Skip to main content
Log in

The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society: current trials and results

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This article provides an overview of current and completed multicentre trials and systematic reviews performed by the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC).

Background

The SDGC aims to transfer the concept of evidence-based medicine to surgery by planning, conducting and analyzing large national and international randomized multicentre trials concerning surgical issues. Every German surgeon may ask the SDGC for support to realize his clinical trial ideas. Another important task of the SDGC is the acquisition of trial funding from government institutions or industrial partners.

Discussion

Five multicentre randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 11 systematic reviews with meta-analyses have already been completed and published by the SDGC. Another seven RCTs are currently in the recruitment or follow up phase. A total of 2,500 patients in over 100 trial centres have participated so far.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/OperationenProzeduren5231401107014,property=file.pdf; Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik). Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern—Ausführliche Darstellung—2010; Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden 2011

  2. Gluud C, Nikolova D (2007) Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years. Trials 8:7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wente MN, Seiler CM, Uhl W, Buechler MW (2003) Perspectives of evidence-based surgery. Dig Surg 20:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Howes N, Chagla L, Thorpe M, McCulloch P (1997) Surgical practice is evidence based. Br J Surg 84:1220–1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Solomon MJ, Laxamana A, Devore L, McLeod RS (1994) Randomized controlled trials in surgery. Surgery 115:707–712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, the Balliol Collaboration (2009) Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 374(9695):1097–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT Group (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148(4):295–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu X, Wright JG, McLeod RS et al (1996) Observational studies as alternatives to randomized clinical trials in surgical clinical research. Surgery 119:473–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fink C, Keck T, Rossion I, Weitz J, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Knebel P (2011) Contribution of the Study Center of the German Surgical Society to evidence based surgery. Chirurg 82(12):1109–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, Franck A, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP (2009) Interrupted or continuously slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 249:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Burns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Keser M, Büchler MW (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seiler CM, Frohlich BE, Veit JA, Gazyakan E, Wente MN, Wollermann C, Deckert A, Witte S, Victor N, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP (2006) Protocol design and current status of CLIVIT: a randomized controlled multicenter relevance trial comparing clips versus ligatures in thyroid surgery. Trials 7:27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlosser K, Veit JA, Witte S, Fernandes ED, Victor N, Knaebel HP, Seiler CM, Rothmund M (2007) Comparison of total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation and without thymectomy versus total parathyroidectomy with autotransplant and with thymectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism: TOPAR PILOT-Trial. Trials 8:22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Löffler T, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kijak T, Thomusch O, Hodina R, Kruger M, Simon T, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Hand-suture versus stapling for closure of loop ileostomy: HASTA-Trial: a study rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 12:34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heger U, Voss S, Knebel P, Doerr-Harim C, Neudecker J, Schuhmacher C, Faist E, Diener MK, Kieser M, Seiler CM, Büchler MW (2011) Prevention of abdominal wound infection (PROUD trial, DRKS00000390): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 12:245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Diener MK, Bruckner T, Contin P, Halloran C, Glanemann M, Schlitt HJ, Mössner J, Kieser M, Werner J, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) ChroPac-trial: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Trial protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Trials 11:47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92(5):539–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Diener MK, Simon T, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2011) Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer-methods of clinical research in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg [Epub ahead of print]

  19. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Antes G (2007) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgery. Chirurg 78:938–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Büchler MW, Diener MK, Weitz J (2011) Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency! Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(7):937–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diener MK, Wolff RF, von Elm E, Rahbari NN, Mavergames C, Knaebel HP, Seiler CM, Antes G (2009) Can decision making in general surgery be based on evidence? An empirical study of Cochrane Reviews. Surgery 146:444–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251:843–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rahbari NN, Aigner M, Thorlund K, Mollberg N, Motschall E, Jensen K, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Koch M, Weitz J (2010) Meta analysis shows that detection of circulating tumor calls indicates poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138:1714–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Büchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meat-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhabari NN, Koch M, Mehrabi A, Weidmann K, Motschall E, Kahlert C, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2009) Portal triad clamping vs. vascular exclusion for vascular control during hepatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Diener MK, Firzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel HP, Büchler MW (2011) Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006053

  27. Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(1):41–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92:539–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rahbari NN, Wente MN, Schemmer P, Diener MK, Hoffmann K, Motschall E, Schmidt J, Weitz J, Büchler MW (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of portal triad clamping on outcome after hepatic resection. Br J Surg 95:424–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Firess H (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94:265–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fitzmaurice C, Seiler CM, Büchler MW, Diener MK (2010) Survival, mortality and quality of life after pylorus-preserving or classical Whipple operation. A systematic review with meta-analysis. Chirurg 81:454–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rahbari NN, Diener MK, Fischer L, Wente MN, Kienle P, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2008) A concept for trial institutions focussing on randomised controlled trials in surgery. Trials 9:3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus W. Büchler.

Additional information

Phillip Knebel and Shafreena Kühn contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knebel, P., Kühn, S., Ulrich, A.B. et al. The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society: current trials and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397, 611–618 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0922-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0922-z

Keywords

Navigation