Skip to main content
Log in

The mode of delivery in patients with preeclampsia at term subject to elective or emergency Cesarean section

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Preeclampsia is accompanied by high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Thus, delivery needs to be planned carefully. The aim of this study was to determine the most favorable delivery for patients with preeclampsia between the week 37 and 41 of gestation.

Methods

For this retrospective study, patient data from 2003 to 2011 was collected. Study participants were women having a Cesarean section during week 37 and 41 of gestation. The population was classified into four groups: patients without hypertensive disorders having an elective or emergency Cesarean section and patients suffering from preeclampsia with elective or emergency Cesarean section. Analysis included mode of delivery and neonatal outcome, defined by Apgar score, rate of NICU admission and pH value of the umbilical cord.

Results

A total of 130 cases of preeclampsia were recorded. Compared to the control group, we observed a significantly higher Apgar score in the study group with emergency Cesarean section. Furthermore, within the study group the Apgar score at 5 and 10 min was also significantly increased in cases delivered by emergency Cesarean section. Moreover, the pH value of the umbilical cord was significantly higher in the study group. Considering the delivery mode, significant differences were found in favor of the elective Cesarean section. There were no differences in the rate of NICU admission between the groups.

Conclusion

The most frequent mode of delivery for women suffering from preeclampsia is elective Cesarean section; however, neonates delivered by emergency Cesarean section did not show an adverse neonatal outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NICU:

Neonatal Intermediate Care Unit

IOL:

Induction of labor

G:

Gram

References

  1. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on high blood pressure in pregnancy (2000) Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(1): S1–S22

    Google Scholar 

  2. ACOG practice bulletin (2002) Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol 99(1):159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong Y, Jia J, Lü D, Dai L, Bai Y, Zhou R (2012) Outcome and risk factors of early onset severe preeclampsia. Chin Med J 125(14):2623–2627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown MA, Hague WM, Higgins J et al (2000) The detection, investigation and management of hypertension in pregnancy: full consensus statement. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 40(2):139–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Glickman H, Kaplan B, Hod M, Bar J (2005) Mode of delivery in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix following induction of labor with vaginal application of prostaglandin E. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84(7):665–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coppage KH, Polzin WJ (2002) Severe preeclampsia and delivery outcomes: is immediate cesarean delivery beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(5):921–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim LH, Cheng YW, Delaney S, Jelin AC, Caughey AB (2010) Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of Cesarean delivery if labor is induced? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23(5):383–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Field N, Conway D, Langer O (1997) Preeclampsia: is induction of labor more successful? Obstet Gynecol 89(4):600–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fatemeh T, Marziyeh G, Nayereh G, Anahita G, Samira T (2010) Maternal and perinatal outcome in nulliparious women complicated with pregnancy hypertension. J Pak Med Assoc 60(9):707–710

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saadat M, Nejad SM, Habibi G, Sheikhvatan M (2007) Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 46(3):255–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Masoura S, Kalogiannidis I, Margioula-Siarkou C et al (2012) Neonatal outcomes of late preterm deliveries with pre-eclampsia. Minerva Ginecol 64(2):109–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallis AB, Saftlas AF, Hsia J, Atrash HK (2008) Secular trends in the rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational hypertension, United States, 1987–2004. Am J Hypertens 21(5):521–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H et al (2009) Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9694):979–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tajik P, van der Tuuk K, Koopmans CM et al (2012) Should cervical favorability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial. BJOG 119(9):1123–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alanis MC, Robinson CJ, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Johnson DD (2008) Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(3): 262.e1–262.e6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards C, Witter FR (1997) Preeclampsia, labor duration and mode of delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 57(1):39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langenveld J, Ravelli ACJ, van Kaam AH et al (2011) Neonatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation: a 7 year retrospective analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(6): 540.e1–540.e17

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yücesoy G, Ozkan S, Bodur H et al (2005) Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: a seven year experience of a tertiary care center. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273(1):43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andreani M, Locatelli A, Assi F et al (2007) Predictors of umbilical artery acidosis in preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(3): 303.e1–303.e5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Locatelli A, Incerti M, Ghidini A, Greco M, Villa E, Paterlini G (2008) Factors associated with umbilical artery acidemia in term infants with low Apgar scores at 5 min. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139(2):146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Habli M, Levine RJ, Qian C, Sibai B (2007) Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension and in normotensive pregnancies that delivered at 35, 36, or 37 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(4): 406.e1–406.e7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ayaz A, Muhammad T, Hussain SA, Habib S (2009) Neonatal outcome in pre-eclamptic patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 21(2):53–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors notify no conflicts of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Lehner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pacher, J., Brix, E. & Lehner, R. The mode of delivery in patients with preeclampsia at term subject to elective or emergency Cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289, 263–267 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2936-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2936-3

Keywords

Navigation