Skip to main content
Log in

Voxel model of a rabbit: assessment of absorbed doses in organs after CT examination performed by two different protocols

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this work was to assess absorbed doses in organs and tissues of a rabbit, following computed tomography (CT) examinations, using a dedicated 3D voxel model. Absorbed doses in relevant organs were calculated using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo software. Calculations were perfomed for two standard CT protocols, using tube voltages of 110 kVp and 130 kVp. Absorbed doses were calculated in 11 organs and tissues, i.e., skin, bones, brain, muscles, heart, lungs, liver, spleen, kidney, testicles, and fat tissue. The doses ranged from 15.3 to 28.3 mGy, and from 40.2 to 74.3 mGy, in the two investigated protocols. The organs that received the highest dose were bones and kidneys. In contrast, brain and spleen were organs that received the smallest doses. Doses in organs which are stretched along the body did not change significantly with distance. On the other hand, doses in organs which are localized in the body showed maximums and minimums. Using the voxel model, it is possible to calculate the dose distribution in the rabbit’s body after CT scans, and study the potential biological effects of CT doses in certain organs. The voxel model presented in this work can be used to calculated doses in all radiation experiments in which rabbits are used as experimental animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

source photon as calculated with MCNP5 for various positions along the rabbit axis for 110 kVp (upper panel) and 130 kVp (lower panel). Distance was measured from the coordinate origin (see Fig. 1A)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ay MR, Zaidi H (2005) Development and validation of MCNP4C-based Monte Carlo simulator for fan- and cone-beam X-ray CT. Phys Med Biol 50:4863–4885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazalova M, Verhaegen F (2007) Monte Carlo simulation of a computed tomography X-ray tube. Phys Med Biol 52:5945–5955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BEIR (2006) Committee on the biological effects of ionizing radiation VII, phase 2, health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation

  • Caffrey EA, Johansen MP, Higley KA (2016) Voxel modeling of rabbits for use in radiological dose rate calculations. J Environ Radioact 151:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Kolditz D, Beister M, Bohle R, Kalender WA (2012) Fast on-site Monte Carlo tool for dose calculations in CT applications. Med Phys 39:2985–2996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco JJ, Cagnon CH, Cody DD, Stevens DM et al (2007) Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose. Phys Med Biol 52:2583–2597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mattos R, Ruby J, Van Hatten RA, Thompson M (2015) Computed tomographic features of clinical and subclinical middle ear disease in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus): 88 cases 2007–2014. Am Vet Med Assoc 246:336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deak P, van Straten M, Shrimpton PC, Zankl M, Kalender WA (2008) Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 18:759–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogdas B, Stout D, Chatziioannou AF, Leahy RM (2007) Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data. Phys Med Biol 52:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drees R, Francois CJ, Saunders JH (2014) Invited review—computed tomographic angiography (CTa) of the thoracic cardiovascular system in companion animals. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 55:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman KF, Cristy M, Ryman JC (1996) The ORNL mathematical phantom series, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report. Oak Ridge, TN, USA

  • Eken E, Çorumluoglu Ö, Paksoy Y, Besoluk K, Kalayci I (2009) A study on evaluation of 3D virtual rabbit kidney models by multidetector computed tomography images. Anatomy 3:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualdrini G, Ferrari P (2010) A review of voxel model development and radiation protection applications at ENEA. Radiat Prot Dosim 140:383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Lee MS, Kim JH et al (2019) Preclinical voxel-based dosimetry through GATE Monte Carlo simulation using PET/CT imaging of mice. Phys Med Biol 64:095007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICRP 110 (2009) Adult reference computational phantoms. ICRP publication 110 Ann. ICRP 39 3-5. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. Elsevier

  • ICRP 145 (2020) Adult mesh-type reference computational phantoms. ICRP Publication 145 Ann. ICRP 49(3)

  • Kinase S (2008) Voxel-based frog phantom for internal dose evaluation. J Nucl Sci Technol 45:1049–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnenberg WM, Bijster M, de Jong KPE, M, (2004) A stylized computational model of the rat for organ dosimetry in support of preclinical evaluations of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y, 111In or 177Lu. J Nuc Med 45:1260–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer R, Vieira JW, Khoury HJ, Lima FR, Fuelle D (2003) All about MAX: a male adult voxel phantom for Monte Carlo calculations in radiation protection dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 48:1239–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krstic D, Nikezic D (2007) Input files with ORNL-mathematical phantoms of the human body for MCNP-4B. Comp Phys Commun 76:33–37

