Skip to main content
Log in

Objective assessment of the reliability of the House–Brackmann and Fisch grading of synkinesis

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to assess synkinesis associated with post paretic voluntary facial movements using the objective OSCAR method and to investigate the correlation between synkinesis and paresis to compare the objective results with the subjective scaling systems of Fisch and House–Brackmann. The development of an objective assessment of synkinesis with the OSCAR method is focused on the clinically most relevant eye-mouth and forehead-mouth synkinetic movements. Thirteen patients with unilateral facial paralysis and synkinesis of the University Hospital Zurich were examined. Two types of clinically relevant facial synkinesis were found: a maximal synkinesis and a relative synkinesis. Neither Synkinesis-Index correlates well with the underlying degree of global facial palsy. The relative Synkinesis-Index (rSI) correlates well with the subjective evaluation of synkinesis according to the Fisch Grading, but shows a poor correlation with the traditional House–Brackmann grading. Therefore a single scaling index combining the degree of facial nerve palsy and synkinesis is inappropriate and we propose the use of two independent scaling systems for the evaluation of facial palsy: one for the voluntary facial movements, the other for the involuntary synkinetic movements. The adequate evaluation of the post paretic face should include the results of both scaling systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. House JW (1983) Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope 93:1056–1069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:146–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rickenmann J, Jaquenod C, Cerenko D, Fisch U (1997) Comparative value of facial nerve grading systems. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:322–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisch U (1981) Surgery for bells palsy. Arch Otolaryngol 107:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yanagihara N (1977) Classification and standardized documentation of surgical results. In: Fisch U (ed) Facial nerve surgery. Proceedings of the third international symposium on facial nerve surgery; Zurich, Switzerland, 1976. Kugler Medical, Amstelveen, pp 533–536

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coulson SE, Croxson GR (1995) Assessing physiotherapy rehabilitation outcomes following facial nerve paralysis. Aust J Otolaryngol 2(1):20–24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM (1996) Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114(3):380–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neely JG, Cherian NG, Dickerson CB, Nedzelski JM (2010) Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope 120(5):1038–1045

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallati V, Scriba H (1994) Computer assisted facial nerve grading. 1st International Skull Base Congress, Hannover, 1992. In: Samij MS (ed) Skull base surgery, Karger, pp 1211–1213

  10. Gallati V, Scriba H (1994) Computer analysis of facial movements. In: VII International Symposium on the Facial Nerve, Köln, 1992. Europ Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol, Suppl, pp 187–188

  11. Scriba H, Meier-Gallati V, Pollak A, Scherler M, Fisch U (1995) Objective evaluation of facial function. In: Proceedings of 4th international muscle symposium, Zurich, pp 172–174

  12. Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H, Fisch U (1998) Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR). Otol Head Neck Surg 118:545–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H (2000) Validation of objective measure of facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 10(1):177–178

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burres SA (1985) Facial biomechanics: the standards of normal. Laryngoscope 95:708–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burres S, Fisch U (1986) The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:755–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frey M, Jenny A, Giovanoli P, Stüssi E (1994) Development of a new documentation system for facial movements as a basis for the international registry for neuromuscular reconstruction in the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1334–1349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Isono M, Murata K, Tanaka H, Kawamoto M, Azuma H (1996) An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:27–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuzon WM, Marcus JR, Johnson PJ (1995) A comparison of methods for the quantification of facial movements. In: Proceedings of 4th international muscle symposium, Zurich, pp 179–181

  19. Neely JG, Cheung JY, Wood M, Byers J, Rogerson A (1992) Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face. Am J Otol 13:97–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moran CJ, Neely JG (1996) Patterns of facial nerve synkinesis. Laryngoscope 106:1491–1496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Prof. Ugo Fisch for the fruitful discussions, the enormous support and the review of this paper. We thank the patient for his informed consent to publish the photographs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verena Meier-Gallati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Verena Meier-Gallati declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Henning Scriba declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meier-Gallati, V., Scriba, H. Objective assessment of the reliability of the House–Brackmann and Fisch grading of synkinesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 4217–4223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4770-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4770-x

Keywords

Navigation