Abstract
In this paper, we derive a modified Cassie’s equation for wetting on chemically patterned surfaces from a homogenization approach. The derivation reveals that effective contact angle is a local average of the static contact angle along the contact line which describes all possible equilibrium states including the local minimum of the free energy of the system. The usual Cassie’s state which corresponds to the global minimum is only a special case. We then discuss the contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned surfaces.
References
Alberti G, DeSimone A (2005) Wetting of rough surfaces: a homogenization approach. Proc R Soc A 451:79–97
Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J, Meunier J, Rolley E (2009) Wetting and spreading. Rev Mod Phys 81:739–805
Bormashenko E (2009) A variational approach to wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon? Langmuir 25(18):10451–10454
Cassie A, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551
Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh M, Öner D, Youngblood J, McCarthy TJ (1999) Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395–3399
Dimitrov DI, Milchev A, Binder K (2010) Method for wettability characterization based on contact line pinning. Phys Rev E 81:04163
Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762–3765
Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) Reply to “Comment on How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy”. Langmuir 23:13243–13243
de Gennes PG (1985) Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 57:827863
de Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quere D 2003 Capillarity and wetting phenomena. Springer, Berlin
Johnson RE Jr, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis. III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surfaces. J Phys Chem 68:1744–1750
Marmur A, Bittoun E (2009) When Wenzel and Cassie are right: reconciling local and global considerations. Langmuir 25:1277–1281
Mchale G (2007) Cassie and Wenzel: were they really so wrong. Langmuir 23:8200–8205
Mognetti BM, Yeomans JM (2009) Modeling receding contact lines on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26:18162–18168
Panchagnula MV, Vedantam S (2007) Comment on how Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy. Langmuir 23:13242–13242
Schwartz LW, Garoff S (1985) Contact angle hysteresis on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 1:219–230
Turco A, Alouges F, DeSimone A (2009) Wetting on rough surfaces and contact angle hysteresis: numerical experiments based on a phase field model. M2AN 43:1027–1044
Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988994
Whyman G, Bormashenko E, Stein T (2008) The rigorous derivative of Young, Cassie–Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon. Chem Phys Lett 450:355–359
Wolansky G, Marmur A (1999) Apparent contact angles on rough surfaces: the Wenzel equation revisited. Colloids Surf A 156:381–388
Xu X, Wang X-P (2010) Derivation of Wenzel’s and Cassie’s equations froma phase fieeld model for two phase flow on rough surface. SIAM J Appl Math 70:2929–2941
Xu X, Wang X-P (2011) Analysis of wetting and contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned surfaces. SIAM J Appl Math 71:1753–1779
Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:6587
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Contact Angle Hysteresis
This publication was based on work supported in part by Award No SA-C0040/UK-C0016, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Hong Kong RGC-CERG grants 603107 and 604209, Chinese NSFC project 11001260, and by National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, CAS.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, X., Wang, X. The modified Cassie’s equation and contact angle hysteresis. Colloid Polym Sci 291, 299–306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2748-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2748-1