Abstract.
The objective was to assess the value of uterine artery notching as a screening test for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction in a low-risk population of healthy pregnant women. Color Doppler ultrasound was used to examine both uterine arteries in 322 healthy pregnant women at 24.9±1.9 (range 22–28) weeks of gestation. The criterion for abnormal results was a unilateral or bilateral presence of an early diastolic notch. The major end points were preeclampsia and small for gestational age (SGA) infants. Of the 322 women, 19 (5.9%) developed preeclampsia and six of them (1.9%) delivered SGA infants. An early diastolic notch was detected in 58 women (18%). The risk of developing preeclampsia and SGA infants in an abnormal Doppler study group was found to be greater than in that of a normal group (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting preeclampsia were 36.8, 83.2, 12.1, and 95.5%, respectively; whereas detecting SGA infants were 67, 82.9, 6.9, and 99.2%, respectively. Women with an early diastolic notch have considerably a higher risk of developing preeclampsia and SGA infants. On the other hand, women with normal uterine artery waveforms are unlikely to develop preeclampsia and SGA infants. The test may be useful to minimize unnecessary interventions.
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2001) Intrauterine growth restriction. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 72:85–96
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2002) Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. ACOG practical bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol 99:159–166
Arduini D, Rizzo G, Boccolini MR, Romanini C, Mancuso S (1990) Functional assessment of uteroplacental and fetal circulations by means of color Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 9:249–253
Bewley S, Cooper D, Campbell S (1991) Doppler investigation of uteroplacental blood flow resistance in the second trimester: a screening study for pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:871–879
Bower S, Bewley S, Campbell S (1993) Improved prediction of preeclampsia by two-stage screening of uterine arteries using the early diastolic notch and color Doppler imaging. Obstet Gynecol 82:78–83
Bower S, Schuchter K, Campbell S (1993) Doppler ultrasound screening as part of routine antenatal scanning: prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:989–994
Campbell S, Diaz-Recasens J, Griffin DR, Cohen-Overbeek TE, Pearce JM, Willson K, Teague MJ (1983) New Doppler technique for assessing uteroplacental blood flow. Lancet 1:675–677
Campbell S, Pearce JM, Hackett G, Cohen-Overbeek T, Hernandez C (1986) Qualitative assessment of uteroplacental blood flow: early screening test for high-risk pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 68:649–653
Chan FY, Pun TC, Lam C, Khoo J, Lee CP, Lam YH (1995) Pregnancy screening by uterine artery Doppler velocimetry–which criterion performs best? Obstet Gynecol 85:596–602
Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C, Hecher K, Campbell S (1996) Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:182–188
Irion O, Masse J, Forest JC, Moutquin JM (1996) Peak systolic over protodiastolic ratio as an objective substitute for the uterine artery notch. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:993–998
Irion O, Masse J, Forest JC, Moutquin JM (1998) Prediction of pre-eclampsia, low birthweight for gestation and prematurity by uterine artery blood flow velocity waveforms analysis in low risk nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:422–429
Khong TY, De Wolf F, Robertson WB, Brosens I (1986) Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:1049–1059
Kurdi W, Campbell S, Aquilina J, England P, Harrington K (1998) The role of color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at 20 weeks' gestation in stratifying antenatal care. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:339–345
Lin S, Shimizu I, Suehara N, Nakayama M, Aono T (1995) Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in relation to trophoblast migration into the myometrium of the placental bed. Obstet Gynecol 85:760–765
Mires GJ, Williams FL, Leslie J, Howie PW (1998) Assessment of uterine arterial notching as a screening test for adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1317–1323
North RA, Ferrier C, Long D, Townend K, Kincaid-Smith P (1994) Uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms in the second trimester for the prediction of preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 83:378–386
Oosterhof H, Aarnoudse JG (1992) Ultrasound pulsed Doppler studies of the uteroplacental circulation: the influence of sampling site and placenta implantation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 33:75–79
Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Bindra R, Pandis G, Nicolaides KH (2001) Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:441–449
Schulman H, Winter D, Farmakides G, Ducey J, Guzman E, Coury A, Penny B (1989) Pregnancy surveillance with Doppler velocimetry of uterine and umbilical arteries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:192–196
Steel SA, Pearce JM, McParland P, Chamberlain GV (1990) Early Doppler ultrasound screening in prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Lancet 335:1548–1551
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phupong, V., Dejthevaporn, T., Tanawattanacharoen, S. et al. Predicting the risk of preeclampsia and small for gestational age infants by uterine artery Doppler in low-risk women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268, 158–161 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-002-0361-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-002-0361-0