Skip to main content
Log in

The modified Cassie’s equation and contact angle hysteresis

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we derive a modified Cassie’s equation for wetting on chemically patterned surfaces from a homogenization approach. The derivation reveals that effective contact angle is a local average of the static contact angle along the contact line which describes all possible equilibrium states including the local minimum of the free energy of the system. The usual Cassie’s state which corresponds to the global minimum is only a special case. We then discuss the contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Alberti G, DeSimone A (2005) Wetting of rough surfaces: a homogenization approach. Proc R Soc A 451:79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J, Meunier J, Rolley E (2009) Wetting and spreading. Rev Mod Phys 81:739–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bormashenko E (2009) A variational approach to wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon? Langmuir 25(18):10451–10454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassie A, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh M, Öner D, Youngblood J, McCarthy TJ (1999) Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395–3399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimitrov DI, Milchev A, Binder K (2010) Method for wettability characterization based on contact line pinning. Phys Rev E 81:04163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762–3765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) Reply to “Comment on How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy”. Langmuir 23:13243–13243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Gennes PG (1985) Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 57:827863

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quere D 2003 Capillarity and wetting phenomena. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson RE Jr, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis. III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surfaces. J Phys Chem 68:1744–1750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marmur A, Bittoun E (2009) When Wenzel and Cassie are right: reconciling local and global considerations. Langmuir 25:1277–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mchale G (2007) Cassie and Wenzel: were they really so wrong. Langmuir 23:8200–8205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mognetti BM, Yeomans JM (2009) Modeling receding contact lines on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26:18162–18168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Panchagnula MV, Vedantam S (2007) Comment on how Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy. Langmuir 23:13242–13242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz LW, Garoff S (1985) Contact angle hysteresis on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 1:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turco A, Alouges F, DeSimone A (2009) Wetting on rough surfaces and contact angle hysteresis: numerical experiments based on a phase field model. M2AN 43:1027–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whyman G, Bormashenko E, Stein T (2008) The rigorous derivative of Young, Cassie–Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon. Chem Phys Lett 450:355–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolansky G, Marmur A (1999) Apparent contact angles on rough surfaces: the Wenzel equation revisited. Colloids Surf A 156:381–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu X, Wang X-P (2010) Derivation of Wenzel’s and Cassie’s equations froma phase fieeld model for two phase flow on rough surface. SIAM J Appl Math 70:2929–2941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu X, Wang X-P (2011) Analysis of wetting and contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned surfaces. SIAM J Appl Math 71:1753–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:6587

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianmin Xu.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Contact Angle Hysteresis

This publication was based on work supported in part by Award No SA-C0040/UK-C0016, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Hong Kong RGC-CERG grants 603107 and 604209, Chinese NSFC project 11001260, and by National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, CAS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, X., Wang, X. The modified Cassie’s equation and contact angle hysteresis. Colloid Polym Sci 291, 299–306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2748-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2748-1

Keywords

Navigation