separate, constructs was found to fit the data significantly better than a model where they were construed as a single construct. We then explored associations between flow and various forms of everyday inattention. In addition, we explored the relation between flow and the Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS), an index of absorption, as well as the Big Five personality traits. Amongst other things, we found that flow was negatively related to inattention, indicating that people who experience flow more frequently may experience relatively less inattention in everyday contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These conditions are often referred to as the ‘flow’, ‘boredom’, and ‘anxiety’ conditions, respectively, but we find that the terms optimal balance, underload, and overload are less ambiguous about the level of skill-challenge balance.

  2. Of the original nine items, three were selected for the flow index. These were “I would love to solve math calculations of that kind again” “I was thrilled” and “Task demands were well matched to my ability”. The same items were also used in the 2016 paper.

  3. For example items from an earlier version of the DFS-2, see Jackson & Marsh, 1996.

  4. See Tellegen & Atkinson, 1974 for some example items.

  5. SFPQ assesses seven facets using one item each (with three subscales to measure flow in different contexts), while the DFS-2 assess nine facets using four items per facet.

  6. Four participants listed the same value for their age and gender (e.g., age = 29, gender = 29), and one participant marked an ‘x’. As gender was not a variable of interest for the present study, no participants were removed from analysis on the basis of gender.

  7. Skew = 0.94. Kurtosis = 0.24.

  8. We ran several previous iterations of this experiment during the development of the items for the internal and external flow scales. Each iteration varied in some way, either with the content of the items, the instructions, or the number of other questionnaires participants were presented with, before we finalized the items and instructions for the present study.

  9. This is considerably more problematic for a trait scale, where individuals could experience each facet in entirely different contexts. For example, a frequent experience of clear goals at work, a frequent loss of self-consciousness while driving, and action-awareness merging while doodling.

References

  • Aherne, C., Moran, A. P., & Lonsdale, C. (2011). The effect of mindfulness training on athletes’ flow: an initial investigation. The Sport Psychologist, 25(2), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). Amos (Version 24.0) (Computer Program). Chicago: IBM SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college students feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carriere, J. S. A., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2008). Everyday attention lapses and memory failures: The affective consequences of mindlessness. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carriere, J. S. A., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body: individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 67(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catley, D.E.L.W.Y.N., & Duda, J.L. (1997). Psychological antecedents of the frequency and intensity of flow in golfers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28(4), 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cermakova, L., Moneta, G.B., & Spada, M.M. (2010). Dispositional flow as a mediator of the relationships between attentional control and approaches to studying during academic examination preparation. Educational Psychology, 30(5), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne, J. A., Carriere, J.S.A., & Smilek, D. (2006). Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 2, 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, H. J., Brown, A. M., & Moon, C. E. (1993). Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(4), 534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crust, L., & Swann, C. (2013). The relationship between mental toughness and dispositional flow. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(2), 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the Holistic Approach to Behaviour. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The Stream of Consciousness (pp. 335–358). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1975).

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2010). Effortless attention in everyday life: A systematic phenomenology. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: a new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 179–190). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Manzano, Ö, Cervenka, S., Jucaite, A., Hellenäs, O., Farde, L., & Ullén, F. (2013). Individual differences in the proneness to have flow experiences are linked to dopamine D2-receptor availability in the dorsal striatum. Neuroimage, 67, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2014). Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional flow scale-2. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. (1988). The relationship between life satisfaction and flow in elderly Korean immigrants. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 138–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, Y. N. (2008). Combat flow: military, political, and ethical dimensions of subjective well-being in war. Review of General Psychology, 12(3), 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmat, L., de Manzano, Ö, Theorell, T., Högman, L., Fischer, H., & Ullén, F. (2015). Physiological correlates of the flow experience during computer game playing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 97(1), 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, R. (2013). The psychology of fatigue: work, effort and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: the flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Ford, S. K., Kimiecik, J. C., & Marsh, H. W. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport and exercise Psychology, 20(4), 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Thomas, P. R., Marsh, H. W., & Smethurst, C. J. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Ringelhan, S., & Blomann, F. (2011). Does skills–demands compatibility result in intrinsic motivation? Experimental test of a basic notion proposed in the theory of flow experiences. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P., Miele, D. B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). The cognitive antecedents and motivational consequences of the feeling of being in the zone. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 48–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (2011). Tellegen Absorption Scale. https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~jfkihlstrom/TAS.htm. Accessed 4 June 2018

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landhäußer, A., & Keller, J. (2012). Flow and its affective, cognitive, and performance-related consequences. In Advances in flow research (pp. 65–85). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2005). The relationship of motivation and flow experience to academic procrastination in university students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(1), 5–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, D. J. (2014). The organized mind: Thinking straight in the age of information overload. Penguin.

