Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Post-operative wound infection in salvage laryngectomy: does antibiotic prophylaxis have an impact?

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salvage laryngectomy carries a high risk of post-operative infection with reported rates of 40–61%. The purpose of this study was to analyse infections in our own patients and review the potential impact of our current antibiotic prophylaxis (AP). A retrospective analysis of infection in 26 consecutive patients between 2000 and 2010 undergoing salvage total laryngectomy (SL) following recurrent laryngeal cancer after failed radiotherapy or chemo-radiation was undertaken. The antibiotic prophylaxis was intravenous teicoplanin, cefuroxime and metronidazole at induction and for the following 24 h. Infection was defined by Tabet and Johnson’s grade 5, categorized as pharyngocutaneous fistula. Fifteen patients (58%) developed a post-operative wound infection, which occurred on average at 12 days after surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated three risk variables that had a significant correlation with infection: alcohol consumption (p = 0.01), cN stage of tumour (p < 0.01), and pre-operative albumin levels <3.2 g/L (p = 0.012). There was a trend, though not significant, for increased infection in patients with high or low BMIs. The most common organisms isolated from clinical samples from infected patients were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA (43%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36%), Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis (7% each). All these organisms are typical hospital-acquired pathogens. Pseudomonas and Serratia were not covered by the prophylactic regime we used. The current antibiotic regime following SL is inadequate as the rate of infection is high. It would therefore seem logical to trial a separate antibiotic protocol of AP for patients undergoing SL that would include an extended course of antibiotics after the standard prophylaxis. In addition, infection rates may also be reduced by improving the metabolic state of patients pre-operatively by multi-disciplinary action. Steps should also be taken to reduce cross-infection with nosocomial pathogens in these patients. Other aspects of surgical management should be also taken in consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murdoch DA, Telfer MR, Irvine GH (1993) Audit of antibiotic policy and wound infection in neck surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:167–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabet JC, Johnson JT (1990) Wound-infection in head and neck-surgery—prophylaxis, etiology and management. J Otolaryngol 19:197–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scher KS, Bernstein JM, Arenstein GL, Sorensen C (1990) Reducing the cost of surgical prophylaxis. Am Surg 56:32–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogihara H, Takeuchi K, Majima Y (2009) Risk factors of post-operative infection in head and neck surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 36:457–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grandis JR, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Yu VL, Damico F (1992) Post-operative wound-infection—a poor prognostic sign for patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer 70:2166–2170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simo R, French G (2006) The use of prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck oncological surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 14:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber RS, Callender DL (1992) Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 155:16–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Swift AC (1988) Wound sepsis, chemoprophylaxis and major head and neck-surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 13:81–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Penel N, Fournier C, Lefebvre D, Lefebvre JL (2005) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for wound infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma surgery with opening of mucosa. Study of 260 surgical procedures. Oral Oncol 41:294–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Penel N, Lefebvre D, Fournier C, Sarini J, Kara A, Lefebvre JL (2001) Risk factors for wound infection in head and neck cancer surgery: a prospective study. Head Neck 23(6):447–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker GD, Parell GJ (1979) Cefazolin prophylaxis in head and neck-cancer surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 88:183–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2008) Publication number 104: antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery: a national clinical guideline. Health Improv Scotl http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign104.pdf

