Abstract
Purpose
Various researchers have observed small areas of osteolysis after using bioabsorbable anchors in shoulder surgeries. The purpose of this study is to determine whether radiographic perianchor radiolucent rings after rotator cuff repair are associated with the failure of repair and also assess their clinical implications. Further, the most frequent location of the radiolucent rings in the double-row suture bridge configuration was also assessed.
Methods
One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by suture bridge technique were retrospectively evaluated radiographically and clinically. The number and size of the rings that appeared at each follow-up were recorded. Also, the locations of each ring were recorded as anterior, middle or posterior, and medial or lateral according to the construct of the anchors used for suture bridge technique. The size of the tear, the number of anchors used and age of the patients were compared. Re-tear rates according to ultrasound examinations were also analyzed.
Results
After rotator cuff repair, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score increased from 46.7 to 88.0 and the overall re-tear rate was 8.5% (11 cases). Seventy-three patients (56.6%) showed RR (total number of 99 rings) at least once during the course of their follow-up and the rings appeared at a mean period of 18.2 months after surgery. Mean size of the rings initially was 5.6 mm and the rings increased or decreased in mean size of 0.4 mm during mean follow-up of 37 months. No correlation was seen with the number of RRs and the rate of re-tears, number of anchors, size of tears, and clinical outcome as determined by the ASES score. Radiolucent ring measurement reproducibility was confirmed by independent, repeated measurements. The rings appeared mostly at anteromedial anchors (75 rings, 75.8%) and the authors suggest that mechanical factors may play a role for the cause of radiolucent rings.
Conclusions
The number and the size of RRs around bioabsorbable anchors after rotator cuff repair do not appear to adversely affect the healing and clinical outcome of ARCR. Most radiolucent rings appeared at anteromedial anchors, indicating that mechanical factors may play a role for the radiolucencies.
Level of evidence
Case series, level IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Athwal GS, Shridharani SM, O’Driscoll SW (2006) Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(8):1840–1845
Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL (2006) Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(3):290–299
Bostman OM, Pihlajamaki HK (2000) Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:216–227
Burkart A, Imhoff AB, Roscher E (2000) Foreign-body reaction to the bioabsorbable suretac device. Arthroscopy 16(1):91–95
Burkhart SS (2005) Letter to the editor. Am J Sports Med 33:11
Burkhart SS, Denard PJ, Konicek J, Hanypsiak BT (2014) Biomechanical validation of load-sharing rip-stop fixation for the repair of tissue-deficient rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 42(2):457–462
Costello MF, Shrestha SM, Sjoblom P et al (2006) Power doppler ultrasound assessment of the relationship between age and ovarian perifollicular blood flow in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 23(9–10):359–365
Dhawan A, Ghodadra N, Karas V, Salata MJ, Cole BJ (2011) Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 40(6):1424–1430
Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Funck E, Kohler K, Sernert N, Karlsson J (2000) A clinical and radiographic comparison of absorbable and non-absorbable suture anchors in open shoulder stabilisation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(6):349–355
Freehill MQ, Harms DJ, Huber SM, Atlihan D, Buss DD (2003) Poly-l-lactic acid tack synovitis after arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 31(5):643–647
Fuchs B, Gilbart MK, Hodler J, Gerber C (2006) Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one-tendon tear of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(2):309–316
Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(2):219–224
Glueck D, Wilson TC, Johnson DL (2005) Extensive osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor: a case report. Am J Sports Med 33(5):742–744
Goradia VK, Mullen DJ, Boucher HR, Parks BG, O’Donnell JB (2001) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures. Arthroscopy 17(4):360–364
Gunja NJ, Athanasiou KA (2006) Biodegradable materials in arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc 14(3):112–119
Howe C, Huber P, Wolf FM, Matsen F 3rd (2009) Differential suture loading in an experimental rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 37(2):324–329
Jost B, Zumstein M, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C (2006) Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(3):472–479
Kaplan K, Elattrache NS, Vazquez O, Chen YJ, Lee T (2011) Knotless rotator cuff repair in an external rotation model: the importance of medial-row horizontal mattress sutures. Arthroscopy 27(4):471–478
Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Funck E, Kohler K, Sernert N, Karlsson J (1998) Arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization using absorbable implants. A clinical and radiographic comparison of two methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(3):181–188
McFarland EG, Park HB, Keyurapan E, Gill HS, Selhi HS (2005) Suture anchors and tacks for shoulder surgery, part 1: biology and biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 33(12):1918–1923
McNally EG (2011) The development and clinical applications of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Skelet Radiol 40(9):1223–1231
Muller M, Kaab MJ, Villiger C, Holzach P (2002) Osteolysis after open shoulder stabilization using a new bio-resorbable bone anchor: a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Injury 33(Suppl 2):B30–B36
Nho SJ, Provencher MT, Seroyer ST, Romeo AA (2009) Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy 25(7):788–793
Nusselt T, Freche S, Klinger HM, Baums MH (2010) Intraosseous foreign body granuloma in rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable suture anchor. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(8):1037–1040
Pilge H, Spang J, Rose T, Wolter H, Woertler K, Imhoff AB (2011) Osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable anchors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(3):305–310
Spoliti M (2007) Glenoid osteolysis after arthroscopic labrum repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor. Acta Orthop Belg 73(1):107–110
Tanaka M, Hayashida K, Kobayashi A, Kakiuchi M (2015) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with absorbable sutures in the medial-row anchors. Arthroscopy 31(11):2099–2105
Thorsness R, Romeo A (2016) Massive rotator cuff tears: trends in surgical management. Orthopedics 39(3):145–151
Warme WJ, Arciero RA, Savoie FH 3rd, Uhorchak JM, Walton M (1999) Nonabsorbable versus absorbable suture anchors for open Bankart repair. A prospective, randomized comparison. Am J Sports Med 27(6):742–746
Yen CH, Chiou HJ, Chou YH et al (2004) Six surgery-correlated sonographic signs for rotator cuff tears: emphasis on partial-thickness tear. Clin Imaging 28(1):69–76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
Authors Jin-Young Park, Suk-Hwan Jang, Kyung-Soo Oh, and Yi Jin Li declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, JY., Jang, SH., Oh, KS. et al. Radiolucent rings around bioabsorbable anchors after rotator cuff repair are not associated with clinical outcomes . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 1539–1546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2772-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2772-1