  • Macbeth, J. (1988). Ocean cruising. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 214–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining ‘short’ and ‘core’ flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marty-Dugas, J., Ralph, B. C. W., Oakman, J. M., & Smilek, D. (2018). The relation between smartphone use and everyday inattention. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. A. (2013). Propensity for experiencing flow: The roles of cognitive flexibility and mindfulness. The Humanistic Psychologist, 41(4), 319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosing, M. A., Magnusson, P. K., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., Madison, G., & Ullén, F. (2012). Heritability of proneness for psychological flow experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 699–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadon, R., Hoyt, I. P., Register, P. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1991). Absorption and hypnotizability: Context effects reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, M. A., Harwood, C., & Anderson, R. (2011). Pre-competition imagery and music: the impact on flow and performance in competitive soccer. The Sport Psychologist, 25(2), 212–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pates, J., Karageorghis, C. I., Fryer, R., & Maynard, I. (2003). Effects of asynchronous music on flow states and shooting performance among netball players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peifer, C., Schulz, A., Schächinger, H., Baumann, N., & Antoni, C. H. (2014). The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress—can u shape it? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, B. C. (2017). Media multitasking and performance on attentionally demanding tasks (Doctoral Thesis). https://uwspace.fuwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/12098. Accessed 4 April 2018.

  • Ralph, B. C., Seli, P., Wilson, K. E., & Smilek, D. (2018) Volitional media multitasking: Awareness of performance costs and modulation of media multitasking as a function of task demand. Psychological Research (under review).

  • Ralph, B. C., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2014). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(5), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J.C. (1962). Advanced progressive matrices. Set II. London: H. K. Lewis & Co. Distributed in the USA by The Psychological Corporation. San Antonio. Texas.

  • Raven, J.C. (1965). Advanced Progressive Matrices. Sets I and II. London: H. K. Lewis & Co. Distributed in the USA by The Psychological Corporation. San Antonio, Texas.

  • Ross, S. R., & Keiser, H. N. (2014). Autotelic personality through a five-factor lens: individual differences in flow-propensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, I. (1988). Bosozoku: flow in Japanese motorcycle gangs. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 92–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Carriere, J., & Smilek, D. (2015). Not all mind wandering is created equal: dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79(5), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0617-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016). Assessing the associations among trait and state levels of deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sirois, F. M. (2014). Absorbed in the moment? An investigation of procrastination, absorption and cognitive failures. Personality and individual differences, 71, 30–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Out of mind, out of sight: eye blinking as in-dicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science, 21(6), 786–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyser, C. H., & Baron, D. A. (1993). Hypnotizability, absorption, and subscales of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical population. Dissociation: Progress in the Dissociative Disorders, 6(1), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, N. A., Jackson, S. A., Zervas, Y., & Karteroliotis, K. (2007). Flow experience and athletes’ performance with reference to the orthogonal model of flow. The Sport Psychologist, 21(4), 438–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, C. (2016). Flow in Sport. In L. Harmat, F. O. Anderson, F. Ullén, J. Wright & G. Sadlo (Eds.), Flow Experience (pp. 51–64). Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, C., Keegan, R. J., Piggott, D., & Crust, L. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 807–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1992). Note on structure and meaning of the MPQ Absorption scale. University of Minnesota (Un-published manuscript).

  • Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of abnormal psychology, 83(3), 268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ullén, F., de Manzano, Ö, Almeida, R., Magnusson, P. K., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., Madison, G. (2012). Proneness for psychological flow in everyday life: Associations with personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullén, F., de Manzano, Ö, Theorell, T., & Harmat, L. (2010). 10 The physiology of effortless attention: correlates of state flow and flow proneness. Effortless attention: a new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action, p. 205.

  • Ullén, F., Harmat, L., Theorell, T., & Madison, G. (2016). Flow and individual differences—a phenotypic analysis of data from more than 10,000 twin individuals. In L. Harmat, F. O. Anderson, F. Ullén, J. Wright & G. Sadlo (Eds.), Flow experience (pp. 267–288). Springer International Publishing.

  • Ulrich, M., Keller, J., & Grön, G. (2016). Neural signatures of experimentally induced flow experiences identified in a typical fMRI block design with BOLD imaging. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 11(3), 496–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., Waller, C., & Grön, G. (2014). Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences. Neuroimage, 86, 194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Irwin, M., Cooper, C., & Srivastava, J. (2015). Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 102–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. J., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). Challenge-skills and mindfulness: an exploration of the conundrum of flow process. OTJR: Occupation, participation and health, 26(1), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. J., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2007). Further explorations into the conundrum of flow process. Journal of Occupational Science, 14(3), 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Erik Woody for his helpful and insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper. As well, we wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions on our manuscript. This research was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) discovery grant awarded to Daniel Smilek, a Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology awarded to Jeremy Marty-Dugas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Marty-Dugas.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The data generated and analyzed for the current study are available online in the database Open ICPSR. The title is Deep, Effortless Concentration: Re-examining the Flow Concept and exploring relations with Inattention, Absorption, and Personality—September 2017, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. The persistent link for this data is https://doi.org/10.3886/E100982V1. The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marty-Dugas, J., Smilek, D. Deep, effortless concentration: re-examining the flow concept and exploring relations with inattention, absorption, and personality. Psychological Research 83, 1760–1777 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1031-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1031-6

Navigation