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Williams JL, Lee C, Bolch WE (2005) The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients. Med Phys 32:3537–3548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lodwick D, Hurtado J, Pafundi D, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2010) The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 55:339–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Samei E, Segars WP et al (2011) Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. Development and validation of a Monte Carlo program. Med Phys 38:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, McGale P, Cain TM, Dowty JG, Bickerstafe AC, Darby SC (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrović M, Tatalović N, Nikolić-Kokić A, Ciraj-Bjelac O et al (2018) Influence of absorbed radiation dose following computed tomography on the antioxidative status in rabbit testicles. Arch Biol Sci 70:675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte Carlo Team (2003) MCNP—a general Monte Carlo N-particle transport code, version 5 vol I: overview and theory. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory; LA-UR-03-198

  • Müllhaupt D, Wenger S, Kircher P, Pfammatter N, Hatt J-M, Ohlerth S (2017) Computed tomography of the thorax in rabbits: a prospective study in ten clinically healthy New Zealand white rabbits. Acta Vet Scand. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0340-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkadif S, Eken E (2013) Three-dimensional reconstruction of multidetector computed tomography images of paranasal sinuses of New Zealand rabbits. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 37:675–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de González A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto PHR, Vieira JW, Yoriyaz H, Lima FRA (2008) Photon and electron absorbed fractions calculated from a new tomographic rat model. Phys Med Biol 53:5343–5355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehani MM, Yang K, Melick ER, Heil J, Šalát D, Sensakovic WF, Liu B (2019) Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DWO (2006) Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics. Phys Med Biol 51:R287–R301

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rühm W, Harrison RM (2020) High CT doses return to the agenda. Radiat Environ Biophys 59:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sing S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M (2011) CT radiation dose reduction by modifying primary factors. J Am Coll Radiol 8:369–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stabin MG, Peterson TE, Holburn GE, Emmons MA (2006) Voxel-based mouse and rat models for internal dose calculations. J Nucl Med 47:655–659

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (2008) Report. United Nations. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Volume I: sources; volume II: effects. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 2008 Report. United Nations Sales Publications E.10.XI.3 (2010) and E.11.IX.3 (2011). United Nations, New York

  • Van Caelenberg IA, De Rycke LM, Hermans K, Verhaert L, van Bree HJ, Gielen IM (2010) PhD Computed tomography and cross-sectional anatomy of the head in healthy rabbits. AJVR 71(3):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhove C, Bankstahl JP, Krämer SD, Visser E, Belcari N, Vandenberghe S (2015) Accurate molecular imaging of small animals taking into account animal models, handling, anaesthesia, quality control and imaging system performance. EJNMMI Phys 2:31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeom YS, Choi C, Han H et al (2019) Dose coefficients of mesh-type ICRP reference computational phantoms for idealized external exposures of photons and electrons. Nucl Eng Technol 51:843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeom YS, Choi C, Han H, Choi C, Shin B, Kim CH, Lee C (2020a) Dose coefficients of percentile specific computational phantoms for photon external exposures. Radiat Environ Biophys 59:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeom YS, Choi C, Han H, Shin B, Nguyen TT, Han MC, Kim CH, Lee C (2020b) Dose coefficients of mesh-type ICRP reference computational phantoms for external exposures of neutrons, protons, and helium Ions. Nucl Eng Technol 52:1545–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Liu X, Leng S et al (2009) Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 1:65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi H, Ay MR (2007) Current status and new horizons in Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray CT scanners. Med Bio Eng Comput 45:809–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development (Agreement no. 451-03-9/2021-14/200122 and 451-03-9/2021-14/200143).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Nikezic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical standards

The study was conducted in line with existing ethical normatives and based on the Permission of the Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection—Veterinary Directorate, Republic of Serbia No. 323-07-03455/2015-05/5.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitrovic, M., Ciraj-Bjelac, O., Jovanovic, Z. et al. Voxel model of a rabbit: assessment of absorbed doses in organs after CT examination performed by two different protocols. Radiat Environ Biophys 60, 631–638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00941-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00941-7

Keywords

Navigation