Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of clinical and perinatal outcomes in early- and late-onset preeclampsia

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical and laboratory findings and maternal–perinatal outcomes between women with early-onset preeclampsia (EO-PE) and late-onset preeclampsia (LO-PE).

Methods

One hundred and fifty-four women with preeclampsia (PE) who delivered in our clinic were included in the study. Perinatal and obstetric outcomes were evaluated.

Results

The incidence of abnormal uterine artery (UtA) velocity waveform was significantly higher in the EO-PE group (71.4 vs 30.1 %) (p < 0.001). The incidences of small-for-gestational age, oligohydramnios, Apgar score <7 at 5 min, stillbirth and early neonatal death rates were significantly higher in women with EO-PE compared to LO-PE (p < 0.01). Maternal complications were only recorded in women with severe PE.

Conclusion

EO-PE, especially with abnormal UtA Doppler findings defines a placentation abnormality with higher perinatal adverse outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R (2010) Preeclampsia. Lancet 376:631–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts JM, Cooper DW (2001) Pathogenesis and genetics of preeclampsia. Lancet 357:53–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice (2002) ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Von Dadelszen P, Magee LA, Roberts JM (2003) Subclassification of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregn 22:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Gadgliardi G, Novelli GP (2008) Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease. Hypertension 52:873–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paruk F, Moodley J (2000) Maternal and neonatal outcome in early- and late-onset pre eclampsia. Semin Neonatol 5:197–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aksornphusitaphong A, Phupong V (2013) Risk factors of early and late onset preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(3):627–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdel-Hady ES, Fawzy M, El-Negri M, Nezar M, Ragab A, Helal AS (2010) Is expectant management of early-onset severe preeclampsia worthwhile in low-resource settings? Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stergiotou I, Crispi F, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Bijnens B, Gratacos E (2013) Patterns of maternal vascular remodeling and responsiveness in early- versus late-onset preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:558.e1–558.e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huppertz B (2008) Placental origins of preeclampsia: challenging the current hypothesis. Hypertension 51:970–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson DB, Ziadie MS, McIntire DD, Rogers BB, Leveno KJ (2014) Placental pathology suggesting that preeclampsia is more than one disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:66.e1–66.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez O, Figueras S, Fernandez S, Bennasar M, Martines JM, Puerto B, Gratacos E (2008) Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:128–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tuffnell DJ, Shennan AH, Waugh JJS, Walker JJ (2006) The management of severe preeclampsia/eclampsia, guideline number 10(A). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duley L (2009) The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 33:130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner JA (2010) Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update. Int J Women Health 2:327–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Madazli R, Budak E, Calay Z, Aksu MF (2000) Correlation between placental bed biopsy findings, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) and fibronectin levels in preeclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107:514–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aardema MW, Oosterhof H, Timmer A, van Rooy I, Aarnoudse JG (2001) Uterine artery Doppler flow and uteroplacental vascular pathology in normal pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age fetuses. Placenta 22:405–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meler E, Figueras F, Mula R, Crispi F, Benassar M, Gomez O, Gratacos E (2010) Prognostic role of uterine artery Doppler in patients with preeclampsia. Fetal Diagn Ther 27:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sibai BM (2008) Maternal and uteroplacental hemodynamics for the classification and prediction of preeclampsia. Hypertension 52:805–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. James JL, Whitley GS, Cartwright E (2010) Pre-eclampsia: fitting together the placental, immune and cardiovascular pieces. J Pathol 221:363–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riza Madazli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madazli, R., Yuksel, M.A., Imamoglu, M. et al. Comparison of clinical and perinatal outcomes in early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 53–57 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3176-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3176-x

Keywords

Navigation