  13. Velanovich V (1991) A metanalysis of prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck-surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:429–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sassler AM, Esclamado RM, Wolf GT (1995) Surgery after organ preservation therapy—analysis of wound complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:162–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sundaram K, Wasserman JM (2009) Prevention of unplanned pharyngocutaneous fistula in salvage laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:645–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Girod DA, McCulloch TM, Tsue TT, Weymuller EA (1995) Risk-factors for complications in clean-contaminated head and neck surgical procedures. Head Neck 17(1):7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Robbins KT, Favrot S, Hanna D, Cole R (1990) Risk of wound infection in patients with head and neck-cancer. Head Neck 12(2):143–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penel N, Fournier C, Lefebvre D, Roussel-DelVallez M, Sarini J, Kara A, Mallet Y, Lefebvre JL (2004) Previous chemotherapy as a predictor of wound infections in nonmajor head and neck surgery: results of a prospective study. Head Neck 26(6):513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson JT, Bloomer WD (1989) Effect of prior radiotherapy on postsurgical wound-infection. Head Neck 11(2):132–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown BM, Johnson JT, Wagner RL (1987) Etiologic factors in head and neck wound infections. Laryngoscope 97:587–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson JT, Myers EN, Sigler BA, Thearle PB, Schramm VL (1984) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for contaminated head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 94:46–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weber RS, Berkey BA, Forastiere A, Cooper J, Maor M, Goepfert H, Morrison W, Glisson B, Trotti A, Ridge JA, Chao KSC, Peters G, Lee DJ, Leaf A, Ensley J (2003) Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy following organ preservation therapy—The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 91–11. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wakisaka N, Murono S, Kondo S, Furukawa M, Yoshizaki T (2008) Post-operative pharyngocutaneous fistula after laryngectomy. Auris Nasus Larynx 35:203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Furuta Y, Homma A, Oridate N, Suzuki F, Hatakeyama H, Suzuki K, Nishioka T, Shirato H, Fukuda S (2008) Surgical complications of salvage total laryngectomy following concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 13:521–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sassler AM, Esclamado RM, Wolf GT (1995) Surgery after organ preservation therapy: analysis of wound complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:162–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan JE, Breau RL, Suen JY, Hanna EY (2007) Surgical wound complications after intensive chemo-radiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bieri S, Bentzen SM, Huguenin P, Allal AS, Cozzi L et al (2003) Early morbidity after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer. Experience from four nonrandomized studies. Strahlenther Onkol 179(6):390–395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lavertu P, Bonafede JP, Adelstein DJ et al (1998) Comparison of surgical complications after organ-preservation therapy in patients with stage III or IV squamous cell head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:401–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pang L, Jeannon JP, Simo R (2011) Minimizing complications in salvage head and neck oncological surgery following radiotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(2):125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fee WE, Glenn M, Handen C, Hopp ML (1984) One day vs 2 days of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing major head and neck-surgery. Laryngoscope 94:612–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson JT, Yu VL, Myers EN, Wagner RL (1987) An assessment of the need for gram-negative bacterial coverage in antibiotic-prophylaxis for oncological head and neck-surgery. J Infect Dis 155:331–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Avery CM, Ameerally P et al (2006) Infection of surgical wounds in the maxillofacial region and free flap donor sites with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(3):217–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Piccart M, Dor P, Klastersky J (1983) Antimicrobial prophylaxis of infections in head and neck cancer surgery. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 39:92–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jeannon JP, Orabi A, Manganaris A, Simo R (2010) Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection as a causative agent of fistula formation following total laryngectomy for advanced head and cancer. Head Neck Oncol 2:14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Neurosciences Foundation Programme, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK

    William Scotton

  2. Academic Surgical Foundation Programme, St George’s Hospital Blackshaw Road Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK

    Richard Cobb

  3. Head and Neck Unit, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    Leo Pang, Iain Nixon, Anil Joshi, Jeanne-Pierre Jeannon, Richard Oakley & Ricard Simo

  4. Department of Infection, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    Gary French & Carolyn Hemsley

  5. 5 Stone Street, Cambridge, CB1 2PL, UK

    William Scotton

Authors
  1. William Scotton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Cobb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leo Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Iain Nixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anil Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jeanne-Pierre Jeannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Richard Oakley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gary French
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carolyn Hemsley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ricard Simo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Scotton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scotton, W., Cobb, R., Pang, L. et al. Post-operative wound infection in salvage laryngectomy: does antibiotic prophylaxis have an impact?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 2415–2422 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1932-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1932-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation